Fluent Essays

Video Reflection Assignment Due Date: October 21st Objective: For this assignment, you are being asked to reflect on a video of a 4th grade reading lesson on using artifacts/primary sources to infer character traits of a person from history. Please follow this link to access the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERIwByt4xc0&feature=youtu.be After watching the video, please respond to the following question prompts. Your response to each question should be no more than 2 LENGTHY paragraphs and the total length of your paper should be no more than 5 pages. In your response, please cite evidence from the video and indicate the timestamp when making a specific reference to a section of the video. Reflection Questions 1. Notice: From timestamp 0:05 to 17:36, the teacher presents a mini-lesson on using artifacts and primary source documents to infer character traits. What do you notice about how she asks questions as a way to promote deeper learning? What do you notice about how the students respond to these questions? From timestamp 17:40 and 40:09, the students are working collaboratively on the activity. In what way did the classroom layout help or hinder the students’ ability to work collaboratively? 2. Theory to Practice Connection Based on your responses to question #1, please identify a theory, framework, or benchmark that we discussed in our class and describe how the teacher’s instructional practice aligns with the theory. In your answer, please cite specific elements of the theory, framework, or benchmark that are demonstrated by the teacher. I HAVE ATTACHED THE THEORIES ETC WE SPOKE ABOUT IN CLASS 3. Lesson Evaluation As you think about the lesson overall, what did you appreciate and think worked well? For example, how would you characterize the level of student engagement? How effective was the use of technology during the lesson? How effective were students at working collaboratively? How effective was the teacher at achieving the goals of the lesson? In your response, please cite specific evidence to support your claims. 4. Lesson Plan This was a reading lesson on using artifacts/primary sources to infer character traits of a person from history. Drawing upon course materials please write two paragraphs describing how would you create a follow up lesson for this class? In your response, please be sure to address the following questions: What connections do you intend to develop within the lesson that links the lesson to student’s lives? What strategies will you use to ensure that all students are engaged in the lesson? Running head: BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 5 Business Management: Management/Strategic Planning Name Course Tutor Date Business Management: Management/Strategic Planning Motivation is a critical part of business management, which entails giving the employees reasons for acting in a particular way. The manager of a business needs to engage in motivational activities to improve the employees' willingness to work towards achieving the objectives and the goals that the business organization has set effectively(Abyad, 2018). It’s about doing what one can to encourage the employees to do the very best in their work. When the employees are motivated, they work better as they care about the business's success, and thus they work better. This causes an increase in output and, therefore, an increase in the organization's productivity and success in the goals it has set. This paper seeks to review several motivation theories or ideas in the context of the business environment. Whether any of the theories are useful in motivating me There are various theories of motivation, including McClelland's theory, which is about the need for affiliation, power, and achievement, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which stipulates that a person will only be motivated if their needs get met; Hertzberg's two-factor theory which is about ensuring that the hygiene factors and the motivating factors have to be met for the employee to be satisfied and factors of motivation to be met for the employees to be both satisfied with their work and motivated to give the best (Abyad, 2018). Vroom’s expectancy theory states that people will be motivated highly are two conditions are met, including people believing that their efforts will lead to success and people believing that they will get rewarded for success. McGregor’s theory X and theory Y is another motivation theory that provides that the workplace comprises people of different natures. Each of them needs to get managed accordingly. Theory X provides that people at the workplace are inherently lazy, and thus, a strong and top down control style is the most appropriate. Theory Y provides that workers are inherently eager and motivated to work. Thus a manager should focus on creating a work environment that is productive with positive reinforcements and rewards. The theory that will be most effective in motivating me is Maslow’s theory about the hierarchy of needs, which provides that the employees will get highly motivated if the organization is meeting their needs. This is because in meeting my needs as an employee, the company will be able to ensure that the environment in which I work is comfortable for me to provide efficient services. When I have nothing to complain about in my personal and work environment, I will be able to give the best I can to keep my job by giving the best to the company I work for. When I feel accepted and have control of my work in the business, I will be motivated to produce the best. Example of effective use of the theory by a manager to motivate