3 part assignment - Nursing
please see attached
A. Create a computer-generated mind map that identifies a main idea that contributes to or impedes joy in work and includes the following factors:
• three individual factors
• three team or department factors
• three organizational factors
Note: This assessment requires you to submit an original computer-generated diagram. You may use the software program of your choice. Save and submit your mind map as a PDF or Word document (i.e., DOC or DOCX). Using another file type may cause the file to be too large to submit.
Note: A “main idea” could be a concept, a strategy, or an idea.
B. Using the attached “Force Field Analysis Template,” complete a force field analysis that includes the following components:
• one recommendation of a social communication strategy or technology strategy for implementing the “Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Framework for Improving Joy in Work” (see Supporting Documents) in the workplace
• five facilitating forces for implementing the recommendation
• five restraining forces against implementing the recommendation
• one score for each of the ten identified forces
• one “Facilitating Forces Total Score”
• one “Restraining Forces Total Score”
• one “Force Field Analysis Total Score”
Note: This assessment requires you to complete the force field analysis using the “Force Field Analysis Template” in the Supporting Documents section. Save and submit your force field analysis as a PDF or Word document (i.e., DOC or DOCX). Using another file type may cause the file to be too large to submit.
C. Write a reflection paper (suggested length of 4-6 pages) discussing how to use social and emotional intelligence power skills to handle difficult workplace situations and implement joy in the workplace by doing the following:
1. Describe, using scholarly sources, how advanced professional nurses can manage difficult workplace situations by using each of the following social and emotional intelligence power skills:
• self-awareness
• self-management
• interpersonal communication
• executive function
• social awareness
2. Describe how you, as an advanced professional nurse, would use two of the social and emotional intelligence power skills in the workplace to achieve each of the following results:
• a professional presence
• enhanced mindfulness in healthcare
• a positive social presence to promote a sense of caring and belonging
• a culture of joy to solve the problem of incivility in the workplace and initiate organizational change
3. Discuss how you, as an advanced professional nurse leader, would implement the four steps from the “IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work” (see Supporting Documents) in the workplace, including one strategy for each of the four steps.
4. Include three or more scholarly sources in your reflection paper.
JOY IN THE WORKPLACE FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS
Force Field Analysis Template
In the table below, list your recommendation of a social communication strategy or technology strategy for implementing the “Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Framework for Improving Joy in Work” in the workplace. Then, list five facilitating forces and five restraining forces for and against implementing this recommendation.
Using the following scale, score each of your facilitating and restraining forces from 1 to 5 according to the degree of influence each force would have on your recommendation:
1 = very weak
2 = slightly weak
3 = neither weak nor strong
4 = slightly strong
5 = very strong
To calculate the “Facilitating Forces Total Score”, add your five scores for the facilitating forces and enter this number in the last row of the chart.
To calculate the “Restraining Forces Total Score”, add your five scores for the restraining forces and enter this number in the last row of the chart.
To calculate the “Force Field Analysis Total Score”, substract the “Restraining Forces Total Score” from the “Facilitating Forces Total Score” and enter this number in the middle column of the last row of the chart. If the difference is positive, move forward with implementing the recommendation. If the difference is negative, reconsider implementing the recommendation.
Score
(1-5)
Facilitating Forces for Recommendation
Recommendation
Restraining Forces against Recommendation
Score
(1-5)
Facilitating Forces Total Score:
Force Field Analysis
Total Score:
Restraining Forces Total Score:
IHI Framework for
Improving Joy in Work
AN IH I RES OUR CE
20 University Road, Cambridge, MA 02138 • ihi.org
How to Cite This Paper: Perlo J, Balik B, Swensen S, Kabcenell A, Landsman J, Feeley D. IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work. IHI
White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2017. (Available at ihi.org)
WHITE P APER
AUTHORS:
Jessica Perlo, MPH: Network Director, IHI Open School
Barbara Balik, RN, EdD: Senior Faculty, IHI, and Co-founder, Aefina
Partners
Stephen Swensen, MD: Medical Director for Professionalism and
Peer Support, Intermountain Healthcare, and Senior Fellow, IHI
Andrea Kabcenell, RN: Vice President of Innovation, IHI
Julie Landsman: Project Coordinator, IHI
Derek Feeley: President and CEO, IHI
Acknowledgments:
IHI would like to thank the following organizations for their contribution to the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in
Work: American Medical Association; Barry–Wehmiller; Baylor Scott & White Health; Bellin Health Systems; Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center; Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Gaylord Hotels; Google; Healthcare Transformation Project
at ILR School of Cornell University; Hospitality Quotient; Hospital Quality Institute; Iora Health; Mayo Clinic; Menlo
Innovations; Samueli Institute; Service Employees International Union; Starbucks; Veterans Health Administration; and
Zappos. We would also like to thank the following organizations that participated in prototype testing of the framework:
American Association of Critical Care Nurses; Charleston Area Medical Center; Glen Cove Hospital, Northwell Health;
iMatter NHS Scotland; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust; Kaiser Permanente Erwin Street Medical Offices; Mount
Auburn Hospital Labor and Delivery; Nemours/Alfred I. DuPont Hospital for Children Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; NHS
Highland; Penn State Altoona Nursing Department; University of Michigan Cardiac Intensive Care Unit; and University of
Virginia School of Nursing.
The authors are grateful for the thought leadership provided by IHI Leadership Alliance members who participated in the
Joy in Work Workgroup and helped to frame the basic concepts as they apply to health care. We also thank Jane Roessner,
Val Weber, and Don Goldmann of IHI for their support in developing and editing this white paper. The authors assume full
responsibility for any errors or misrepresentations.
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) is a leading innovator in health and health care improvement worldwide. For more than 25 years, we have
partnered with a growing community of visionaries, leaders, and frontline practitioners around the globe to spark bold, inventive ways to improve the
health of individuals and populations. Together, we build the will for change, seek out innovative models of care, and spread proven best practices. To
advance our mission, IHI is dedicated to optimizing health care delivery systems, driving the Triple Aim for populations, realizing person- and family-
centered care, and building improvement capability. We have developed IHI’s white papers as one means for advancing our mission. The ideas and
findings in these white papers represent innovative work by IHI and organizations with whom we collaborate. Our white papers are designed to share the
problems IHI is working to address, the ideas we are developing and testing to help organizations make breakthrough improvements, and early results
where they exist.
Copyright © 2017 Institute for Healthcare Improvement. All rights reserved. Individuals may photocopy these materials for educational, not-for-profit uses, provided that the
contents are not altered in any way and that proper attribution is given to IHI as the source of the content. These materials may not be reproduced for commercial, for-profit use
in any form or by any means, or republished under any circumstances, without the written permission of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 3
Contents
Foreword 4
Executive Summary 5
Introduction 5
Four Steps for Leaders 8
IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work 16
Measuring Joy in Work 21
Conclusion 22
Appendix A: “What Matters to You?” Conversation Guide 23
Appendix B: Change Ideas for Improving Joy in Work 27
Appendix C: Assessment Tools for Improving Joy in Work 33
References 38
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 4
Foreword
Okay, I admit it. “Joy in work” sounds flaky. That was the reaction a friend of mine had when I
suggested a couple of years ago that she add that to the strategic goals she was exploring with her
team on a day-long management retreat. She did try, and her report back to me was this: “They
hated it. They said, ‘Get real! That’s not possible.’”
Sad to say, I suspect that may still be the response of all too many workgroups and leaders, both
inside and outside health care. “Hunkering down,” “getting through the day,” “riding out the
storm” — these are much more familiar attitudes in inevitably stressed work environments, as truly
good people try hard to cope with systems that don’t serve them well, facing demands they can, at
best, barely meet. The closest most organizations come to “joy” is “TGIF” parties — “Thank
goodness it’s Friday. I made it through another week.”
It has long seemed a paradox to me that such depletion of joy in work can pervade as noble and
meaningful an enterprise as health care. What we in the healing professions and its support roles
get to do every day touches the highest aspirations of a compassionate civilization. We have chosen
a calling that invites people who are worried and suffering to share their stories and allow us to
help. If any work ought to give spiritual satisfaction to the workers, this is it. “Joy,” not “burnout,”
ought to rule the day.
In our work in health care, joy is not just humane; it’s instrumental. As my colleague Maureen
Bisognano has reminded us, “You cannot give what you do not have.” The gifts of hope, confidence,
and safety that health care should offer patients and families can only come from a workforce that
feels hopeful, confident, and safe. Joy in work is an essential resource for the enterprise of healing.
Good news! Joy is possible. We know it is possible, not only from intuition, but also from science.
This IHI White Paper summarizes a surprisingly large literature on theory and evidence about
factors, such as management behaviors, system designs, communication patterns, operating
values, and technical supports, that seem associated with better or worse morale, burnout, and
satisfaction in work. It also cites a growing number of health care organizations that are innovating
in pursuit of joy in work, and often getting significant, measurable results. (One of those
organizations is IHI, itself, whose local projects are worth studying.)
Since joy in work is a consequence of systems, quality improvement methods and tools have a role
in its pursuit. That is to say: organizations and leaders that want to improve joy can do so using the
same methods of aim setting, tests of change, and measurement that they use in the more familiar
terrain of clinical and operational process improvement.
So, listen up! “Joy in work” is not flaky, I promise you. Improving joy in work is possible,
important, and effective in pursuit of the Triple Aim. This IHI White Paper will help you get
started. And you might well find that the joy it helps uncover is, in large part, your own.
Donald M. Berwick, MD
President Emeritus and Senior Fellow
Institute for Healthcare Improvement
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 5
Executive Summary
With increasing demands on time, resources, and energy, in addition to poorly designed systems of
daily work, it’s not surprising health care professionals are experiencing burnout at increasingly
higher rates, with staff turnover rates also on the rise. Yet, joy in work is more than just the
absence of burnout or an issue of individual wellness; it is a system property. It is generated (or
not) by the system and occurs (or not) organization-wide. Joy in work — or lack thereof — not only
impacts individual staff engagement and satisfaction, but also patient experience, quality of care,
patient safety, and organizational performance.
This white paper is intended to serve as a guide for health care organizations to engage in a
participative process where leaders ask colleagues at all levels of the organization, “What matters
to you?” — enabling them to better understand the barriers to joy in work, and co-create
meaningful, high-leverage strategies to address these issues.
The white paper describes the following:
x The importance of joy in work (the “why”);
x Four steps leaders can take to improve joy in work (the “how”);
x The IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work: nine critical components of a system for
ensuring a joyful, engaged workforce (the “what”);
x Key change ideas for improving joy in work, along with examples from organizations that
helped test them; and
x Measurement and assessment tools for gauging efforts to improve joy in work.
Introduction
If burnout in health care were described in clinical or public health terms, it might well be called an
epidemic. The numbers are alarming. A 2015 study found over 50 percent of physicians report
symptoms of burnout.1 Thirty-three percent of new registered nurses seek another job within a
year, according to another 2013 report.2 Turnover is up, and morale is down.
Burnout affects all aspects of the pursuit of better health and health care. It leads to lower levels of
staff engagement, which correlate with lower customer (patient) experience, lower productivity,
and an increased risk of workplace accidents. These all significantly affect the financial vitality of
an organization. The impact on patient care is even more worrying. Lower levels of staff
engagement are linked with lower-quality patient care, including safety, and burnout limits
providers’ empathy — a crucial component of effective and person-centered care.
So, what can leaders do to counteract this epidemic? The Institute for Healthcare Improvement
(IHI) believes an important part of the solution is to focus on restoring joy to the health care
workforce. With this in mind, IHI developed four steps leaders can take to improve joy in work
(the “how”); and the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work — critical components of a system
for ensuring a joyful, engaged workforce (the “what”). Together, they serve as a guide for health
care organizations, teams, and individuals to improve joy in work of all colleagues.
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 6
To inform this work, IHI led three 90-day Innovation Projects on Joy in Work in 2015–2016, with
the goal of designing and testing a framework for health systems to improve joy in work. The
Innovation Projects comprised scans of the current published literature on engagement,
satisfaction, and burnout; more than 30 expert interviews based on the literature scan, including
interviews with patients and exemplar organizations both within and outside of health care; site
visits; and, finally, learning from 11 health and health care systems working to improve joy in work
as they participated in a two-month prototype program testing steps, refining the framework, and
identifying ideas for improvement.
In addition to presenting the four steps and the framework, this white paper describes specific
changes to test, discusses practical issues in measuring joy in work, presents examples from
organizations involved in testing and implementation, and includes self-assessment tools for
health care organizations looking to understand their current state.
Why Use the Term “Joy in Work”?
Why “joy in work”? And why now? Some may think focusing on joy in health care — a physically,
intellectually, and emotionally demanding profession — is a distant goal. But focusing on joy is
important for three fundamental reasons.
First, focusing on joy, as opposed to focusing only on burnout or low levels of staff engagement,
accords with an approach applied to solving many intractable problems in heath and health care.
It’s tempting to analyze a problem by only paying attention to deficits or gaps. But to get to
solutions, it is essential to identify, understand, and leverage all the assets that can be brought to
bear, and joy is one of health care’s greatest assets. Health care is one of the few professions that
regularly provides the opportunity for its workforce to profoundly improve lives. Caring and
healing should be naturally joyful activities. The compassion and dedication of health care staff are
key assets that, if nurtured and not impeded, can lead to joy as well as to effective and empathetic
care. This assets-based approach to improvement enables people to look at issues from different
perspectives, which often leads to designing more innovative solutions.
The sociologist Aaron Antonovksy taught us to think of health as more than merely the absence of
disease. Health is about coherence, he said — a sense that life is comprehensible, manageable, and
meaningful.3 Following Antonovsky’s lead, the second reason to focus on joy in work is because joy
is about more than the absence of burnout. Joy, like Antonovsky’s conception of health, is about
connections to meaning and purpose. By focusing on joy through this lens, health care leaders can
reduce burnout while simultaneously building the resilience health care workers rely on each day.
Again, the goal is to design innovative solutions by looking at issues from a different perspective.
The third reason for focusing on joy takes us back to W. Edwards Deming. His 14 Points for
Management, first presented in his book Out of the Crisis, address joy, but use different terms.
Consider, for example, Point 11, “Remove barriers that rob the hourly worker of his right to pride of
workmanship,” and Point 12, “Remove barriers that rob people in management and in engineering
of their right to pride of workmanship.” For Deming, “pride of workmanship” and “joy” were highly
related, if not interchangeable.4 Later in life, Deming increasingly emphasized the importance of
joy in work. In his final lectures, he routinely stated that “Management’s overall aim should be to
create a system in which everybody may take joy in [their] work.” Ensuring joy is a crucial
component of the “psychology of change,” one of the cornerstones of Deming’s scientific approach
to improvement. In addition to being a core part of his theory of improvement, joy in work, to
Deming, was also a fundamental right. It is up to leaders, he argued, to ensure that workers can
enjoy that right.
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 7
Fairness and Equity as Contributors to Joy in Work
Individuals who experience unfairness and inequity at work, or even outside of work, feel
disempowered and will likely disengage, regardless of the basis for the inequity. Links have been
made between race and ethnicity and wellbeing, showing various racial and ethnic groups
experiencing less joy in work. The National Health Service in England went about measuring this
within their environment and found significant disparities between the experience of white
employees and that of black, minority, and ethnic employees. They went further to show that the
sites with the highest rates of discrimination against minorities had the lowest patient experience
scores. Besides indicating toxic environments for individuals and teams, addressing racism and
inequity in the workplace becomes a quality-of-care imperative.5
Focusing on equity can also lead to improving joy in work. For example, Henry Ford Health
System’s emphasis on health care equity has been a driver of employee engagement. They
administered a Gallup Employee Engagement survey and found that employees involved in health
care equity work were seven times more engaged than other employees. The IHI White Paper,
Achieving Health Equity: A Guide for Health Care Organizations, offers a framework for health
care organizations to improve health equity for their staff and the communities they serve.6
Regardless of the approach taken, health care organizations need the full engagement of all staff
members in the mission. If individuals disengage, group output becomes less diverse, opinions are
marginalized, decisions and performance suffer, and consequently, patients suffer.7 When
everyone is engaged in an equitable and diverse environment, they feel as though they can listen to
what matters to patients and colleagues; comfortably ask questions, request help, or challenge
what’s happening; and use teamwork to successfully solve challenges. All of these contribute to a
positive work experience and enable the entire team to experience joy in work.
The Case for Improving Joy in Work
Perhaps the best case for improving joy is that it incorporates the most essential aspects of positive
daily work life. A focus on joy is a step toward creating safe, humane places for people to find
meaning and purpose in their work.
There is also a strong business case for improving joy in work. Recognizing that joy does not yet
have a single validated measure, which we’ll discuss more in the measurement section, the
business case draws on outcomes of the work environment, including engagement, satisfaction,
patient experience, burnout, and turnover rates.
Engagement is an imprecise but often-used proxy measure for joy. An engaged workforce is one
that holds a positive attitude toward the organization and its values, and is foundational to creating
high-performing organizations.8 When researchers studied human capital management drivers,
they found that traditional Human Resources metrics (e.g., average time to fill open positions and
total hours of training provided) do not predict organizational performance. Rather, a score of
human capital drivers including employee engagement, among other factors, was more relevant.9 A
UK study also demonstrated the relationship of performance and profitability with employee
engagement.10 These and other studies confirm the intuitive: improving engagement contributes to
improved performance.11 It enables greater professional productivity with lower turnover rates. Joy
in work, in turn, improves patient experience, outcomes, and safety, resulting in substantially
lower costs.12
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 8
Many have documented this correlation between greater employee satisfaction and safer, more
efficient patient care.13 There is ample evidence that management practices to produce a joyful,
engaged workforce are associated with fewer medical errors and better patient experience;14 less
waste; higher employee productivity;15 and more discretionary effort on the part of staff and
reduced turnover, leading to better financial performance.16
Studies have also shown a link between job dissatisfaction and plans for leaving a job. By
considering employee turnover as a factor that’s associated with joy in work, it is possible to make
an explicit financial case as well. One study showed that lost revenue for replacing one full-time
equivalent (FTE) physician is $990,034, plus recruitment costs of $61,200 and annual start-up
costs of $211,063. That means replacing one departing physician and on-boarding a new physician
will cost the organization more than $1 million ($1,262,297).17 Finally, measuring joy and sharing
the measurement results externally helps attract and retain top performers to an organization.18
Four Steps for Leaders
As IHI engaged with partners in thinking about how to restore, foster, and nurture joy in the health
care workforce, it became evident that leaders often find it challenging to see a way to move from
the current state to “joy in work.” Here are four steps leaders can take to find a path forward.
Figure 1. Four Steps for Leaders
Figure 1 depicts the steps as stairs, to illustrate that each step serves as the foundation for the steps
that follow. First, leaders engage colleagues to identify what matters to them in their work (Step 1).
Next, leaders identify the processes, issues, or circumstances that are impediments to what matters
— the “pebbles in their shoes” that get in the way of meeting professional, social, and psychological
needs (Step 2).19 Then, in partnership, multidisciplinary teams come together and share
responsibility for removing these impediments (focusing on nine critical components), and for
improving and sustaining joy (Step 3). Leaders and staff use improvement science together to
accelerate improvement and create a more joyful and productive place to work (Step 4).
The four steps do not ignore the larger organizational issues, or “boulders,” that exist, such as the
impact of electronic health record functionality on clinicians’ daily work, or workload and staffing
issues. Rather, the steps empower local teams to identify and address impediments they can
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 9
change, while larger system-wide issues that affect joy in work are also being prioritized and
addressed by senior leaders. This process converts the conversation from “If only they would…” to
“What can we do today?” It helps everyone see the organization as “us” and not “them.”
Creating joy and engagement in the workplace is a key role of effective leaders. IHI’s High-Impact
Leadership Framework describes leaders’ actions that make them effective, from being an
authentic presence at the front line to staying focused on mission and what matters, and identifies
attention to joy in work as a major component of the leadership role.20 These leadership actions
also give meaning to work, promote camaraderie, and are essential to improving joy. Similarly,
everything we know about improving safety in health care relies on ensuring a fair and just culture,
effective teams, and daily improvement — those things that also contribute to joy in work.21 Safety,
effective leadership, and a joyful workforce are inextricably linked.
Get Ready
Before launching into Step 1, three “Get Ready” actions will establish a foundation for success. To
embark on the steps without making these preparations risks derailing well-intentioned plans.
x Prepare for the “What matters to you?” conversations: These are rich, learning
conversations — not intended to communicate information, but rather to listen and learn.
Leaders are often ill equipped to have effective conversations with colleagues, and many put
off these important dialogues because of two primary concerns: 1) What if colleagues ask for
things I can’t do? and 2) How am I going to fix all the things they identify? Leaders rightly
fear an avalanche of issues falling on them that they are unable to address effectively. Leaders
and colleagues should recognize this is a different approach than the usual “I tell you what
isn’t working and you fix it” approach. See Appendix A for a guide to conducting effective
“What matters to you?” conversations and resolving issues that arise from such
conversations. The guide helps leaders get started quickly and learn as they go.
x Ensure leader capacity at all levels of the organization: Leaders at the local level
(e.g., program, department, or clinic) — referred to as “core leaders” in this paper — are
tasked with guiding the work to improve joy in work in their respective areas. These leaders
need the capacity (i.e., time to do the work and improvement science skills) and skill to
facilitate the “What matters?” conversations, and to act on the issues that surface. Identifying
impediments and then not acting on them intensifies rather than diminishes cynicism. For
example, one organization testing these steps asked staff about impediments, but was unable
to act at that time. A year later, when leaders returned to colleagues to ask about “What
matters?” they were met with frustration — staff were hesitant to participate further because
nothing had happened after their previous input. During prototype testing, sites found that
they could begin tests of change on some local impediments almost immediately, especially if
they broke these down into smaller segments. Sites that made progress on reaching their aims
designated skilled and committed core leaders who facilitated improvement immediately,
rather than waiting for an external resource team.
x Designate a senior leader champion: Optimally, joy in work is an organization-wide
strategy, led by senior leaders and involving colleagues and leaders at all levels. Core leaders
need to have at least one senior leader as a champion when issues arise that go beyond the
scope of their local leadership. The champion also takes on the “boulders” that are too big for
a local unit, and begins to address them in the larger organization.
WHITE PAPER: IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work
Institute for Healthcare Improvement • ihi.org 10
Step 1. Ask staff, “What matters to you?”
This step is about asking the right questions and really listening to the answers to identify what
contributes to — or detracts from — joy in work for staff (see Appendix A for a “What Matters to
You?” Conversation Guide).22 For many years, IHI has been promoting the transformative
provocation to ask patients, “What matters to you?” in addition to “What’s the matter?”23 Health
care leaders need to ask the health care workforce the same question. Only by understanding what
truly matters to staff will senior management be able to identify and remove barriers to joy.
During the IHI prototype testing, some sites found it helpful to start with identifying a senior
leader champion who commits to making joy in work a shared responsibility at all levels (Step 3).
Highlighting senior leader support enabled staff to feel more comfortable bringing up issues and
being honest about what matters to them. At these sites, teams needed assurance that change was
an option before they were willing to share. Whether or not a champion is identified at the outset,
leaders can support the process and show a genuine interest in the wellbeing of individuals and
teams by regularly engaging colleagues in discussions to identify the unique local and
organizational opportunities to improve joy in work.24
Discovering what matters relies heavily on trusting relationships and assumes that leaders know
how to listen. This is not always the case. Strong leaders use effective listening and communication
skills to involve others, build consensus, and influence decisions. Teams have found success with
using communication boards, surveys, regular staff meetings or more informal meetings to engage,
inform, and listen. Identifying what matters need not take a lot of time. However, what works in
one setting may not work in another. It’s up to leaders to find the method that works best for their
colleagues and fits into the daily or weekly workflow.
By beginning with asking “What matters?” leaders engage in a form of appreciative inquiry that
taps into strengths or bright spots, or what’s already working in the organization, that offer energy
for change. Conversation questions may include:
x What makes for a good day for you?
x What makes you proud to work here?
x When we are at our best, what does that look like?
This then sets the context for asking what gets in the way of a good day or what makes for a bad day.
When leaders and team members are frank about what makes for a bad day, whether it is an
overload of patients in a clinic or an inability to act on patients’ wishes for care, leaders and
colleagues share the problems and ultimately the solutions. This creates a sense of “we are in this
together.” While leaders may not take immediate action on all issues, the conversation establishes
a place to start to make the work environment and …
CATEGORIES
Economics
Nursing
Applied Sciences
Psychology
Science
Management
Computer Science
Human Resource Management
Accounting
Information Systems
English
Anatomy
Operations Management
Sociology
Literature
Education
Business & Finance
Marketing
Engineering
Statistics
Biology
Political Science
Reading
History
Financial markets
Philosophy
Mathematics
Law
Criminal
Architecture and Design
Government
Social Science
World history
Chemistry
Humanities
Business Finance
Writing
Programming
Telecommunications Engineering
Geography
Physics
Spanish
ach
e. Embedded Entrepreneurship
f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models
g. Social-Founder Identity
h. Micros-enterprise Development
Outcomes
Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada)
a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami
Calculus
(people influence of
others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities
of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these (
American history
Pharmacology
Ancient history
. Also
Numerical analysis
Environmental science
Electrical Engineering
Precalculus
Physiology
Civil Engineering
Electronic Engineering
ness Horizons
Algebra
Geology
Physical chemistry
nt
When considering both O
lassrooms
Civil
Probability
ions
Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years)
or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime
Chemical Engineering
Ecology
aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less.
INSTRUCTIONS:
To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:
https://www.fnu.edu/library/
In order to
n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading
ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.
Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear
Mechanical Engineering
Organic chemistry
Geometry
nment
Topic
You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts)
Literature search
You will need to perform a literature search for your topic
Geophysics
you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes
Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience
od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages).
Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in
in body of the report
Conclusions
References (8 References Minimum)
*** Words count = 2000 words.
*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.
*** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)"
Electromagnetism
w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care. The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases
e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management. Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management.
visual representations of information. They can include numbers
SSAY
ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3
pages):
Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada
making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner.
Topic: Purchasing and Technology
You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class
be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique
low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.
https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0
Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo
evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program
Vignette
Understanding Gender Fluidity
Providing Inclusive Quality Care
Affirming Clinical Encounters
Conclusion
References
Nurse Practitioner Knowledge
Mechanics
and word limit is unit as a guide only.
The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su
Trigonometry
Article writing
Other
5. June 29
After the components sending to the manufacturing house
1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend
One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard. While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or
Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business
No matter which type of health care organization
With a direct sale
During the pandemic
Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record
3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i
One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015). Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev
4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal
Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate
Ethics
We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities
*DDB is used for the first three years
For example
The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case
4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972)
With covid coming into place
In my opinion
with
Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA
The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be
· By Day 1 of this week
While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013)
5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda
Urien
The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle
From a similar but larger point of view
4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open
When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition
After viewing the you tube videos on prayer
Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages)
The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough
Data collection
Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an
I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option. I would want to find out what she is afraid of. I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an
Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych
Identify the type of research used in a chosen study
Compose a 1
Optics
effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte
I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources
Be 4 pages in length
soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test
g
One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research
Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti
3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family
A Health in All Policies approach
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum
Chen
Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change
Read Reflections on Cultural Humility
Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing
Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section
Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott
Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident