Fluent Essays

In the progress report, you will add to the preliminary research you have done on your topic.  The format of this report is very basic. Topic: Paying College Athletes First, you will need to find at least three additional sources within the Blinn Library databases (100 words per source). You will provide a reference citation and annotate each of these three sources just as you did for the proposal essay. On a separate, additional page, you will summarize the information received in your survey analysis.  You will want to focus on the results from three to five of your questions.  The best questions to use will be the ones that received the most response information as well as support or prove your argument.  This portion of the report should discuss what implications the survey results have.  Start drawing conclusions from the information received.  Tell me how you will incorporate this primary research information into your research paper (350 words). Requirements: 650-800 words total Typed, double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman font MLA heading and format 3 annotated sources (different than the three in the proposal essay) 1-2 page summary of your survey resultsChapter Title: Young Pacific Male Athletes’ Experiences of Mental Wellbeing in Elite Rugby Union and Rugby League Chapter Author(s): Caleb Marsters and Jemaima Tiatia-Seath Book Title: Pacific Youth Book Subtitle: Local and Global Futures Book Editor(s): HELEN LEE Published by: ANU Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvt6rj8x.13 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ANU Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Pacific Youth This content downloaded from �������������64.92.176.12 on Wed, 03 Mar 2021 04:32:37 UTC�������������� All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvt6rj8x.13 247 11 Young Pacific Male Athletes’ Experiences of Mental Wellbeing in Elite Rugby Union and Rugby League Caleb Marsters and Jemaima Tiatia-Seath Introduction Young Pacific athletes in New Zealand and Australia have been increasingly linked to depression, suicide and other such adverse events, as demonstrated in Australasian media, social networking sites and recent academic studies (Horton 2014; Lakisa et al. 2014; Napier 2015; Panapa & Phillips 2014; Rodriguez & McDonald 2013; Tiatia-Seath 2015). While these events and the prominence of Pacific athletes in elite rugby union and rugby league suggest that mental health support should be a priority for this group, gaps remain in the literature relating to the mental wellbeing of young Pacific male athletes, particularly in New Zealand. Pacific peoples constitute 7.4 per cent of New Zealand’s population (Statistics New Zealand 2013), yet Pacific males account for just under 50  per cent of all provincial rugby union players in New Zealand (Field 2013) and 42 per cent of all rugby league players in the National Rugby League (NRL), an elite professional rugby league competition based in Australia and New Zealand (National Rugby League 2016). These percentages are greater in areas with higher Pacific population density, such as Auckland, where Pacific peoples constitute 14 per cent This content downloaded from �������������64.92.176.12 on Wed, 03 Mar 2021 04:32:37 UTC�������������� All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms PACIFIC YOUTH 248 of the population but comprise 55 per cent of club rugby players and 67 per cenU.S. Higher Education Effectiveness Author(s): Steven Brint and Charles T. Clotfelter Source: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences , April 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1, Higher Education Effectiveness (April 2016), pp. 2-37 Published by: Russell Sage Foundation Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.01 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.01?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Russell Sage Foundation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences This content downloaded from �������������64.92.176.12 on Wed, 03 Mar 2021 04:33:50 UTC�������������� All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.01 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.01?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.01?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents U.S. Higher Education Effectiveness s t e v e n br i n t a n d c h a r l e s t. c l o t f e lt e r This volume of RSF presents new evidence about higher education in the United States. As we use the term, higher education is synony- mous with postsecondary education and in- cludes two- year community colleges, four- year colleges, and universities that offer graduate training in addition to four- year baccalaureate degrees. As editors, we have been charged with writing an introduction that is more than a summary of the research papers to follow. In- stead, we were asked to produce an overview of the key facts and themes about U.S. higher education and its effectiveness that will be im- portant both for specialists and for readers who are new to the subject. This volume focuses on effectiveness, a topic that has not been as prominent in scholarship as we believe it should be. Scholars of higher education have been principally interested in how colleges and universities work and what forces in their environments lead them to change. But most policymakers (and most of the public) do notPrejudice or Principled Conservatism? Racial Resentment and White Opinion toward Paying College Athletes Author(s): Kevin Wallsten, Tatishe M. Nteta, Lauren A. McCarthy and Melinda R. Tarsi Source: Political Research Quarterly , MARCH 2017, Vol. 70, No. 1 (MARCH 2017), pp. 209-222 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the University of Utah Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26384911 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms and Sage Publications, Inc. are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Research Quarterly This content downloaded from �������������64.92.176.12 off:ffff:ffff on Thu, 01 Jan 1976 12:34:56 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms https://www.jstor.org/stable/26384911 Article Prejudice or Principled Conservatism? Racial Resentment and White Opinion toward Paying College Athletes Political Research Quarterly 2017, Vol. 70(1) 209-222 © 2017 University of Utah Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1065912916685186 journals.sagepub.com/home/prq ®SAGE Kevin Wallsten1, Tatishe M. Nteta2, Lauren A. McCarthy2, and Melinda R. Tarsi3 Abstract Despite its widespread use in studies of race and ethnic politics, there exists a long-standing debate about whether racial resentment primarily measures antiblack prejudice or ideological conservatism. In this paper, we attempt to resolve this debate by examining racial resentments role in shaping white opinion on a racialized policy issue that involves no federal action and no government redistribution of resources: pay for play in college athletics. Using cross-sectional and experimental data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study and Amazons Mechanical Turk, we find evidence not only that racial resentment items tap racial predispositions but also that whites rely on these predispositions when forming and expressing their views on paying college athletes. More specifically, we demonstrate that racially resentful whites who were subtly primed to think about African Americans are more likely to express opposition to paying college athletes when compared with similarly resentful whites who were primed to think about whites. Because free-market conservatism, resistance to changes in the status quo, opposition to expanding federal power, and reluctance to endorse government redistributive policies cannot possibly explain these results, we conclude that racial resentment is a valid