Fluent Essays

Need to do a project analysis for the case study about Over-land Trucking and Freight: Relevant Costs for Decision Making and answer the questions in the word document which was provided by the professor. Need 10 pages without in APA format.[Report Title] [Name] [Business info] Executive Summary Introduction Explain the purpose of the case study, including a strong emphasis on the context of the case and an overall thesis statement. Main Text Summarize the main questions elements with support to help guide the reader to the final recommendations. Recommendations Provide a listing of recommendations and brief reasons supporting the rationale. Table of Contents (complete when report is in final review) Heading 1 x Heading 2 x Heading 3 x Heading 1 x Heading 2 x Heading 3 x Table Column Header Table Column Header Table Column Header Table Column Header Table Row Header Table text Table text Table text Table text Table Row Header Table text Table text Table text Table text Table Row Header Table text Table text Table text Table text Table Row Header Table text Table text Table text Table text Note: The table here may be used throughout the recommendation report. Please feel free to adjust based on the findings and recommendations. Methodology In this section, discuss the approach taken to complete the case study assignment. This section is where you explain how you defined the case study problem, determined what concept(s) to apply, make note of relevant quantitative/qualitative data, etc. The case study approach is a “learning by doing” activity and requires a process or methodology for assessment and completion. Here is a general list of guidelines that might provide some assistance and overall guidance in the final write-up of this section. · Read the first few paragraphs, then move through the case asking yourself, “What is the case all about? What types of data (either quantitative and/or qualitative data) is provided in the case? · Then, read the case slowly and carefully, making sure to note important facts keeping in mind the overall goal of the case. · Make note of the key problems or issues. · Perform the appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative analysis required. · Develop a set of recommendations that are supported by the analysis. Introduction In this section, introduce the case study, provide context, describe the case study problem in greater detail, and the overall purpose (e.g., to provide recommendations about…). Here is a general “Introduction” for the “Over-land Trucking and Freight” case study: The case is designed to be used to reinforce the concepts of cost behaviour and cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis and to introduce the concept of capacity. In this case, you are asked to evaluate a proposal from an existing client to expand the level of services provided. The alternatives relate to the nature of the expansion of capacity to provide the requested services. There is no need to do discounted cash flow analysis for capital budgeting purposes. Upon completing this case, you will achieve the following objectives related to the practice of management accountABSTRACT Over-land Trucking and Freight has a long-established and mutually beneficial business relationship with a major international automotive parts company, FHP Technologies. Management at FHP has approached Over-land with a request to provide additional routes that are important to the efficiency of its supply chain. Over-land’s management wishes to nurture the business relationship with FHP but is concerned about the available capacity to service the new routes, potential risks, and profitability associated with FHP’s request. INTRODUCTION Alan James founded Over-land Trucking and Freight in 1968 and has grown the business into a sizeable operation with 90 trucks and 180 trailers. His largest customer, FHP Technologies, has submitted a proposal to him to add delivery routes that would improve the efficiency of FHP’s supply chain. Alan was not certain that Over-land could handle the additional routes since the company currently was operating at (or near) full capacity. FHP offered a total of $2.15 per mile (including fuel service charge and miscellaneous fees) for the new route. But Alan knew that to accept the offer he would have to add more trucks and perhaps incur additional debt. The question was whether the rates offered by FHP were high enough to offset the associated risks of growing the fleet. Although the business had been grown organically through the years by reinvesting profits, it incurred debt from time to time to replace older equipment (usually in blocks of five trucks). Alan knew the slim profit margins associated with trucking, coupled with a downturn in the economy, could spell disaster if saddled with too much debt. See Exhibits 1 and 2 for the company’s most recent statement of income from operations and the balance sheet, respectively. Roger Simmons, Over-land’s operations manager for the past 16 years, had been reviewing the FHP proposal and approached Alan. “Alan, we need to discuss this offer from FHP. I think it is a great opportunity for our company, and we need to find a way to make it work.” Within 10 minutes Alan and Roger were in a closed-door meeting discussing the pros and cons of FHP’s offer. Roger began by stating the obvious: “Alan, this is a huge opportunity for us to grow the business. Not to mention, as FHP becomes more dependent on our services, we will be in a stronger position to negotiate future rate increases. I know you are opposed to debt, and I understand the risks of carrying more debt, but there is more than one way to grow our fleet. If you would consider using independent contract drivers, we could grow the fleet enough to accept FHP’s offer without incurring more debt.” Alan cringed at the thought of using independent contract drivers. Although independent contractors owned their own trucks, Alan viewed them as difficult to deal with and not worth the headache. “Roger, I hear you, but this n