me There is an instance where the manager of my company used Maslow's needs theory to motivate me (Jonas, 2016). This happened in the organization when we were working on a project to enhance the quality of our products. The manager put me in charge of the project and trusting me to deliver quality; he allowed me to make all the major decisions concerning the project, including choosing my own team. All the resources that I needed to make the project a success was availed to me, allowing me to meet the desired outcome. Having given control over my own work with no interference of the manager and feeling accepted in terms of my skills to produce the best, I felt motivated to do well so that I do not disappoint the manger that had trusted the company and me as a whole as it was looking up to me to make the best decisions for the company’s success. The manager ensured that the work environment I was in was comfortable enough with every need addressed. The situation where an attempted motivational tool did not work While the motivational tools often work on employees in the business, there is a situation where it failed to work on the employees in the business organization I work for. The manager of the organization, in attempting to motivate the employees to give the best. The manager applied McGregor’s theory X based on the fact that he treated the employees in accordance with their nature. In this case, the manager addressed the employees who appeared to be lazy harshly and aggressively, thinking that they will be pushed to work hard. Instead, the employees became fearful of the manager because they could not communicate with the manager in instances where they needed assistance to complete a particular task. This led to poor outcomes arising from the poor relationship and communication between the manager and the employees. In applying theory Y, The manager only created division among the employees as the manager appeared to focus more on meeting the needs of the employees that are highly motivated instead of finding ways to motivate the low performers to perform better. The manager seemed to be favoring the already motivated employees. With this, the performance of the company became even worse. Explanation of the second example The Aspect about the second example that made it not work is the fact that instead of the manager using ways that are positive to motivate the lazy employees so that they can rise to the same level as the motivated employees, the manger caused the lazy employees to have fear and do their work out of fear, with no courage to ask for help in areas where they needed it. The employees ended up being demotivated, causing poor productivity (Neisig, 2019). The approach that the manager used in motivating the employees and communicating what he wanted them to do created fear instead of motivation to be better, leading to poor outcomes in the organization’s performance. References Abyad, A. (2018). Project management, motivation theories, and process management. Middle East Journal of Business, 13(4), 18-22. Jonas, J. (2016). Making practical use of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory to motivate employees: a case of Masvingo Polytechnic. Journal of Management & Administration, 2016(2), 105-117. Neisig, M. (2019). When motivation theories create demotivation and impair productivity. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5(3), 149-152. 1 Learning: Theory and Research © 2016 Regents of the University of California Learning theory and research have long been the province of education and psychology, but what is now known about how people learn comes from research in many different disciplines. This chapter introduces three central learning theories: Behaviorism, Cognitive Constructionism, and Social Constructionism Overview of Learning Theories Although there are many different approaches to learning, there are three basic types of learning theory: behaviorist, cognitive constructivist, and social constructivist. This section provides a brief introduction to each type of learning theory. The theories are treated in four parts: a short historical introduction, a discussion of the view of knowledge presupposed by the theory, an account of how the theory treats learning and student motivation, and finally, an overview of some of the instructional methods promoted by the theory is presented. Behaviorism Cognitive Constructivism Social Constructivism View of knowledge Knowledge is a repertoire of behavioral responses to environmental stimuli. Knowledge systems of cognitive structures are actively constructed by learners based on pre-existing cognitive structures. Knowledge is constructed within social contexts through interactions with a knowledge community. View of learning Passive absorption of a predefined body of knowledge by the learner. Promoted by repetition and positive reinforcement. Active assimilation and accommodation of new information to existing cognitive structures. Discovery by learners. Integration of students into a knowledge community. Collaborative assimilation and accommodation of new information. View of motivation Extrinsic, involving positive and negative reinforcement. Intrinsic; learners set their own goals and motivate themselves to learn. Intrinsic and extrinsic. Learning goals and motives are determined both by learners and extrinsic rewards provided by the knowledge community. Implications for Teaching Correct behavioral responses are transmitted by the teacher and absorbed by the students. The teacher facilitates learning by providing an environment that promotes discovery and assimilation/accommodation. Collaborative