Discussion Three - Management
You are assuming a position as department chair at a university. The Dean has directed that you establish a faculty mentoring program for your department. Below are the four steps of the faculty mentoring program from UNC that you have been given as a guide. Which parts of the four step program would you use and what are the critical parts of a mentoring plan you would focus on. Please follow APA 7th Ed. student paper format and limit your paper to THREE or less pages (plus Cover page and references. Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Agreement Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Introduction: The Department of Allied Health Sciences supports mentoring at all levels of faculty development and ranks. We wish to facilitate professional growth, aid in faculty retention and use the talents of more experienced faculty members in faculty development. Mentoring plans (see mentoring plan form) are developed for all assistant professors on either fixed term or tenure track, or any associate professor who wishes to participate in the program. The mentoring plan should involve 2-5 mentors as appropriate to the faculty member’s goals. This committee is encouraged to include faculty members from outside DAHS and UNC-Chapel Hill. This mentoring team will assist the faculty member’s development and achievement of scholarly excellence, and is not a performance evaluation. The faculty member and the mentors should be proactive in both defining expectations for one another and setting a regular meeting schedule; although, frequency will vary according to the needs of the faculty member. Expectations: The mentoring team will help guide the faculty member in developing a program consistent with the expectations of their division for scholarly, teaching, and service activities; and assist the faculty member in meeting these career development goals in a timely fashion. The mentoring team, along with the faculty member’s division director, will guide the faculty member toward building an academic identity and body of scholarship, learning the institutional culture and developing a network of experts locally and nationally. The mentors, together with the faculty member, will develop a specific mentoring plan and help the faculty member in achieving their goals. Mentoring types can include research, teaching, academic career guidance, skill development, personal development and professional development. The mentoring plan can include objectives such as submission of publications of dissertation or postdoctoral research, preparation of manuscripts on new research, drafting and submission of research proposals for extramural support, identification of potential research collaborators and development of coursework materials for teaching responsibilities. The mentoring team will assist the mentee’s development in developing research proposals and will provide peer reviews of proposals and scholarly works and help the mentee obtain appropriate supports and interdisciplinary consultations. The mentoring committee and faculty member will meet as a full team at least twice a year, but are encouraged to meet more often or provide individual mentoring opportunities on a specified schedule (see mentoring plan) as best meets the needs of the mentee. A log of the meetings, including progress toward the specified objectives, should be maintained by the faculty member. The mentoring team will provide the Division Director and Department Chair with a brief report each year documenting the faculty member’s development and his/her success in meeting developmental timelines and milestones. This agreement will last for the approximate time period until promotion, and then informally thereafter. Everything discussed in the agreement will be confidential unless otherwise specified at the time of the discussion. This mentoring agreement sets forth the objectives that the mentors and faculty member commit to working on together. All agree to follow the guidelines of this agreement for the period specified and to make a good faith effort to resolve any issues that may arise between them. This mentoring relationship may be dissolved (in writing) by any party. In that case, discussion should involve the division director so alternate mentoring plans can be devised. We agree to enter into a team mentoring relationship: ________________________________ (Faculty Member) date ____/____/____ ________________________________ (Primary Mentor) date ____/____/____ ________________________________ (Mentor) date ____/____/____ ________________________________ (Mentor) date ____/____/____ ________________________________ (Division Director) date ____/____/____ Faculty Member: Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Committee Meeting Form Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 This form is to be filled out after each mentoring session. At a minimum, two of these reports must be submitted each year Faculty Member: _____________________ Date of Meeting: ______________________ Mentors Present: _____________________ _____________________ _____________________ 1. Topics of Discussion: 2. Career plans: 3. Assessment of overall job satisfaction: 4. Other issues/concerns: 5. Mentoring committee assessment of progress toward established goals: Signatures: Faculty Member Date Primary Mentor Date The Mentee will provide a copy of this report to the Department Chair, Division Director, and the Mentoring Program Coordinator Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Plan Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 STEP 1: IDENTIFY MENTOR COMMITTEE Capitalize on the experience and knowledge of faculty members within and outside the Department of Allied Health Sciences. STEP 2: LIST GOALS Define the goals you wish to achieve, and capitalize on the skills and knowledge of your mentoring committee to facilitate goal accomplishment and provide accountability as an AHS faculty member. GOALS: SHORT TERM/LONG TERM STRATEGIES TIMEFRAME TEACHING CLINICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE RESEARCH OTHER STEP 3: DEVELOP A MEETING SCHEDULE The full committee is required to meet at least twice a year, but individual meetings with mentors are encouraged throughout the year. DATE: DATE: PRIMARY MENTOR NAME TITLE DEPARTMENT 1. MENTOR NAMES TITLE DEPARTMENT 2. 