Fluent Essays

I will need 9 full pages, if you wont do it DO NOT TAKE the assignment. The file (Diversity in the Workplace and Strategic Planning) is the subject and the information of what you are going to write about. Please follow in the file name (603 paper instructions) and follow the rubric this paper has a lot of points, the paper will be evaluated based on the attached rubric. I also uploaded a previous file to avoid mistakes (EmadMSA 601 paper).  This paper needs 7th edition APA Format, I uploaded an exampleDiversity in the Workplace and Strategic Planning Diversity is connected to transformational leadership, SWOT analysis, business plan development, and market assessment, develop divers marketing strategy to make sure that include divers’ group of people bae on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs. etc. Diverse work environments require the careful assessment of employees to determine whether it would be possible to achieve business objectives. Transformational leadership is applicable here and is connected to paper 2 since the style inspires a workforce to perform beyond expectations. The employees get thoroughly trained and assessed to ensure they share in the company’s vision. During such processes, it is possible for the diverse workforce to put aside of factors limiting their effectiveness so that it is possible for them to perform required tasks. Diversity is connected to SWOT analysis since the technique studies all internal and external aspects of a business. It is possible to determine whether a company has strengths that can get promoted. Weakness and threats in the diverse environment would be solved before any negative outcomes.The minimum length is eight (8) pages with a maximum of ten (10) pages. If you look at the examples that we gave you in the document “MSA 698 Research Data Support,” you will find that the only thing that is constant for each paper would be “John Doe Administration.” For example, here are the titles that one could generate for each paper in the John Doe Administration:  Strategic Planning and John Doe Administration Besides, according to some scholars, good titles in academic research papers have several characteristics: • The title accurately addresses the subject and scope of the study. • The title should not have any abbreviations. • Make sure that one uses only words that create a positive impression and stimulate reader interest. • Always use a current nomenclature from the field of study/concentration. • Make a concerted effort to identify critical variables, both dependent and independent. • In many cases, you might want to reveal how the paper will be organized. • There are times that you might suggest a relationship between variables which supports the primary hypothesis. • It is limited to 10 to 15 substantive words – shorter is much better. • Make sure it does not include the study of, analysis of, or similar constructions. • Many titles are usually in the form of a phrase. However, it can also be in the form of a question. • Always use correct grammar and capitalization with all first words and last words capitalized, including the first word of a subtitle. All nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs that appear between the first and last words of the title are also capitalized. • In academic papers, rarely is a title followed by an exclamation mark. However, a title or subtitle can be in the form of a question. Again, looking at the above, we could have a generic title that could cut across all papers as “An Effective John Doe Administration.” As one might see, this is a short, simple, and to the point title. Another example could be “John Doe: An Effective John Doe Administration.” Nevertheless, if one did not start with a generic title, one would create a title for each assignment, as seen with the four paper illustrations above. In the end, a generic title is best because we can cover any body of knowledge of research. Therefore a generic title is best, and you will not have to generate a title for each paper. At that point, you will need only to cover the “same issue, or organization, or problem” for each essay/paper. The papers must include the following: • Title Page. The title should be descriptive and suggest the paper’s purpose • Table of Contents • Contain an introduction, body of the paper, and conclusion. • Appendices (if applicable): • Reference List (every citation in the Text must be correctly listed in the Reference List) There must be 6 to 10 scholarly references per paper. If you have more than one Table, a List of Tables Page follows the Table of Contents If you have morMaster of Science in Administration Project Paper Partial Fulfillment for MSA 698 Rubric for MSA 603 Paper Student Name: Student I.D. Number: Concentration: Project Title: Program Center: EPN: Semester/Year for MSA 698: Instructor’s Name: Instructions Course instructors are required to use this rubric for the individual papers, MSA 601, 602, 603, and 604. Compute the total points and insert the grade based on the grading scale at the bottom of this form. Dimension and Percentage Weight MSA Instructor (Score & Feedback) Assessment (10 points) Score: Relationship to Concentration and Administration This paper reflects an administrative approach to examining an issue directly related to the student’s concentration. Specify the student’s concentration in the feedback box. Core Course Objectives (20 points) Score: Does the paper reflect current strategic planning theory and protocols? Does the paper apply analytical models and decision-making methods to evaluate and solve administrative problems and enhance organizational performance? Does the paper demonstrate an ability to incorporate into practice exemplary ethical principles leading to sound personal decisions and socially responsible organizational values and practices? Does the paper demonstrate a solid understanding of the objectives of MSA 603? Paper Introduction, Body of the Paper and Conclusion (45 points) Score: Does the introduction adequately support the contents of the paper? Is there a natural progression from the introduction through to the conclusion of the paper? Does the paper explain how this core course fits in with the other core courses? Does the paper use strategic planning in the proper context? Does the conclusion fully summarize the contents of the paper? References (10 points) Score: Are the references in compliance with the latest APA style manual? Are references scholarly and