learning is facilitated and guided by the teacher. Group work. Behaviorism Behaviorist teaching methods have proven most successful in areas where there is a "correct" response or easily memorized material. http://gsi.staging.wpengine.com/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/behaviorism/ http://gsi.staging.wpengine.com/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/cognitive-constructivism/ http://gsi.staging.wpengine.com/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/social-constructivism/ 2 Background Methodological behaviorism began as a reaction against the introspective psychology that dominated the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Introspective psychologists such as Wilhelm Wundt maintained that the study of consciousness was the primary object of psychology. Their methodology was primarily introspective, relying heavily on first-person reports of sensations and the constituents of immediate experiences. Behaviorists such as J. B. Watson and B. F. Skinner rejected introspectionist methods as being subjective and unquantifiable. Instead, they focused on objectively observable, quantifiable events and behavior. They argued that since it is not possible to observe objectively or to quantify what occurs in the mind, scientific theories should take into account only observable indicators such as stimulus-response sequences. According to Skinner (1976, 23), The mentalistic problem can be avoided by going directly to the prior physical causes while bypassing intermediate feelings or states of mind. The quickest way to do this is to ... consider only those facts which can be objectively observed in the behavior of one person in its relation to his [or her] prior environmental history. Radical behaviorists such as Skinner also made the ontological claim that facts about mental states are reducible to facts about behavioral dispositions. View of Knowledge Behaviorists such as Watson and Skinner construe knowledge as a repertoire of behaviors. Skinner argues that it is not the case that we use knowledge to guide our action; rather "knowledge is action, or at least rules for action" (152). It is a set of passive, largely mechanical responses to environmental stimuli. So, for instance, the behaviorist would argue that to say that that someone knows Shakespeare is to say that they have a certain behavioral repertoire with respect to Shakespeare (152). Knowledge that is not actively expressed in behavior can be explained as behavioral capacities. For example, "I know a bluebird when I see one" can be seen as effectively equivalent to "I have the capacity to identify a bluebird although I am not now doing so" (154). If knowledge is construed as a repertoire of behaviors, someone can be said to understand something if they possess the appropriate repertoire. No mention of cognitive processes is necessary (156-57). View of Learning From a behaviorist perspective, the transmission of information from teacher to learner is essentially the transmission of the response appropriate to a certain stimulus. Thus, the point of education is to present the student with the appropriate repertoire of behavioral responses to specific stimuli and to reinforce those responses through an effective reinforcement schedule (161). An effective reinforcement schedule requires consistent repetition of the material; small, progressive sequences of tasks; and continuous positive reinforcement. Without positive reinforcement, learned responses will quickly become extinct. This is because learners will continue to modify their behavior until they receive some positive reinforcement. View of Motivation 3 Behaviorists explain motivation in terms of schedules of positive and negative reinforcement. Just as receiving food pellets each time it pecks at a button teaches a pigeon to peck the button, pleasant experiences cause human learners to make the desired connections between specific stimuli and the appropriate responses. For example, a student who receives verbal praise and good grades for correct answers (positive reinforcement) is likely to learn those answers effectively; one who receives little or no positive feedback for the same answers (negative reinforcement) is less likely to learn them as effectively. Likewise, human learners tend to avoid responses that are associated with punishment or unpleasant consequences such as poor grades or adverse feedback. Implications for Teaching Behaviorist teaching methods tend to rely on so-called "skill and drill" exercises to provide the consistent repetition necessary for effective reinforcement of response patterns. Other methods include question (stimulus) and answer (response) frameworks in which questions are of gradually increasing difficulty; guided practice; and regular reviews of material. Behaviorist methods also typically rely heavily on the use of positive reinforcements such as verbal praise, good grades, and prizes. Behaviorists assess the degree of learning using methods that measure observable behavior such as exam performance. Behaviorist teaching methods have proven most successful in areas where there is a "correct" response or easily memorized material. For example, while behaviorist methods have proven to be successful in teaching structured material such as facts and formulae, scientific concepts, and foreign language vocabulary, their efficacy in teaching comprehension, composition, and analytical abilities is questionable. Reference Skinner, B. F. (1976). About Behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books. Cognitive Constructivism Cognitivist teaching methods aim to assist students in assimilating