Fluent Essays

One of the keys to leading is understanding yourself. This week begins with an examination of a well-cultivated self and continues with creating a compelling vision. These two cornerstones are important for laying the groundwork for leadership. You will learn more about yourself and how to apply these tools to your repertoire. Your Learning Objectives for the Week: Assess personal values and leadership and interpret their relationship to emotional intelligence skills. Critique communication styles in healthcare leadership settings.MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations Week 1 Lecture 1 Leading with Conviction and Using Emotional Intelligence in Healthcare Settings Self-awareness is a vital part of everyone’s makeup. This holds true for leaders also. Understanding what you have and what you do not have is the basis of self-awareness. Looking at your own strengths and weaknesses and allowing those in your charge to provide feedback go a long way in your development. A leader who is honestly passionate about his or her people is the leader whom everyone wants to follow. To a great extent, this is leading with conviction. The competency of leading with conviction is closest to the core of leadership. To be driven by personal conviction means to be driven by how you feel things should be. Many a times, conviction comes through the experiences that a leader undergoes during his or her lifetime. Conviction is really the foundation of why we do what we do. To make this visible to those who you are leading, you must know your values and beliefs. Highly effective leaders are able to demonstrate their personal convictions. When direct reports are asked from peers, the responses would include phrases like “highly principled” or “stands for what they believe in.” Simply having strong conviction is not the end of the line. Effective leaders must also be able to keep them under control. Additionally, they must recognize that while their convictions drive them, they are not universally accepted. Others may and will have other convictions. An effective leader learns how to encourage those who have differing convictions. Emotional intelligence assists the leader in building and nurturing relationships. Leadership is about people. Learning how to understand and work effectively with emotions is a large success factor. Effective leaders recognize personal strengths and weaknesses, see the links between feelings and behaviors, are aware of emotional cues, challenge bias and intolerance, and are able to handle a multitude of tense situations effectively. They learn how to manage these emotions within themselves and others. This, in turn, allows energy to be channeled into productivity. Always remember, there is a balance that needs to be struck with these competencies. Too much could yield unwanted results just as too little. Balanced Leadership Review each difference to learn more. Too Much State Balanced Competencies Too Little State Overuse can lead to viewing own beliefs as the only correct ones or not considering other’s perspectives. Additionally, leaders could see themselves to be right based on the title. On a moral level, overuse of conviction could come across as a sermon as opposed to a point of view. Leading with Conviction Uncertainty about one’s own beliefs leads to the organization frequently switching directions and convictions being sacrificed. Ignoring or not cultivating convictions leads to transactional relationships with staff and disconnMHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations Week 1 Discussion and Project instructions · Week 1 Discussion Instructions Discussion Topic Top of Form Due March 25 at 11:59 PM Bottom of Form Supporting Lecture: Review the following lecture: · Developing and Communicating a Compelling Vision Discussion Questions Before beginning work on this discussion forum, please review the link “ Doing Discussion Questions Right ,” the expanded grading rubric for the forum below, and any specific instructions for this topic. Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit your responses in the Discussion Area. Introduction Highly effective leaders need to be able to develop and communicate their vision to their followers. This discussion is designed to help you develop your visionary skills. Tasks Formulate a vision for your organization and communicate it to your classmates. If you are currently not working in a healthcare organization, formulate this vision for your organization. If you are not working, use this discussion to communicate your personal vision. In doing so, be sure to include: · The organization’s or your mission · Your vision for the organization or for yourself · Your vision of where the organization or you will be not only in reference to healthcare but also in other industries To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the  South University Online Library . As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Your initial posting should be addressed at 500–1000 words as noted in the attached PDF. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format. Respond to your classmates throughout the week. Justify your answers with examples, research, and reasoning. Follow-up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week. · Week 1 Project Instructions Assignment Top of Form  Due March 29 at 11:59 PM Bottom of Form Supporting Lecture: Review the following lecture: · Earning Trust Project The project assignment provides a forum for analyzing and evaluating relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered. Introduction Building trust is one of the most important aspects of leadership. As a leader, you will need to have an executable plan to develop trust. As you continue on your leadership path, the plan will become more ingrained and even take some adjustment, but you must begin somewhere. Tasks Read the following article: · Reagan, B. (2004). How to score high on the trust equation. National Underwriter/P&C, 108(19), 10–11. Using this article as a foun3/23/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=371630&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=6574&d2l_b… 1/3 Response No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points Satisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 points Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points Exemplary (A: 36-40) 40 points Criterion Score Quality of Initial Posting / 40No initial posting exists to evaluate. The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation. The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment. The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed. The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in- depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings. Participation No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points Criterion Score Participation in Discussion / 20No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum. May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other students post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or “I agree. *Comments are off topic. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful conversation and may include a follow-up question. Writing No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-13) Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points 3/23/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377968&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226979&… 1/2 Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points Exemplary (A Range) (14–15) 15 points Criterion Score Includes all assignment components and meets graduate level critical thinking. A purpose statement is identified for the response. / 15Student did not submit assignment. Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points Exemplary (A Range) (14–15) 15 points Criterion Score Integrates and understands assignments concepts and topics. / 15Student did not submit assignment. Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (1–10) 10 points Satisfactory (C Range) 11 points Proficient (B Range) (12–13) 13 points Exemplary (A Range) (14– 15) 15 points Criterion Score Synthesizes, analyses, and evaluates / 15Student did not submit assignment. Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from 3/23/2021 Rubric Assessment - MHA6100-Executive Leadership in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=75828&evalObjectId=377968&evalObjectType=1&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=226979&… 2/2 Total / 50 Overall Score Close resources to apply concepts in the assignment. concepts and strategies. but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses one credible resource in the assignment. gleaned from sources to support ma