Discussion Three - Management
You are assuming a position as department chair at a university. The Dean has directed that you establish a faculty mentoring program for your department. Below are the four steps of the faculty mentoring program from UNC that you have been given as a guide. Which parts of the four step program would you use and what are the critical parts of a mentoring plan you would focus on.
Please follow APA 7th Ed. student paper format and limit your paper to THREE or less pages (plus Cover page and references.
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Agreement
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Introduction: The Department of Allied Health Sciences supports mentoring at all levels of faculty
development and ranks. We wish to facilitate professional growth, aid in faculty retention and use the
talents of more experienced faculty members in faculty development. Mentoring plans (see mentoring
plan form) are developed for all assistant professors on either fixed term or tenure track, or any
associate professor who wishes to participate in the program. The mentoring plan should involve 2-5
mentors as appropriate to the faculty member’s goals. This committee is encouraged to include
faculty members from outside DAHS and UNC-Chapel Hill. This mentoring team will assist the faculty
member’s development and achievement of scholarly excellence, and is not a performance
evaluation. The faculty member and the mentors should be proactive in both defining expectations for
one another and setting a regular meeting schedule; although, frequency will vary according to the
needs of the faculty member.
Expectations: The mentoring team will help guide the faculty member in developing a program
consistent with the expectations of their division for scholarly, teaching, and service activities; and
assist the faculty member in meeting these career development goals in a timely fashion. The
mentoring team, along with the faculty member’s division director, will guide the faculty member
toward building an academic identity and body of scholarship, learning the institutional culture and
developing a network of experts locally and nationally.
The mentors, together with the faculty member, will develop a specific mentoring plan and help the
faculty member in achieving their goals. Mentoring types can include research, teaching, academic
career guidance, skill development, personal development and professional development. The
mentoring plan can include objectives such as submission of publications of dissertation or
postdoctoral research, preparation of manuscripts on new research, drafting and submission of
research proposals for extramural support, identification of potential research collaborators and
development of coursework materials for teaching responsibilities. The mentoring team will assist the
mentee’s development in developing research proposals and will provide peer reviews of proposals
and scholarly works and help the mentee obtain appropriate supports and interdisciplinary
consultations.
The mentoring committee and faculty member will meet as a full team at least twice a year, but are
encouraged to meet more often or provide individual mentoring opportunities on a specified schedule
(see mentoring plan) as best meets the needs of the mentee. A log of the meetings, including
progress toward the specified objectives, should be maintained by the faculty member. The
mentoring team will provide the Division Director and Department Chair with a brief report each year
documenting the faculty member’s development and his/her success in meeting developmental
timelines and milestones.
This agreement will last for the approximate time period until promotion, and then informally
thereafter. Everything discussed in the agreement will be confidential unless otherwise specified at
the time of the discussion. This mentoring agreement sets forth the objectives that the mentors and
faculty member commit to working on together. All agree to follow the guidelines of this agreement for
the period specified and to make a good faith effort to resolve any issues that may arise between
them. This mentoring relationship may be dissolved (in writing) by any party. In that case, discussion
should involve the division director so alternate mentoring plans can be devised.
We agree to enter into a team mentoring relationship:
________________________________ (Faculty Member) date ____/____/____
________________________________ (Primary Mentor) date ____/____/____
________________________________ (Mentor) date ____/____/____
________________________________ (Mentor) date ____/____/____
________________________________ (Division Director) date ____/____/____
Faculty Member:
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Committee
Meeting Form
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
This form is to be filled out after each mentoring session. At a minimum, two of these reports
must be submitted each year
Faculty Member: _____________________ Date of Meeting: ______________________
Mentors Present: _____________________ _____________________ _____________________
1. Topics of Discussion:
2. Career plans:
3. Assessment of overall job satisfaction:
4. Other issues/concerns:
5. Mentoring committee assessment of progress toward established goals:
Signatures:
Faculty Member Date
Primary Mentor Date
The Mentee will provide a copy of this report to the Department Chair, Division Director, and
the Mentoring Program Coordinator
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring Plan
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
STEP 1: IDENTIFY MENTOR COMMITTEE Capitalize on the experience and knowledge of faculty members within and
outside the Department of Allied Health Sciences.
STEP 2: LIST GOALS Define the goals you wish to achieve, and capitalize on the skills and knowledge of your mentoring
committee to facilitate goal accomplishment and provide accountability as an AHS faculty member.
GOALS: SHORT TERM/LONG TERM STRATEGIES TIMEFRAME
TEACHING
CLINICAL
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE
RESEARCH
OTHER
STEP 3: DEVELOP A MEETING SCHEDULE The full committee is required to meet at least twice a year, but individual
meetings with mentors are encouraged throughout the year.
DATE:
DATE:
PRIMARY MENTOR NAME TITLE DEPARTMENT
1.
MENTOR NAMES TITLE DEPARTMENT
2.
3.
Faculty Member: DATE:
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development
Program
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Revised May 2018
The Faculty Mentoring and Development Program will help provide faculty with support, direction,
accountability and intentional academic guidance through collaboration with experienced faculty
mentors.
The program will:
Foster general support for faculty members to thrive in the academic health center
environment
Stimulate development of a successful career plan based on teaching, clinical practice,
professional service, and research
Review academic activities, ensuring that they meet established performance goals
Facilitate productive networking and collaborative partnerships, both inside and
outside the Department of Allied Health Sciences and the University of North Carolina
Help identify funding opportunities and provide support for improved productivity
Provide written feedback for the faculty member, Division Director, and Department Chair
Faculty members who are on the UNC main campus and at the rank of Assistant Professor will
participate. The faculty member’s Division Director, with input from the Department Chair,
will ensure that the individual is participating in the program. Other (non-Assistant) faculty
members are not required to participate but are encouraged to do so if they and/or their
Division Director feel that the program will help them achieve their academic goals.
The faculty member will have both a Primary Mentor and a Faculty Mentoring Committee
to help meet the goals of the program.
PURPOSE
Mentoring
Support
Development
Meet
Established
Goals
Facilitate
Networking
Identifying
Funding
Opportunities
Written
Feedback
ELIGIBLE FACULTY
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development
Program
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Revised May 2018
The creation of one’s Mentoring Committee is one of the early and important opportunities
to take charge of one’s career, as is the initiative with which one makes use of their
committee. The faculty member and the Division Director will propose committee members
by submitting to the Mentoring Program Coordinator minimum of 3 individuals from both the
Department of Allied Health Sciences and other appropriate departments inside and outside
of UNC. Faculty members will begin assembling their committee as they begin their
appointment in the Department, under the approval of the Department Chair. The
composition of committees may change over time, reflecting change and evolution in
scholarly interests.
Ideally, at least one individual from outside of Allied Health Sciences will be included on each
committee. Among identified committee candidates, the primary mentor will serve as chair
of the committee, but the position can be held by other interested members. The
Department Chair and/or the Mentoring Program Coordinator will ask each of the committee
candidates if they are willing to serve on the committee. Once at least three members have
agreed to serve, they will receive information on committee composition, chair designation,
goals of the program and next steps.
The faculty member will meet with the entire mentoring committee at least once a
year for Fixed Term faculty and twice a year for Tenure Track faculty.
One member of the committee will be designated as the primary mentor and will be
responsible for meeting regularly with the faculty member. The frequency of these
meetings will vary according to the faculty member’s needs and mission focus.
The faculty member will provide the mentoring group with both short-term and
long-term goals on an annual basis. The committee will provide appropriate
written feedback.
The faculty member will receive written feedback after each committee meeting. The
faculty member must provide a copy of the feedback to their Department Chair, Division
Director, and Mentoring Program Coordinator. These reports will serve as part of the
documentation of faculty member performance during annual faculty member reviews
and for promotion and tenure applications.
Reminders that meetings and reports are due will be issued periodically by the Mentoring
Program Coordinator. However, the chairperson and mentee share responsibility and
should work together with the committee chair to schedule meetings.
FACULTY MENTORING COMMITTEE
FACULTY MENTORING COMMITTEE ACTIVITY
WRITTEN FEEDBACK
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development
Program
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Revised May 2018
The faculty member will develop a formal plan for academic development that will include
specifics about goals and further training. The faculty member and primary mentor will meet
regularly and will focus on progress toward the goals of the plan and consideration as to how
the plan should be modified, per changes in the faculty member’s focus. Under the mentor’s
guidance, the faculty member will develop core academic skills, including but not limited to:
Oral communications and presentations
Scholarly writing and critiques
Grant, program, and/or contract development
Academic and other professional networking and collaboration
Leadership and professionalism training
Annual discussion with mentee about their team contributions
1. Will established mentoring committees be incorporated into this program?
a. If an existing mentoring committee, for example related to the K Award, is working well
and fits the program’s description, there is no need to replace that committee. Faculty
members who have questions about whether an existing committee is sufficient should
contact Dr. Stephen Hooper.
2. Who makes sure mentee assessments are completed? What’s done with the committee’s
recommendations, and what if they are not practical?
a. It is the faculty member's responsibility to organize the meetings, define goals and supply them
to the mentoring committee. The Primary Mentor is responsible for completing and submitting
the assessment form annually, with input from the faculty member and other committee
members. The assessment forms are given to the Division Director initially, then to Dr. Hooper
for review. Committee recommendations will be highly considered, which serves to benefit the
mentees. The Division Director and Dr. Hooper will alert the faculty member and their respective
committee to recommendations that seem impractical.
3. Mentors outside of the Department: How do mentees find them, and what is their incentive for
mentoring Allied Health Sciences Faculty?
a. Faculty members should ask their Division Director and others (such as other collaborators) for
recommendations. The likelihood of a positive response to a faculty member’s request for
mentorship is high. The Department will continue discussions about how best to reward/thank
faculty members who act as mentors, both in and outside of the Department.
4. Must mentors hold higher ranks than the people they are mentoring?
a. No, as long as their experience and expertise are appropriate to serve in a mentoring role for
that faculty member.
5. Is the mentoring program mostly for researchers?
a. No. It is for all faculty members regardless of mission focus.
COMMON QUESTIONS
EXPECTATIONS FOR FACULTY MEMBER AND PRIMARY MENTOR
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development
Program
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Revised May 2018
6. Will clinical performance be addressed/managed by this program?
a. No. The mentoring program is to support faculty member development, not evaluate a
faculty member’s clinical performance.
7. Can the committee change over time?
a. Yes. If the faculty member’s focus changes, it may be appropriate to change the
committee membership.
8. Who decides how often the committee meets?
a. The mentoring committee and faculty member shall meet at least one time annually for
fixed term faculty and twice annually for tenure track. The frequency of meetings
between primary mentor and faculty member will vary according to the needs and focus
of the faculty member.
McCabe, L. L., & McCabe, E. R. (2010). How to Succeed in Academics (2nd Edition). Berkeley, CA, USA:
University of California Press.
National, A. O. S. S., National, A. O. E. S., & Institute, O. M. S. (1997). Adviser, Teacher, Role Model,
Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC, USA: National
Academies Press
Tobin, M. J. (2004). Mentoring: Seven roles and some specifics. American Journal of Respiratory and
Critical Care Medicine, 170 (2), 114-7.
Personal Best—Top Athletes and Singers have Coaches. Should You?
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/03/111003fa_fact_gawande?currentPa
Things to Do Together During Mentor-Mentee Meetings: NIH-HHS Mentoring Program
http://trainingcenter.nih.gov/PDF/mentoring/Things_to_do_together.pdf
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/03/111003fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all
http://trainingcenter.nih.gov/PDF/mentoring/Things_to_do_together.pdf
Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) Faculty Mentoring and Development
Program
Mentoring Program Coordinator: Dani Burkhart [email protected] (919) 966-9040
Revised May 2018
UNC Center for Faculty Excellence website, mentoring section
http://cfe.unc.edu/mentoring/index.html
http://cfe.unc.edu/mentoring/index.html
CATEGORIES
Economics
Nursing
Applied Sciences
Psychology
Science
Management
Computer Science
Human Resource Management
Accounting
Information Systems
English
Anatomy
Operations Management
Sociology
Literature
Education
Business & Finance
Marketing
Engineering
Statistics
Biology
Political Science
Reading
History
Financial markets
Philosophy
Mathematics
Law
Criminal
Architecture and Design
Government
Social Science
World history
Chemistry
Humanities
Business Finance
Writing
Programming
Telecommunications Engineering
Geography
Physics
Spanish
ach
e. Embedded Entrepreneurship
f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models
g. Social-Founder Identity
h. Micros-enterprise Development
Outcomes
Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada)
a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami
Calculus
(people influence of
others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities
of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these (
American history
Pharmacology
Ancient history
. Also
Numerical analysis
Environmental science
Electrical Engineering
Precalculus
Physiology
Civil Engineering
Electronic Engineering
ness Horizons
Algebra
Geology
Physical chemistry
nt
When considering both O
lassrooms
Civil
Probability
ions
Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years)
or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime
Chemical Engineering
Ecology
aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less.
INSTRUCTIONS:
To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:
https://www.fnu.edu/library/
In order to
n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading
ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.
Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear
Mechanical Engineering
Organic chemistry
Geometry
nment
Topic
You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts)
Literature search
You will need to perform a literature search for your topic
Geophysics
you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes
Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience
od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages).
Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in
in body of the report
Conclusions
References (8 References Minimum)
*** Words count = 2000 words.
*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.
*** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)"
Electromagnetism
w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care. The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases
e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management. Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management.
visual representations of information. They can include numbers
SSAY
ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3
pages):
Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada
making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner.
Topic: Purchasing and Technology
You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class
be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique
low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.
https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0
Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo
evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program
Vignette
Understanding Gender Fluidity
Providing Inclusive Quality Care
Affirming Clinical Encounters
Conclusion
References
Nurse Practitioner Knowledge
Mechanics
and word limit is unit as a guide only.
The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su
Trigonometry
Article writing
Other
5. June 29
After the components sending to the manufacturing house
1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend
One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard. While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or
Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business
No matter which type of health care organization
With a direct sale
During the pandemic
Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record
3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i
One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015). Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev
4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal
Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate
Ethics
We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities
*DDB is used for the first three years
For example
The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case
4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972)
With covid coming into place
In my opinion
with
Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA
The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be
· By Day 1 of this week
While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013)
5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda
Urien
The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle
From a similar but larger point of view
4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open
When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition
After viewing the you tube videos on prayer
Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages)
The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough
Data collection
Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an
I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option. I would want to find out what she is afraid of. I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an
Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych
Identify the type of research used in a chosen study
Compose a 1
Optics
effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte
I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources
Be 4 pages in length
soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test
g
One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research
Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti
3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family
A Health in All Policies approach
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum
Chen
Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change
Read Reflections on Cultural Humility
Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing
Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section
Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott
Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident