Fluent Essays

During Week 3, we will examine agenda setting in more depth with an emphasis on interest group involvement and the role of chief executives in the agenda setting process. This discussion on policy formulation will give you some additional insight into the development of legislation. Your Learning Objectives for the Week: Apply and interpret the stages in the policy making process. Critique the practical aspects of how one might influence the policy process through the political process.MHA6050 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION AND PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS Week 3 Discussion Due March 4 at 11:59 PM   Supporting Lectures: Review the following lecture: · Policy Formulation: Development of Legislation Legislative Process for Health Policy Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review the link “ Doing Discussion Questions Right ”, the expanded grading rubric for the forum, and any specific instructions for this topic. Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit your responses in the Discussion Area. While hundreds of bills are introduced during each congressional session, only a very small percentage moves on to be evaluated by the President. Understanding the legislative process for health policy is important for administrators, who are in a position to lobby for effective health policy. From the Internet, review the following: · U.S. Congress. (n.d.). Health. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/subjects/health/6130 Choose a healthy policy item that has been “Introduced” and present the following: · Title of the bill · Status and sponsor       · Summary · Recommended revisions To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the  South University Online Library . As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Your posting should be a minimum of 200 words in length. Submit your posting to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to use the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Follow-up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week. Week 3 Project  Due March 7 at 11:59 PM Instructions Supporting Lectures: Review the following lecture: · Policy Formulation: Agenda Setting Examining the Individual Mandate The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires all US citizens and legal residents to obtain qualifying health coverage. In this week, you will explore the Individual Mandate section of the new health reform law. Tasks: · Explain the Individual Mandate included in the Patient Protection and ACA including the tax penalties that will be imposed if a person or a family does not obtain qualifying health coverage. · Analyze the eligibility criteria for exemptions and subsidies to obtain coverage. · Explain one policy change or enhancement you would recommend if you were required to ensure the success of the Individual Mandate included in the Patient Protection and ACA and justify the intended outcome. From the Internet, review the following: · HealthCare.gov. (n.d.). The fee for not having health insurance. Retrieved from https://www.healthcare.gov/fees/fee-for-not-being-covered/ · Jost, T. (2017, August 21). TMHA6050 WEEK 3 LECTURE 1 Policy Formulation: Agenda Setting The existence of health-related societal problems does not automatically trigger policy changes that solve such problems. Each problem needs to be understood including all its complexity, solutions and potential solutions need to be identified, and the current political circumstances need to be understood in order to assess the will of the pubic as well as law makers. As it happens, the problems that are identified as important or urgent get immediate attention from policymakers. Aggressive congressional intervention usually depends on its public salience and the degree of group conflict surrounding it. Some problems gain traction simply due to a confluence of events and political ripeness. Potential solutions to problems may not be readily present and will need formulation. Alternatively, policy making can be slowed if there are several potential solutions, each favored by a different interest group. Analysis plays a key role in identifying optimal solutions for inclusion in a policy. Apart from an analysis of advantage-to-disadvantage of alternative solutions, there should always be an awareness of unintended consequences and room for evolution. In this regard, data driven analysis with quantifiable results always has a better chance of finding a place on the policy agenda. All other things being equal, the existence or lack of political will, may render an agenda stagnant. The political circumstance surrounding each problem-potential solution is a crucial third variable in creating a window of opportunity. Additionally, the influence and tenor of interest groups play a pivotal role in moving agendas forward. Sometimes, individual policymakers seem to make frustratingly counterintuitive decisions, and it may be because of how much power a certain interest group may wield over them. Interest groups may use strategies such as lobbying, campaigning through advertisements, organized protests, electioneering, litigation, as well as monetary “carrot and stick” tactics. Lastly, chief executives such as presidents, governors, mayors, etc. also influence policy agenda. Stages of Agenda Setting Review each stage to learn more about it. Identifying a Problem · Problems must be important and urgent · Problems must stimulate disagreement between interest groups · Problems must present an incentive for legislators Identifying Possible Solutions · A feasible solution must be presented to advance a problem into the policy-making process · Numerous solutions should not be presented as it introduces competition · Competing proposals make agenda setting difficult Political Circumstances · Political will or political force can make policymakers act · Heavily influenced by public attitudes, concerns, and opinions · Supported by interest groups and the chief executive Additional Materials From your course textbook, Health Policymaking in the United States, read the following chapter: · Polic3/2/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6050-Regulation & Policy in Healthcare SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75084&evalObjectId=365956&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=6576&gr… 1/3 Response No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points Criterion Score Quality of Initial Posting / 20No initial posting exists to evaluate. The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation. The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment. The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed. The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in- depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings. Participation No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-6) 6 points Satisfactory (C: 7-8) 8 points Proficient (B: 9) 9 points Exemplary (A: 10) 10 points Criterion Score Participation in Discussion / 10No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum. May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other students post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful 3/2/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6050-Regulation & Policy in Healthcare SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75084&evalObjectId=365956&evalObjectType=5&userId=4903/2/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6050-Regulation & Policy in Healthcare SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75084&evalObjectId=372974&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=223143&… 1/3 Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points Proficient (B range) (24–26) 26 points Exemplary (A range) (27–30) 30 points Criterion Score Explained the Individual Mandate included in the Patient Protection and ACA including the tax penalties that will be imposed if a person or a family does not obtain qualifying health coverage. / 30Student did not submit assignment. Work does not meet assignment expectations; shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts. Assignment partially meets expectations with minimal depth; demonstrates a limited understanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment meets expectations with all components being addressed; demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignments concepts. Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points Proficient (B range) (24–26) 26 points Exemplary (A range) (27–30) 30 points Criterion Score Analyzed the eligibility criteria for exemptions and subsidies to obtain coverage. / 30Student did not submit assignment. Work does not meet assignment expectations; shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts. Assignment partially meets expectations with minimal depth; demonstrates a limited understanding of the assignment concepts. Assignment meets expectations with all components being addressed; demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignments concepts. Assignment exceeds expectations with exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize 3/2/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6050-Regulation & Policy in Healthcare SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75084&evalObjectId=372974&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=223143&… 2/3 key assignment concepts. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D range) (1–34) 34 points Satisfactory (C range) (35–39) 39 points Proficient (B range) (40–44) 44 points Exemplary (A range) (45–50) 50 points Criterion Score Explained one policy change or enhancement you would recommend if you were required to ensure success of the Individual Mandate included in the Patient Protection and ACA and justify the intended o