3. Faculty Member: DATE: Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development Program Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Revised May 2018 The Faculty Mentoring and Development Program will help provide faculty with support, direction, accountability and intentional academic guidance through collaboration with experienced faculty mentors. The program will:  Foster general support for faculty members to thrive in the academic health center environment  Stimulate development of a successful career plan based on teaching, clinical practice, professional service, and research  Review academic activities, ensuring that they meet established performance goals  Facilitate productive networking and collaborative partnerships, both inside and outside the Department of Allied Health Sciences and the University of North Carolina  Help identify funding opportunities and provide support for improved productivity  Provide written feedback for the faculty member, Division Director, and Department Chair Faculty members who are on the UNC main campus and at the rank of Assistant Professor will participate. The faculty member’s Division Director, with input from the Department Chair, will ensure that the individual is participating in the program. Other (non-Assistant) faculty members are not required to participate but are encouraged to do so if they and/or their Division Director feel that the program will help them achieve their academic goals. The faculty member will have both a Primary Mentor and a Faculty Mentoring Committee to help meet the goals of the program. PURPOSE Mentoring Support Development Meet Established Goals Facilitate Networking Identifying Funding Opportunities Written Feedback ELIGIBLE FACULTY Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development Program Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Revised May 2018 The creation of one’s Mentoring Committee is one of the early and important opportunities to take charge of one’s career, as is the initiative with which one makes use of their committee. The faculty member and the Division Director will propose committee members by submitting to the Mentoring Program Coordinator minimum of 3 individuals from both the Department of Allied Health Sciences and other appropriate departments inside and outside of UNC. Faculty members will begin assembling their committee as they begin their appointment in the Department, under the approval of the Department Chair. The composition of committees may change over time, reflecting change and evolution in scholarly interests. Ideally, at least one individual from outside of Allied Health Sciences will be included on each committee. Among identified committee candidates, the primary mentor will serve as chair of the committee, but the position can be held by other interested members. The Department Chair and/or the Mentoring Program Coordinator will ask each of the committee candidates if they are willing to serve on the committee. Once at least three members have agreed to serve, they will receive information on committee composition, chair designation, goals of the program and next steps.  The faculty member will meet with the entire mentoring committee at least once a year for Fixed Term faculty and twice a year for Tenure Track faculty.  One member of the committee will be designated as the primary mentor and will be responsible for meeting regularly with the faculty member. The frequency of these meetings will vary according to the faculty member’s needs and mission focus.  The faculty member will provide the mentoring group with both short-term and long-term goals on an annual basis. The committee will provide appropriate written feedback. The faculty member will receive written feedback after each committee meeting. The faculty member must provide a copy of the feedback to their Department Chair, Division Director, and Mentoring Program Coordinator. These reports will serve as part of the documentation of faculty member performance during annual faculty member reviews and for promotion and tenure applications. Reminders that meetings and reports are due will be issued periodically by the Mentoring Program Coordinator. However, the chairperson and mentee share responsibility and should work together with the committee chair to schedule meetings. FACULTY MENTORING COMMITTEE FACULTY MENTORING COMMITTEE ACTIVITY WRITTEN FEEDBACK Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development Program Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Revised May 2018 The faculty member will develop a formal plan for academic development that will include specifics about goals and further training. The faculty member and primary mentor will meet regularly and will focus on progress toward the goals of the plan and consideration as to how the plan should be modified, per changes in the faculty member’s focus. Under the mentor’s guidance, the faculty member will develop core academic skills, including but not limited to:  Oral communications and presentations  Scholarly writing and critiques  Grant, program, and/or contract development  Academic and other professional networking and collaboration  Leadership and professionalism training  Annual discussion with mentee about their team contributions 1. Will established mentoring committees be incorporated into this program? a. If an existing mentoring committee, for example related to the K Award, is working well and fits the program’s description, there is no need to replace that committee. Faculty members who have questions about whether an existing committee is sufficient should contact Dr. Stephen Hooper. 2. Who makes sure mentee assessments are completed? What’s done with the committee’s recommendations, and what if they are not practical? a. It is the faculty member's responsibility to organize the meetings, define goals and supply them to the mentoring committee. The Primary Mentor is responsible for completing and submitting the assessment form annually, with input from the faculty member and other committee members. The assessment forms are given to the Division Director initially, then to Dr. Hooper for review. Committee recommendations will be highly considered, which serves to benefit the mentees. The Division Director and Dr. Hooper will alert the faculty member and their respective committee to recommendations that seem impractical. 3. Mentors outside of the Department: How do mentees find them, and what is their incentive for mentoring Allied Health Sciences Faculty? a. Faculty members should ask their Division Director and others (such as other collaborators) for recommendations. The likelihood of a positive response to a faculty member’s request for mentorship is high. The Department will continue discussions about how best to reward/thank faculty members who act as mentors, both in and outside of the Department. 4. Must mentors hold higher ranks than the people they are mentoring? a. No, as long as their experience and expertise are appropriate to serve in a mentoring role for that faculty member. 5. Is the mentoring program mostly for researchers? a. No. It is for all faculty members regardless of mission focus. COMMON QUESTIONS EXPECTATIONS FOR FACULTY MEMBER AND PRIMARY MENTOR Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development Program Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Revised May 2018 6. Will clinical performance be addressed/managed by this program? a. No. The mentoring program is to support faculty member development, not evaluate a faculty member’s clinical performance. 