Fluent Essays

For this Assignment, review the Learning Resources for this week. You submit your selected models of addiction, treatment, and case management for your Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP). In addition, you provide a rationale for selecting these models and explain their strengths and limitations. Refer to the Instructions for Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP) Case Study document in Week 1. In a 4­–5 page APA-formatted paper: Submit the models of addiction, treatment, and case management you selected for your Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP) Case Study. Include the following information: Your chosen model of addiction and the rationale for your selection Potential strengths and limitations of this model of addiction Your chosen model of treatment and the rationale for your selection Potential strengths and limitations of this model of treatment Your chosen model of case management and the rationale for your selection Potential strengths and limitations of this model of case management  I have attached the required reading documents.  These are also required readings below    Doweiko, H. E. (2019). Concepts of chemical dependency (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage. Chapter 28, “The Assessment of Suspected Substance Use Disorders” (pp. 389-404) Chapter 31, “The Treatment of Substance Use Disorders” (pp. 424-436) Jung, J. (2010). Alcohol, other drugs, and behavior: Psychological research perspectives (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Chapter 3, “Alcohol and Other Drugs: Use, Abuse, and Dependence” (pp. 57–79) Chapter 14, “Treatment of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependencies” (pp. 377–394, stop before Evaluation of Treatment Programs)Instructions for Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP) Case Study 1. For your SPP, you will prepare a case study of Marge, the client presented in the media throughout the course. 2. Your case study will consist of two sections: A narrative case study section and a treatment plan section. 3. The narrative case study section will be written using the required APA style. You will use this document as a guide for the narrative section of your case study and include at a minimum the 18 elements presented below. The final narrative case study section should be approximately 15–20 pages in length. 4. Your treatment plan section will follow the Treatment Plan Template introduced in your Assignment for Week 5. 5. The timeline for your case study will extend from the client’s admission into residential treatment (Counseling Session 1), proceed through her course of treatment there (Counseling Sessions 2 and 3), and conclude with a discharge plan of her projected long-term treatment extending through the next 12 months. Case Study Format Treatment Plan Section · Treatment plan developed using Treatment Plan Template and attached at end of case study. Narrative Case Study Section IDENTIFYING INFORMATION · Name, age, race/ethnicity, gender, marital status, and any other appropriate information PRESENTING PROBLEM · Brief summary of the problem(s) and concerns that brought the client to treatment · Description of current condition including physical and mental status and attitude on admission · Who accompanies client and provides collateral information · Other relevant information ASSESSMENT · Description of how initial screening was conducted to validate the existence of a problem and make initial treatment recommendations. Include how information was gathered (e.g., verbal clinical interview, paper-and-pencil assessment instrument) and sources of information (e.g., client, family members). · Overview of ongoing assessment process to evaluate severity of the addiction, rule out the co-existence of other relevant problems, assist in treatment planning, and monitor progress (e.g., continued more detailed interviews with client and family members, observation, standardized assessment instruments). ADDICTION HISTORY · Substance(s) used and/or any addictive behaviors identified · Age of first use · Family history of addiction (chemical and/or behavioral) · Progression of use to current stage · Average frequency and amount over last six months · Other signs and symptoms of addictive use (e.g., blackouts, increased tolerance over time, physical withdrawals if use stopped) · Negative consequences experienced due to use · Previous attempts to stop on own and/or treatment history · Level of denial of problem (e.g., none, mild, moderate, severe) · Level of motivation to change on admission (low, moderate, high) CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS · Any other current or past mental disorder or mental health problem · Signs, symptoms, course of disorder, 2 Treatnet: International Network of Drug Dependence Treatment and Rehabilitation Resource Centres. Good practice document Sustained Recovery Management Good Practice www.unodc.org/treatnet Vienna, September 2008 3 Disclaimer The views expressed in this good practice document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNODC. A reference to a document or a website does not imply endorsement by UNODC of the accuracy of the information contained therein. This document has not been formally edited yet. This good practice document has been prepared by a professionally and geographically diverse working group with participants from five drug dependence treatment centres as part of UNODC project GLO/H43 “Treatnet – International Network of Drug Dependence Treatment and Rehabilitation Resource Centres”. It was peer reviewed to assure comprehensiveness and its relevance to different sociocultural environments as well as a balanced representation of different perspectives on the issue. 4 Acknowledgements The present publication is one of a series of four documents developed under UNODC project GLOH43: Treatnet-International network of drug dependence treatment and rehabilitation resource centres. It responds to UNODC’s mandate, to develop and disseminate good practice in the field of drug dependence treatment. During Phase I an international network of drug dependence treatment and rehabilitation resource centres in all regions was initiated, with a view to facilitating dissemination of knowledge and good practices. This document has been produced by members of one of four working group consisting of representatives from Treatnet members and the topics of the documents include: • Community Based Treatment • Interventions for Drug Users in Prisons • The Role of Drug Dependence Treatment on the Prevention and Care of HIV and AIDS • Sustained Recovery Management. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime expresses its gratitude to the following: • The donors of project GLO/H43: The Governments of Canada, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, The United States of America and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for their generous contribution. • All Treatnet Resource Centres (in alphabetical order by country) participating in the working group on Sustained Recovery Management and the respective Treatnet Focal Points for their professionalism, commitment, enthusiasm and the mutual support given to each other as well as the financial and time resources dedicated to the network: • Mario Alberto Zapata on behalf of CARISMA- Centre for Attention and Integral Rehabilitation of Mental Health, Medellin (Colombia) • Max Hopperdietzel on behalf of Mudra, Nürnberg (Germany) • Shanti Ranganathan on behalf of TT Ranganathan Clinical Research Foundation, Chennai (India) • Akinwande AkinhanEffectiveness of Different Models of Case Management for Substance-Abusing Populations Wouter Vanderplasschen, Ph.D.*; Judith Wolf, Ph.D.**; Richard C. Rapp, M.S.W.*** & Eric Broekaert, Ph.D.**** Abstract—Case management has been implemented in substance abuse treatment to improve (cost-) efTectiveness, but controversy exists about its potential to realize this objective. A systematic and comprehensive review of peer-reviewed articles (n = 48) published between 1993 and 2003 is presented, focusing on the effects of different models of case management among various substance-abusing populations. Results show that several studies have reported positive effects, but only some randomized and controlled trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of case management compared with other interventions. Lx>ngitudinal effects of this intervention remain unclear. Although no compelling evidence was found for the effectiveness of case management, some evidence is available about the (differential) effectiveness of intensive case management and assertive community treatment for homeless and dually-diagnosed substance abusers. Strengths-based and generalist case management have proven to be relatively effective for substance abusers in general. Most positive effects concern reduced use of inpatient services and increased utilization of community-based services, prolonged treatment retention, improved quality of life, and high client satisfaction. Outcomes concerning drug use and psychosocial functioning are less consistent, but seem to be mediated by retention in treatment and case management. Further research is required to leam more about the extent of the effects of this intervention, how long these are sustained and what specific elements cause particular outcomes. Keywords—case management, effectiveness, review, substance abuse, treatment Despite several reports of positive outcomes (Sindelar et al. 2004; Gossop et al. 2003; Simpson et al. 1999), some observations raise questions concerning the effectiveness Research and Teaching Assistant, Ghent University, Department of Orthopedagogics, Gent, Belgium. ••Senior Researcher, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS Utrecht, the Netherlands; Professor in Public Mental Health, University Medical Center St-Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. •••Assistant Professor, Wright State University, School of Medicine, Center for Interventions, Treatment and Addictions Research (CITAR), Dayton, Ohio, United States. ••••Professor in Orthopedagogy, Ghent University, Department of Orthopedagogics, Gent, Belgium. Please address correspondence and reprint requests to Wouter Vanderplasschen, Ghent University, Department of Orthopedagogics, H. DunanUaan 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. Tel. 32-9-264 63 64, Fax. 32-9-264 64 91: Email: [email protected] Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 81 of substance abuse treatment, such as the limited acces- sibility of treatment agencies (Brindis & Theidon 1997), relatively high dropout and I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L O F SOCIAL WELFARE ISSN 1369-6866 © 2008 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare. 270 Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00608.x Int J Soc Welfare 2009: 18 : 270–280 Kolind T, Vanderplasschen W, De Maeyer J. Dilemmas when working with substance abusers with multiple and complex problems: the case manager’s perspective Int J Soc Welfare 2009: 18: 270–280 © 2008 The Author(s), Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare. Since the 1990s, case management has been implemented in the USA and Canada – and recently also in various European countries – to support substance abusers with multiple and complex needs. Although this intervention is often presented as a set of standardised functions, its application is often a subjective task involving various dilemmas, which may influence case management outcomes significantly. Based on a comparison of case managers’ experiences in Denmark and Belgium, we focus on several core dilemmas in case management for substance abusers with complex problems. Case management practices vary from one project to the next and even within the same project. Such differences are apparently related to the way in which case managers approach dilemmas such as those existing between control versus self-determination, or between systematic versus ad- hoc planning. The conclusion is that it is vital to discuss these dilemmas during training courses and supervision meetings in order to ensure that the intended form of intervention is actually delivered on the ground. Torsten Kolind 1 , Wouter Vanderplasschen 2 , Jessica De Maeyer 2 1 Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus, Denmark 2 Department of Orthopedagogics, Ghent University, Belgium Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKIJSWInternational Journal of Social Welfare1369-68661468-2397© 2008 The Author(s), Journal compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the International Journal of Social WelfareXXX Original Articles The case manager’s perspectiveKolind et al. Dilemmas when working with substance abusers with multiple and complex problems: the case manager’s perspective Key words: case management, substance abuse, substance abuse treatment, coordination, Denmark, Belgium, qualitative research Torsten Kolind, Nobelparken bygn. 1543, Center for Rusmiddel- forskning, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 3, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] Accepted for publication June 17, 2008 Introduction Since the 1970s, case management has been introduced in various countries to improve the accessibility, accountability, coordination and continuity of services provided to diverse at-risk populations with multi-fa