new information to existing knowledge, and enabling them to make the appropriate modifications to their existing intellectual framework to accommodate that information. Background Dissatisfaction with behaviorism's strict focus on observable behavior led educational psychologists such as Jean Piaget and William Perry to demand an approach to learning theory that paid more attention to what went on "inside the learner's head." They developed a cognitive approach that focused on mental processes rather than observable behavior. Common to most cognitivist approaches is the idea that knowledge comprises symbolic mental representations, such as propositions and images, together with a mechanism that operates on those representations. Knowledge is seen as something that is actively constructed by learners based on their existing cognitive structures. Therefore, learning is relative to their stage of cognitive development; understanding the learner's existing intellectual framework is central to understanding the learning process. 4 View of Knowledge While behaviorists maintain that knowledge is a passively absorbed behavioral repertoire, cognitive constructivists argue instead that knowledge is actively constructed by learners and that any account of knowledge makes essential references to cognitive structures. Knowledge comprises active systems of intentional mental representations derived from past learning experiences. Each learner interprets experiences and information in the light of their extant knowledge, their stage of cognitive development, their cultural background, their personal history, and so forth. Learners use these factors to organize their experience and to select and transform new information. Knowledge is therefore actively constructed by the learner rather than passively absorbed; it is essentially dependent on the standpoint from which the learner approaches it. View of Learning Because knowledge is actively constructed, learning is presented as a process of active discovery. The role of the instructor is not to drill knowledge into students through consistent repetition, or to goad them into learning through carefully employed rewards and punishments. Rather, the role of the teacher is to facilitate discovery by providing the necessary resources and by guiding learners as they attempt to assimilate new knowledge to old and to modify the old to accommodate the new. Teachers must thus take into account the knowledge that the learner currently possesses when deciding how to construct the curriculum and to present, sequence, and structure new material. View of Motivation Unlike behaviorist learning theory, where learners are thought to be motivated by extrinsic factors such as rewards and punishment, cognitive learning theory sees motivation as largely intrinsic. Because it involves significant restructuring of existing cognitive structures, successful learning requires a major personal investment on the part of the learner (Perry 1999, 54). Learners must face up to the limitations of their existing knowledge and accept the need to modify or abandon existing beliefs. Without some kind of internal drive on the part of the learner to do so, external rewards and punishments such as grades are unlikely to be sufficient. Implications for Teaching Cognitivist teaching methods aim to assist students in assimilating new information to existing knowledge, and enabling them to make the appropriate modifications to their existing intellectual framework to accommodate that information. Thus, while cognitivists allow for the use of "skill and drill" exercises in the memorization of facts, formulae, and lists, they place greater importance on strategies that help students to actively assimilate and accommodate new material. For instance, asking students to explain new material in their own words can assist them in assimilating it by forcing them to re-express the new ideas in their existing vocabulary. Likewise, providing students with sets of questions to structure their reading makes it easier for them to relate it to previous material by highlighting certain parts and to accommodate the new material by providing a clear organizational structure. Because learning is largely self-motivated in the cognitivist framework, cognitivists such as A. L. Brown and J. D. Ferrara have also suggested methods which require students to monitor their own learning. For instance, the use of ungraded tests and study questions enables students to monitor 5 their own understanding of the material. Other methods that have been suggested include the use of learning journals by students to monitor progress and highlight any recurring difficulties, and to analyze study habits. Jean Piaget The most influential exponent of cognitivism was Swiss child psychologist Jean Piaget. Piaget rejected the idea that learning was the passive assimilation of given knowledge. Instead, he proposed that learning is a dynamic process comprising successive stages of adaption to reality during which learners actively construct knowledge by creating and testing their own theories of the world (1968, 8). Piaget’s theory has two main strands: first, an account of the mechanisms by which cognitive development takes place; and second, an account of the four main stages of cognitive development through which children pass. The basic principle underlying Piaget's theory is the principle of equilibration: all cognitive development (including both intellectual and affective development) progresses towards increasingly complex and stable levels of organization. Equilibration takes place through a process of adaption, that is, assimilation of new information to existing cognitive structures and the accommodation of that information through the formation of new cognitive structures. For example, learners who already have the cognitive structures necessary to solve percentage problems in mathematics will have some of the structures necessary to solve time-rate-distance problems, but they will need to modify their existing structures to accommodate the newly acquired information to solve the new type of problem. Thus, learners adapt and develop by assimilating and accommodating new information into existing cognitive structures. Piaget suggested that there are four main stages in the cognitive development of children. In the first two years, children pass through a sensorimotor stage during which they progress from cognitive structures dominated by instinctual drives and undifferentiated emotions to more organized systems of concrete concepts, differentiated emotions, and their first external affective fixations. At this stage, children's outlook is essentially egocentric in the sense that they are unable to take into account others' points of view. The second stage of development lasts until around seven years of age. Children begin to use language to make sense of reality. They learn to classify objects using different criteria and to manipulate numbers. Children's increasing linguistic skills open the way for greater socialization of action and communication with others. From the ages of seven to twelve years, children begin to develop logic, although they can only perform logical operations on concrete objects and events. In adolescence, children enter the formal operational stage, which continues throughout the rest of their lives. Children develop the ability to perform abstract intellectual operations, and reach affective and intellectual maturity. They learn how to formulate and test abstract hypotheses without referring to concrete objects. Most importantly, children develop the capacity to appreciate others' points of view as well as their own. Piaget's theory was widely accepted from the 1950s until the 1970s. Although the theory is not now as widely accepted, it has had a significant influence on later theories of cognitive development. For instance, the idea of adaption through assimilation and accommodation is still widely accepted. William G. Perry William G. Perry, an educational researcher at Harvard University, developed an account of the cognitive and intellectual development of college-age students through a fifteen-year study of students at Harvard and Radcliffe in the 1950s and 1960s. Perry generalized that study to give a more detailed account of post-adolescent development than did Piaget. He also introduces the 6 concept of positionality and develops a less static view of developmental transitions. The sequence of cognitive structures that make up the developmental process may be described in terms of cross- sections of cognitive structures representative of different stages in the developmental sequence. Each stage is construed as a relatively stable, enduring cognitive structure, which includes and builds upon past structures. Stages are characterized by the coherence and consistency of the structures that compose them. The transition between stages is mediated by less stable, less consistent transitional structures. Freud, Whitehead, and Piaget all use the notion of a stage in this way. Perry rejects the notion of a stage. He argues that construing development in terms of a sequence of stable stages in which students are "imprisoned" is too static (Perry 1999, xii). Instead, he introduces the notion of a position. Perry accepted Piaget's claim that learners adapt and develop by assimilating and accommodating new information into existing cognitive structures. He also accepted Piaget's claim that the sequence of cognitive structures that constitute the developmental process are both logically and hierarchically related, insofar as each builds upon and thus presupposes the previous structure. However, he laid far greater emphasis on the idea that learners approach knowledge from a variety of different standpoints. Thus, according to Perry, gender, race, culture, and socioeconomic class influence our approach to learning just as much as our stage of cognitive development (xii). We each interpret the world from a different position (46) and each person may occupy several positions simultaneously with respect to different subjects and experiences (xii). The developmental process is a constantly changing series of transitions between various positions. Perry provides the following illustration o f different types of position (1999, 2): ... a lecturer announces that today he will consider three theories explanatory of . Student A has always taken it for granted that knowledge consists of correct answers, that there is one right answer per problem, and that teachers explain these answers for students to learn. He therefore listens for the lecturer to state which theory to learn. Student B makes the same general assumptions but with an elaboration to the effect that teachers sometimes present problems and procedures, rather than answers, "so that we can learn to find the right answer on our own..." Student C assumes that an answer can be called "right" only in the light of its context, and that contexts or "frames of reference" differ ... Whatever the lecturer then proceeds to do..., these three students will make meaning of the experience in different ways which will involve different assessments of their own choices and responsibilities. Perry identifies nine basic positions, of which the three major positions are duality, multiplicity, and commitment. The most basic position is duality. The world, knowledge and morality are assumed to have a dualistic structure. Things are right or wrong, true or false, good or bad. Students see teachers as authority figures who impart right answers and "the truth." The role of the student is seen as being to receive those answers and demonstrate that they have learned them. Detachment is difficult in this because there is only a single, correct point of view. Most students have passed beyond this stage by the time that they arrive in university. Those who have not quickly do so in the inherently pluralistic culture of modern universities. Positions two through four are largely transitional. Learners gradually develop an increased recognition of multiplicity but still assimilate that multiplicity to the fundamentally dualistic framework of the first position. For instance, a student may recognize the existence of a multiplicity of different points of view in the university but still look for the point of view that the teacher "wants us to learn" (121). The next major position is multiplicity. The world, knowledge and morality are accepted as relativistic 7 in the sense that truth is seen as relative to a frame of reference rather than absolute. Learners recognize that things can only be said to be right or wrong within a specific context. Teachers are seen as expert guides or consultants rather than as authority figures who impart "the truth." Peers are accepted as legitimate sources of learning (xxxii). This position involves a much more extensive restructuring of the learner's existing knowledge than previous positions as knowledge can no longer be assimilated to the existing dualistic organizational scheme. Positions six through eight are also largely transitional. Recognition of the relativity of knowledge leads to the realization that a stable locus or point of view is necessary for a sense of identity and to give some feeling of continuity. This leads to the gradual formation of commitments to certain points of view, relationships, sorts of activities, etc. The learner realizes the necessity to find his own point of view in a relativistic world. He or she begins by questioning and reconsidering past beliefs and commitments, then develops and expands upon firm commitments regarding important areas of life and knowledge. The final major position is commitment. The commitments that the learners have developed together with their recognition that all knowledge is relative, leads to the realization both that each person partly determines his or her own fate and the recognition that commitments, and hence identity, are constantly evolving. Because Perry's initial research was based on a small and fairly non-representative sample of students, many of the details of his positions have been modified or developed by later researchers. However, the idea of positionality has had a significant influence on social identity theory and his account of developmental transitions is consonant with current approaches to adult learning (xii). References Perry, William G. (1999). Forms of Ethical and Intellectual Development in the College Years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Piaget, Jean (1968). Six Psychological Studies. Anita Tenzer (Trans.), New York: Vintage Books. Social Constructivism The level of potential development is the level at which learning takes place. It comprises cognitive structures that are still in the process of maturing, but which can only mature under the guidance of or in collaboration with others. Background Social constructivism is a variety of cognitive constructivism that emphasizes the collaborative nature of much learning. Social constructivism was developed by post-revolutionary Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky. Vygotsky was a cognitivist, but rejected the assumption made by cognitivists such as Piaget and Perry that it was possible to separate learning from its social context. He argued that all cognitive functions originate in, and must therefore be explained as products of social interactions and that learning was not simply the assimilation and accommodation of new knowledge by learners; it was the process by which learners were integrated into a knowledge community. According to Vygotsky (1978, 57), Every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level and, later on, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then inside the child (intrapsychological). This applies 8 equally to voluntary attention, to logical memory, and to the formation of concepts. All the higher functions originate as actual relationships between individuals.Vygotsky's theory of social learning has been expanded upon by numerous later theorists and researchers. View of Knowledge Cognitivists such as Piaget and Perry see knowledge as actively constructed by learners in response to interactions with environmental stimuli. Vygotsky emphasized the role of language and culture in cognitive development. According to Vygotsky, language and culture play essential roles both in human intellectual development and in how humans perceive the world. Humans' linguistic abilities enable them to overcome the natural limitations of their perceptual field by imposing culturally defined sense and meaning on the world. Language and culture are the frameworks through which humans experience, communicate, and understand reality. Vygotsky states (1968, 39), A special feature of human perception ... is the perception of real objects ... I do not see the world simply in color and shape but also as a world with sense and meaning. I do not merely see something round and black with two hands; I see a clock ... Language and the conceptual schemes that are transmitted by means of language are essentially social phenomena. As a result, human cognitive structures are, Vygotsky believed, essentially socially constructed. Knowledge is not simply constructed, it is co-constructed. View of Learning Vygotsky accepted Piaget's claim that learners respond not to external stimuli but to their interpretation of those stimuli. However, he argued that cognitivists such as Piaget had overlooked the essentially social nature of language. As a result, he claimed they had failed to understand that learning is a collaborative process. Vygotsky distinguished between two developmental levels (85): The level of actual development is the level of development that the learner has already reached, and is the level at which the learner is capable of solving problems independently. The level of potential development (the "zone of proximal development") is the level of development that the learner is capable of reaching under the guidance of teachers or in collaboration with peers. The learner is capable of solving problems and understanding material at this level that they are not capable of solving or understanding at their level of actual development; the level of potential development is the level at which learning takes place. It comprises cognitive structures that are still in the process of maturing, but which can only mature under the guidance of or in collaboration with others. View of Motivation Behavioral motivation is essentially extrinsic -- a reaction to positive and negative reinforcements. Cognitive motivation is essentially intrinsic -- based on the learner's internal drive. Social constructivists see motivation as both extrinsic and intrinsic. Because learning is essentially a social phenomenon, learners are partially motivated by rewards provided by the knowledge community. However, because knowledge is actively constructed by the learner, learning also depends to a significant extent on the learner's internal drive to understand and promote the learning process. Implications for Teaching Collaborative learning methods require learners to develop teamwork skills and to see individual learning as essentially related to the success of group learning. The optimal size for group learning is four or five people. Since the average section size is ten to fifteen people, collaborative learning methods often require GSIs to break students into smaller groups, although discussion sections are essentially collaborative learning environments. For instance, in group investigations, students may be split into groups that are then required to choose and research a topic from a limited area. They 9 are then held responsible for researching the topic and presenting their findings to the class. More generally, collaborative learning should be seen as a process of peer interaction that is mediated and structured by the teacher. Discussion can be promoted by the presentation of specific concepts, problems, or scenarios; it is guided by means of effectively directed questions, the introduction and clarification of concepts and information, and references to previously learned material. Some more specific techniques are suggested in the Teaching Guide pages on Discussion Sections. Reference Vygotsky, Lev (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press. http://gsi.berkeley.edu/teachingguide/sections/index.html Learning: Theory and Research Behaviorism Behaviorist teaching methods have proven most successful in areas where there is a "correct" response or easily memorized material. View of Learning View of Motivation Implications for Teaching Reference Cognitivist teaching methods aim to assist students in assimilating new information to existing knowledge, and enabling them to make the appropriate modifications to their existing intellectual framework to accommodate that information. View of Knowledge View of Learning View of Motivation … Creating Developmentally and Culturally Responsive Lessons 1 Session Goals Review key aspects of Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories Discuss how beliefs and biases inform instructional practices Describe Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) and discuss research findings related to CRT Discuss the process of becoming culturally responsive Discuss culturally responsive instructional strategies Teacher performance assessment systems such as the Danielson Framework for Teaching (Danielson, 2013) highlight the need for teachers to demonstrate deep and comprehensive knowledge of their students. Such an understanding on the part of teachers has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on student learning and behavior (Durlak, 2011). a 2010 report published by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) notes that “children learn best when educators are skilled in applying developmental principles effectively to maximize student academic, social, and emotional development.” (p. 15). The report further notes that “teacher knowledge of the social, emotional, and cognitive domains, coupled with the ability to effectively apply strategies based on developmental principles, translates to increased student engagement and improved learning outcomes” (NCATE, 2010, p. 2). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2007) identified key principles that they view as collectively serving to improve teaching practice by broadening teachers’ understanding of children. Among them are 1) teaching requires not only a knowledge of content, but an understanding of children (individually, culturally, and developmentally), 2) teachers must understand how children are influenced by environments outside of school, and 3) teachers must understand how socioemotional development influences learning. 2 Constructivist Theory Cognitive Constructivism (Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental Theory ) Social Constructivism (Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory) 3 Cognitive Constructivism- Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental Theory (1896-1980) There are two major aspects to his theory: the process of coming to know and the stages we move through as we gradually acquire this ability. 4 The Process of Coming to Know- Adaptation Adaptation (which consists of assimilation, accommodation and equilibration) is driven by a biological drive to obtain balance between schemes and the environment (equilibration). Adaptation, cognitive growth, and discovery 5 Stages Of Development Sensorimotor stage (birth – 2) Preoperational stage (2 – 7) Concrete operational stage (7 – 11) Formal Operations (11-15 to death) 6 Piaget’s Theory: Implications for Teachers (Slavin, 2005) A focus on the process of children’s thinking, not just its products Recognition of the crucial role of children’s self-initiated, active involvement in learning activities A de-emphasis on practices aimed at making children adult-like in their thinking Acceptance of individual differences in developmental progress 7 Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (1896-1934) Cognitive development is a function of our interactions with more skilled and more sophisticated partners. Interpsychological vs. Intrapsychological Zone of Proximal Development Scaffolding 8 The Zone of Proximal Development Difference between the developmental level a child has reached and the level she is potentially capable of reaching with the guidance or collaboration of a more skilled adult or peer. Scaffolding is an instructional process in which the teacher adjusts to the child’s level of development the amount and type of support he or she provides to the child. 9 The Importance of a Developmental Perspective Teacher knowledge of the social, emotional, and cognitive domains, coupled with the ability to effectively apply strategies based on developmental principles, results in increased student engagement and improved learning outcomes. Teacher performance assessment systems such as the Danielson Framework for Teaching (Danielson, 2013) highlight the need for teachers to demonstrate deep and comprehensive knowledge of their students. Such an understanding on the part of teachers has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on student learning and behavior (Durlak, 2011). a 2010 report published by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) notes that “children learn best when educators are skilled in applying developmental principles effectively to maximize student academic, social, and emotional development.” (p. 15). The report further notes that “teacher knowledge of the social, emotional, and cognitive domains, coupled with the ability to effectively apply strategies based on developmental principles, translates to increased student engagement and improved learning outcomes” (NCATE, 2010, p. 2). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2007) identified key principles that they view as collectively serving to improve teaching practice by broadening teachers’ understanding of children. Among them are 1) teaching requires not only a knowledge of content, but an understanding of children (individually, culturally, and developmentally), 2) teachers must understand how children are influenced by environments outside of school, and 3) teachers must understand how socioemotional development influences learning. 10 Supporting Developmental Needs Through Culturally Responsive Teaching Culturally responsive teaching involves the process of coming to understand our students in terms of their strengths, their needs, their goals, their expectations, and their identities. It involves an understanding of and appreciation for our students as cultural beings whose cultural identities (such as those associated with their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status) coupled with their lived experiences outside of school influence their performance within school. The goal of culturally responsive teaching is to address the developmental needs of students by drawing on their cultural knowledge, prior experiences, and diverse performance styles to make learning more appropriate and effective for them. 11 School Performance Developmental Needs Lived Experiences Outside of School Expectations Cultural Identities Culturally Responsive Teaching Gay (2000) defines culturally responsive teaching as using the cultural knowledge, prior experiences, and performance styles of diverse students to make learning more appropriate and effective for them (p 29). 12 Becoming A Culturally Responsive Teacher 13 Awareness Knowledge Skill What are my beliefs about my students? What informs those beliefs? Being culturally responsive begins with an understanding of ourselves. 14 What Makes Teachers Developmentally and Culturally Responsive?: How they plan lessons How they create a classroom environment How they deliver instruction and assess learning 15 In Summary- Characteristics of Culturally Responsive Teachers (Gay, 2000) They establish home-school connections within the classroom, They develop a sense of community within the classroom, They create and foster engaging classroom environments, and They demonstrate that they care for their students in authentic ways 16