sufficient in number to support the paper. There should be no less than 6 scholarly references. Are sources in the text properly listed on the reference pages, and vice-versa? Writing Format (15 points) Score: Executive summary is not over one page. Demonstrates proper English usage, spelling, and context Proofread for spelling, typing, and grammatical errors. References in text and on reference page follow current APA style, Proper citation All elements conform to the latest edition of the APA Style Manual Writing reflects graduate work. Total Points (Possible 100 Points) Total Score: Grade: Grading Scale: 94-100\% A 90-93\% A- 87-89\% B+ 84-86\% B 80-83\% B- 77-79\% C+ 74-76\% C <74\% E Instructor’s Name: Title: Date: 1 - Rubric for MRunning Head: ENSURING DIVERSITY IN THE WORKFORCE 1 ENSURING DIVERSITY IN THE WORKFORCE 2 Always save your paper with your name and title! Ensuring Diversity in the Workforce John Doe Central Michigan University Master of Science in Administration MSA 698: Directed Administrative Portfolio Dr. Larry F. Ross February 28, 2021 Ensuring Diversity in the Workforce Introduction Diversity in the place of work is a very important aspect of any organization. This is one of the most popular business environment subjects, primarily because of the changing demographics. Diversity in the workplace and organizational behavior has a significant impact on employment trends and business and public organizations. This has mostly been due to the increased globalization. Globalization is a multifaceted and versatile phenomenon. It involves intercontinental integration as a product of the exchange where there is a universal exchange of nationwide and cultural resources in this process. Therefore, it is essential to acknowledge, understand, accept, value, and celebrate differences among people concerning their class, ethnicity, gender, race, sexual orientation, spirituality, and other differences. Diversity and inclusion at the workplace yield dividends in many respects, while a lack of diversity and inclusion acts as a tax on work teams engagement and performance (Fujimoto, & Härtel, 2017). This paper will look at how individual behaviors, leadership, and communication affect workplace diversity and organizational behaviors. Fostering open-mindedness in an organization One of the best ways to foster open-mindedness in an organization is to promote inclusiveness and diversity within an organization. This is done by ensuring that the workforce comprises people from various backgrounds, ethnicities, races, ages, gender and ensuring that everybody is on board. This creates high-quality business intellect and helps the organization better recognize clients, workers, and consumers globally, and make it an enriching environment for everybody. APA problem corrected! According to Fujimoto and Härtel, “America was built upon an assortment of races and various ethnic backgrounds. The population has continued growing, and the immigrants continue to increase every day” (p. 1121). Many subcultures have been formed, which illustrates the significance of ensuring that this diversity is also reflected in our places of work. Organizations have realized that there are many benefits to managing the company’s workforce diversity. The significant benefits that are realized by the proper management of diversity are organizational performance and better people management. Individual Behaviors of Employees The behavior of an individual is how a person behaves. The behaviors of an individual are a very important aspect to consider when setting the accomplishment of something. For instance, in a company, the owners behavior and the leadership sets the goalCOMPARISON OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING 1 Executive Summary COMPARISON OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING 2 Comparison of Student Evaluations of Teaching with Online and Paper-Based Administration John F. Doe Central Michigan University Master of Science in Administration MSA 698: Directed Administrative Portfolio Dr. Larry F. Ross September 28, 2020 Author Note Data collection and preliminary analysis were sponsored by the Office of the Provost and the Student Assessment of Instruction Task Force. Portions of these findings were presented as a poster at the 2016 National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Claudia J. Stanny, Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University of West Florida, Building 53, 11000 University Parkway, Pensacola, FL 32514, United States. Email: [email protected] mailto:[email protected] COMPARISON OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING 3 Table of Contents (optional) COMPARISON OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING 4 Comparison of Student Evaluations of Teaching with Online and Paper-Based Administration Student ratings and evaluations of instruction have a long history as sources of information about teaching quality (Berk, 2013). Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) often play a significant role in high-stakes decisions about hiring, promotion, tenure, and teaching awards. As a result, researchers have examined the psychometric properties of SETs and the possible impact of variables such as race, gender, age, course difficulty, and grading practices on average student ratings (Griffin et al., 2014; Nulty, 2008; Spooren et al., 2013). They have also examined how decision-makers evaluate SET scores (Boysen, 2015a, 2015b; Boysen et al., 2014; Dewar, 2011). In the last 20 years, considerable attention has been directed toward the consequences of administering SETs online (Morrison, 2011; Stowell et al., 2012) because low response rates may have implications for how decision-makers should interpret SETs. Online Administration of Student Evaluations Administering SETs online creates multiple benefits. Online administration enables instructors to devote more class time to instruction (vs. administering paper-based forms) and can improve the integrity of the process. Students who are not pressed for time in class are more likely to reflect on their answers and write more detailed comments (Morrison, 2011; Stowell et al., 2012; Venette et al., 2010). Because electronic aggregation of responses bypasses the time-consuming task of transcribing comments (sometimes written in challenging handwriting), instructors can receive summary data and verbatim comments shortly after the close of the term instead of weeks or months into the following ter