7. Can the committee change over time? a. Yes. If the faculty member’s focus changes, it may be appropriate to change the committee membership. 8. Who decides how often the committee meets? a. The mentoring committee and faculty member shall meet at least one time annually for fixed term faculty and twice annually for tenure track. The frequency of meetings between primary mentor and faculty member will vary according to the needs and focus of the faculty member. McCabe, L. L., & McCabe, E. R. (2010). How to Succeed in Academics (2nd Edition). Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press. National, A. O. S. S., National, A. O. E. S., & Institute, O. M. S. (1997). Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press Tobin, M. J. (2004). Mentoring: Seven roles and some specifics. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 170 (2), 114-7. Personal Best—Top Athletes and Singers have Coaches. Should You? http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/03/111003fa_fact_gawande?currentPa Things to Do Together During Mentor-Mentee Meetings: NIH-HHS Mentoring Program http://trainingcenter.nih.gov/PDF/mentoring/Things_to_do_together.pdf SUGGESTED RESOURCES http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/03/111003fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all http://trainingcenter.nih.gov/PDF/mentoring/Things_to_do_together.pdf Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development Program Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040 Revised May 2018 UNC Center for Faculty Excellence website, mentoring section http://cfe.unc.edu/mentoring/index.html http://cfe.unc.edu/mentoring/index.html
CATEGORIES
Economics Nursing Applied Sciences Psychology Science Management Computer Science Human Resource Management Accounting Information Systems English Anatomy Operations Management Sociology Literature Education Business & Finance Marketing Engineering Statistics Biology Political Science Reading History Financial markets Philosophy Mathematics Law Criminal Architecture and Design Government Social Science World history Chemistry Humanities Business Finance Writing Programming Telecommunications Engineering Geography Physics Spanish ach e. Embedded Entrepreneurship f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models g. Social-Founder Identity h. Micros-enterprise Development Outcomes Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada) a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami Calculus (people influence of  others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities  of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these ( American history Pharmacology Ancient history . Also Numerical analysis Environmental science Electrical Engineering Precalculus Physiology Civil Engineering Electronic Engineering ness Horizons Algebra Geology Physical chemistry nt When considering both O lassrooms Civil Probability ions Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years) or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime Chemical Engineering Ecology aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less. INSTRUCTIONS:  To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:  https://www.fnu.edu/library/ In order to n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.  Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear Mechanical Engineering Organic chemistry Geometry nment Topic You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts) Literature search You will need to perform a literature search for your topic Geophysics you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages). Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in in body of the report Conclusions References (8 References Minimum) *** Words count = 2000 words. *** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style. *** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)" Electromagnetism w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care.  The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management.  Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management. visual representations of information. They can include numbers SSAY ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3 pages): Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner. Topic: Purchasing and Technology You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.         https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0 Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will   finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program Vignette Understanding Gender Fluidity Providing Inclusive Quality Care Affirming Clinical Encounters Conclusion References Nurse Practitioner Knowledge Mechanics and word limit is unit as a guide only. The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su Trigonometry Article writing Other 5. June 29 After the components sending to the manufacturing house 1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard.  While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business No matter which type of health care organization With a direct sale During the pandemic Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record 3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015).  Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev 4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate Ethics We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities *DDB is used for the first three years For example The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case 4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972) With covid coming into place In my opinion with Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be · By Day 1 of this week While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013) 5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda Urien The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle From a similar but larger point of view 4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition After viewing the you tube videos on prayer Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages) The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough Data collection Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option.  I would want to find out what she is afraid of.  I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych Identify the type of research used in a chosen study Compose a 1 Optics effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources Be 4 pages in length soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test g One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti 3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family A Health in All Policies approach Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum Chen Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change Read Reflections on Cultural Humility Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident