Fluent Essays

Examining the course objectives, reading and assignments, please provide written evidence of how you have developed, created, applied and/or evaluated course content through your submitted assignments. You will then address how the identified MSN Essential Standards applies to the final outcomes of your learning. Provide goals for future learning experiences during your progression through the MSN Program Please provide at least one example (per standard) of how you will transfer this learning to your professional practice. The submission should be APA formatted with a reference list and approximately two pages in length (a minimum of one page for each standard) to be submitted in this area. Examining the course objectives, reading and assignments, please provide written evidence of how you have developed, created, applied and/or evaluated course content through your submitted assignments. You will then address how the identified MSN Essential Standards applies to the final outcomes of your learning. Provide goals for future learning experiences during your progression through the MSN Program Please provide at least one example (per standard) of how you will transfer this learning to your professional practice. The submission should be APA formatted with reference list and approximately two pages in length (a minimum of one page for each standard) to be submitted in this area. Course Identified MSN Essential Prompts: MSN Essential I: Background for Practice from Sciences and Humanities. Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse integrates scientific findings from nursing, biopsychosocial fields, genetics, public health, quality improvement, organizational sciences for the continuous improvement of nursing care across diverse settings (AACN, 2011, p.4). MSN Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership. Recognizes that organizational and systems leadership are critical to the promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making, effective working relationships, and a systems-perspective (AACN, 2011, p. 4). MSN Essential III: Quality Improvement and Safety. Recognizes that a master’s- prepared nurse must be articulate in the methods, tools, performance measures, and standards related to quality, as well as prepared to apply quality principles within an organization (AACN, 2011, p. 4). MSN Essential VI: Health Policy and Advocacy. Recognizes the master’s-prepared nurse is able to intervene at the system level through the policy development process and to employ advocacy strategies to influence health and health care (AACN, 2011, p. 5) MSN Essential VII: Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes. Recognizes that the master’s prepared nurse, as a member and leader of interprofessional teams , communicates, collaborates, and consults with other health professionals to manage and coordinate care. (AACN, 2011,p. 5).MSN Essential IX: Master’s Level Nursing Practice Recognizes that nursing practice, at the master’s level, is broadly defined as any form of nursing intervention that influences healthcare outcomes for individuals, populations, or systems. Master’s level nursing graduates must have an advanced level of understanding of nursing and relevant sciences as well as the ability to integrate knowledge into practice. Nursing practice interventions include both direct and indirect care components (AACN, 2011, p.5). COURSE OBJECTIVES This course will provide students with the knowledge, skills, and abilities to: 1. Evaluate the employer’s mission, vision, goals, and strategic initiatives and clarify the nurse executive’s role and responsibilities in supporting the organization’s strategic plan. 1. Examine interdisciplinary role philosophies to promote collaboration and communication in the healthcare environment. 1. Compare the challenges and opportunities for the nurse executive in implementing practice-based change to improve organizational cultural and implementing outcome management systems in healthcare organizations. 1. Examine the nurse executive’s role as change agent and visionary. 1. Analyze current and future nursing workforce issues, including various healthcare discipline agendas, ethical and legal issues. 1. Recognize the nurse executive’s role in patient advocacy, policy development, and organizational leadership. 1. Evidence critical thinking skills in class discussion, written work, online assignments, and oral/visual/voice-enhanced presentations. MSN Essentials Prompt Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis: Analyses and relates MSN Essentials to academic course work and application to professional practice. 10.0 pts Exemplary Student develops and clearly articulates in well-developed paragraphs how the specific weekly essential (or essentials) applies to the diverse areas of practice within healthcare settings. 8.9 pts Acceptable Student marginally develops and clearly articulates in two paragraphs how the specific weekly essential (or essentials) applies to the diverse areas of practice within healthcare settings 8.0 pts Developing Student develops and clearly articulates one paragraph relating to the specific weekly essential (or essentials) applies to the diverse areas of practice within healthcare settings 6.9 pts Unsatisfactory Student fails to develops and clearly articulates any paragraphs how the specific weekly essential (or essentials) applies to the diverse areas of practice within healthcare settings 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of MSN Essential and Course information and its sources critically for its value, relevance and accuracy. 10.0 pts Exemplary Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied Incorporates scholarly sources that add to credibility and reliability. Sources show relevance or support to the research need or thesis statement. 8.9 pts Acceptable Makes 2 or 3 connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied. Incorporates 2 or more scholarly sources that add to credibility and reliability. Sources show relevance or support to the research need or thesis statement. 8.0 pts Developing Makes 1 or 2 connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied Uses sources that may be questionable as to credibility and reliability. Sources show minimal relevance or support to the research need or thesis statement. 6.9 pts Unsatisfactory Makes no connection between the issues identified and the core concepts studied within the course. Uses sources that may be dated or irrelevant, lacking authority or biased. Sources do not support the research need or thesis. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates an understanding of university policies regarding plagiarism and academic integrity. 10.0 pts Exemplary Consistently demonstrates an understanding of the restrictions on the legal and ethical use of information and information resources with proper use of APA formatting and by properly citing and reference all applicable written work. 8.9 pts Acceptable Demonstrates a general understanding of the restrictions on the legal and ethical use of information and information resources with proper use of APA formatting and by properly citing and reference all applicable written work. Title page and reference list are included 1-2 errors noted. 8.0 pts Developing Moderate understanding on the legal and ethical use of information and information resources with proper use of APA formatting and by properly citing and reference all applicable written work. Title page and reference list are included 2-3 errors noted. 6.9 pts Unsatisfactory Shows little or no understanding of the restrictions on the legal and ethical use of information and information resources with no use of APA formatting or by properly citing and reference all applicable written work. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recommendations 10.0 pts Exemplary Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations relating MSN essential to course, and supported by the information presented and concepts from the course. 8.9 pts Acceptable Presents 2-3specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations relating MSN essential to course, and supported by the information presented and concepts from the course. 8.0 pts Developing Presents 1-2 realistic or appropriate recommendations relating MSN essential to course with little, if any, support from the information presented and concepts from the course. 6.9 pts Unsatisfactory Does not present realistic or appropriate recommendations and offers no support from the information presented and concepts from the course. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing APA formatting 10.0 pts Exemplary Has no errors in grammar and/or spelling. All APA formatting elements included (citations, headings, reference list) 8.9 pts Acceptable Has one or two errors in grammar and/or spelling. APA formatting elements included (citations, headings, reference list) 8.0 pts Developing Has frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. Missing reference list and incorrect in text citations. 6.9 pts Unsatisfactory Has extensive errors in grammar and/or spelling. Limited formatting if any, included. 10.0 pts Total Points: 50.0 Running Head: DISCUSSION BOARD 1 1 DISCUSSION BOARD 1 2 Discussion Board 1 Name Course Tutor Date Discussion Board 1 The Mitylenian Debate holds that democracy is incapable of an empire. The action risks the fears of plots being unknown in daily relations with each other. Democracy feels the same towards allies, and they lack opportunities for reflecting on issues that can result in listening to their appeals or addressing their compassion. When democracy tries to become imperial, they face constant change where they have threatened and the perceptions that ignorance of the fact that bad and rigid laws are ideal for a city compared to good laws with no authority. They have to face the ignorance that unlearned loyalty is more serviceable than quick-witted insubordination. Ordinary people have great tendencies for better managing public issues than their gifted counterparts. Such behaviors are prerequisites for ruining a nation. The Melian Dialogue In treating each other, democracies should compromise on their individual rights. This implies that if democracy has to maintain its independence, it must be considered strong and protected from molestation. The subject of security and peace between nations should be fundamental, especially for the weaker democracies. Their relationship should be built on justice that is necessary for honoring the interests of each other. The democracies need to build their relationship as neutral friends rather than enemies.