Fluent Essays

You have been given the opportunity to present your case to an influential interest group in your community. You will use information gathered in each of the previous assignments to create a compelling presentation with the goal of persuading the interest group that your position on the policy is worthy of being implemented. Create a 6–8-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you: Provide a historical perspective of the policy from the Week 3 assignment, Historical Perspective. Describe the official and unofficial actors of the policy from the Week 6 assignment, Analyzing Policy. Present both of the positions of the policy from the Week 8 assignment, Position Paper. Persuade the audience that the position you have chosen is worthy of the policy being implemented. Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than five years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than “.gov” do not qualify as peer-reviewed.  Your assignment must include: Title slide with the name of the policy, your name, and date. Reference slide with at least four peer-reviewed references formatted according to the Strayer Writing Standards. 6–8 slides (the title slide and reference slide are not included in this number). A typed narration of each of your slides in the Notes section of the PowerPoint presentation. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is: Defend positions (for and against) on policy issues using various argument types.Running Head: THE US FOREIGN POLICY UNDER BUSH’S ADMINISTRATION 1 THE US FOREIGN POLICY UNDER BUSH’S ADMINISTRATION 7 The US Foreign Policy under Bush’s Administration Kendall Brooks Strayer University Intro to Public Policy Analysis March 1, 2021 The US Foreign Policy under Bush’s Administration The United States of America has witnessed the most crucial time of history since 2001 since it has been engaged with war on terror. In such a critical phase, the US was ruled by two Presidents: George W. Bush and George H.W Bush. Each one had his different views concerning the foreign policy of the country. The US foreign policy is formulated based on its relationship with the foreign nations, and the way it sets its relations with international organizations. This report will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the foreign policy of the US under the Bush administration. There is a school of thought that views President George W. Bush to be successful in the context of the war on terror. President George W. Bush has ruled the country during the most critical time of history of the USA. Bush administration had taken certain policy measures that ensured the US hegemony of the globe. That is, President Bush, defined the world order to be uni-polar in the Bush Doctrine. This can be attributed to the great success of the US foreign policy that it has attained the position of the sole superpower of the world, and since then the US foreign policy is formulated accordingly so that it could maintain its hegemony over the world. One can say that in the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers in the US, the US has launched the global war on terror by violating the United Nations Security Council resolution. That is the US did not even comply with international norms and laws provided under the UN Charter. Consequently, the Security Council had to pass the UNSC resolution 1373 against terrorism in 2001 (United Nations Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee, 2021). It implies that the US exercises its influence not only on sovereign nations but also on international political organizations. Another aspect that shows the success of the foreign policy of the US under the Bush administration is that it had waged a war against Iraq in 2003 in an attempt to promote democracy. The point is it is in the core interests of the US foreign policy to promote liberal values of democracy all across the world (Cox, 2018). The basic objective of the Bush Doctrine was to identify the connection between democracy, liberalism, and security to influence the defense and foreign policy of the US. And this was successfully attained under the Bush administration. There is another school of thought that believes the foreign policy of the US has been proving to have flaws because the time has changed now, while the foreign policy has not been involved from conservative approach. The point is till the time, the US economy was not FOREIGN POLICY 6 Foreign Policy of USA Under George H.W. Bush and Georg W. Bush By Kendall Brooks Intro to Public Policy Analysis Dr. Timothy Smith Strayer University January 25, 2021 Foreign Policy of USA under George H.W. Bush and Georg W. Bush George H.W Bush and George W. Bush are two former presidents of the United States of America who ruled the country in a critical phase of history. George H.W Bush assumed power when the cold war was in its last breath. The period was significant for America and had a profound impact on the entire world simply because the end of the cold war led to the emergence of new world order. In this juncture of history, George H. W. Bushs foreign policy has been remarkable, particularly for international law supremacy. Senior Bushs political insight and ability to understand the foreign policy and complexities of the situation were fair enough to shift the world from the cold war to the new world order. During his entire time, he focused on international laws, took consultative policies, accepted multilateralism, and avoid unilateral decisions. Unlike his father, George W. Bush pursued his foreign policy in different ways. George W. Bushs foreign policy mostly revolved around his nationalism and his unilateralism. Disregard his allies and world views. Junior Bush framed policies in foreign affairs that impacted Americas social and economic matters but have a profound and disastrous impact on some parts of the world. His approach to the war on terror persists even after two decades of its initiation, putting an adverse effect on America and the regional economy. Moreover, his unilateral foreign policy maligned Americas position on Human Rights, international laws, and globalization. The following are the details of senior and junior Bushs foreign policy of the United States of America (Reilly 2006).  Foreign Policy of George H. W. Bush As the 41st president of the United States of America, George H. W. Bush came into power in 1989. It was a time when the Soviet Union was disintegrated after four and half decades of ideological and economic war with the United States of America. In this critical juncture of history, it was imperative to have a statesman who led America and give direction to the rest of the world. Being a sole superpower, it was indispensable for the United States of America to lead the world. Keeping the view of this importance, George H. W Bush gave a new guideline to the world what we called The New World Order. The new world order was a guideline that how the international system should run. Previously there were two aggressive approaches: Soviet-led communism and USA lead capitalism. The Soviet Unions disintegration provided an open field for America to implement its agendas that had long been struggled for them. The situation in the Middle East was also difRunning Head: FOREIGN POLICY 1 FOREIGN POLICY 7 Foreign Policy Kendall Brooks PAD510: Introduction to Public Policy Analysis Strayer University February 15, 2021 Introduction The two ex-presidents of the U.S., George W. Bush, and George H.W Bush ruled the country in a critical phase of history. Both had different views on US foreign policy. The USs foreign policy consists of its relationship with foreign nations and the way it sets US residents associations, companies, and applications collaborative norms the way it sets US residents associations, companies, and applications collaborative norms. In this report, the light will be shed on the motives, conflicts, interrelationships, and impacts on the policy by the two presidents.  Summary From the period of 2001 to 2009, the President of the state, George W. Bush, served the nation. During his time several policies were reformed for the betterment of the country. State Secretaries, National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, Condoleezza Rice, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Colin Powell, were among the principal policy advisors during the president bush era (Issues in Foreign Policy, 2021). For nearly half a century, the major objective of American foreign affairs is to fight the Soviet threat. While the foreign policy agenda still includes national security questions and relations with Russia, new issues are at the forefront. The increasing interdependencies between domestic and foreign policies are blurring in economic development, communications, and the environment. However, the terrorist outbreak on September 11 in 2001, steered president bush to reframe the foreign policy of the US as a War on Terror, along with two other wars in the Middle East. On September 11, the Pentagon of Washington, DC and the New York City World Trade Center were hijacked and crashed by 19 al-Qaeda associated terrorists. Soon after the attack, the Bush administration launched a global war on terror. Afghanistan was the primary front during this attack. Furthermore, the United States of America went to war with Iraq in 2003 (Sotirović, 2019). While American forces quickly drove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein out (and eventually killed him), the conflict has lasted for years. In the US and around the world, intelligence agencies believed that before the war began, Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, but they did not find such weapons during and after the war. On September 14 2001, the Agreement for the Use of the Army against Terrorism (AUMF) was introduced. The strategy enabled the US Armed Forces to use the forces accountable for the September 11 attacks. The President allowed the use of any legitimate and sufficient force by means of this Act. By preventing terrorism, the powers will guarantee the stability of America. Organizations or individuals who, against them, are deemed to be intended, permitted, or supported in the event of terrorist outbreaks that took place on September 11 2001,