Fluent Essays

I have attached the templet for Chapter 5.  I have also attached my Proposal Dissertation so that youll know what my paper consist of. You have any questions, just let me know.  Thank YouChapter 5 - Discussion Although the entire dissertation represents an opportunity for you to demonstrate your doctoral level ability to design and conduct meaningful research, the discussion chapter often represents a particular opportunity to distinguish one’s research competency. Consider the flow of the dissertation and how each chapter fits together. Chapter one represents an introduction to the study, but also contains succinct sections summarizing key information from every section of the dissertation. A well-done chapter one may be nearly ready for submission to a journal for publication. Chapter two engages the existing literature to draw out a topic and a question for your research. In other words, it moves from the broad (discipline literature) to the specific (your study). Chapter three discusses how you are going to conduct your specific research. Chapter four reports the findings of your study. Accordingly, chapter five is your opportunity to take what you’ve learned from your specific study and integrate it back into the larger body of discipline. How do your findings point out consistencies or inconsistencies with other studies (e.g., literature review)? How do you interpret the meaning of the results? How do your findings inform, extend, or even challenge existing theories or ideas? These questions are not meant to be an outline per se, but idea starters about the types of things you should address. Similar to previous sections of your dissertation, you should organize your discussion chapter using headings and subheadings. Be rigorous and vigorous in how you connect your findings to the literature. Chapter five is an opportunity for you to “flex your muscles” and show your mastery of the discipline in the application of your research findings. However, be sure to acknowledge any risks, limitations, biases, or weaknesses in the findings or the interpretation. Recommendations As a part of the scholarly and professional community, you need to answer the “so what” question. For example, are their recommendations for practitioners or practicing professionals that emerge from your work? What should leaders or organizations do differently? Also, provide your recommendations for future research. What should researchers consider next? Where does your study take the field? What gaps are still evident? What questions are still unanswered? Summary of the Study As the final segment of your study, provide a brief (1 -2 page) capstone. Synthesize the study down to its most essential parts. What did you do? Why? What did you find? Did you answer your question? Why does it matter? ReferenceRunning Head: THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL 58 The Role of Strategic Management and Leadership Traits on Employee Performance, Motivation, and Job Satisfaction: Chapters 1 – 3 of the Dissertation Submitted to South University College of Business In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Ameki Williams South University BUS8105E_A-Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Dr. Matthew Kuofie 06/15/2022 Abstract The research study will focus on the role of strategic management traits on employee performance, motivation, and job satisfaction. A literature review shows that strategic management style affects employees performance, determination, and job satisfaction. Pioneer scholars have extensively researched strategic management styles though there is limited literature on the impacts of management traits. The purpose of the study is to illustrate the need for new management approaches in organizational management by comparing the varying effects of management and leadership traits on performance, motivation, and job satisfaction. The existing management styles have weaknesses necessitating the need for more advanced approaches that can address these limitations. The study looks at different management traits to blend them to meet employees needs and organizations objectives. The researchers will use a situational strategic management theoretical framework to venture into the study. The framework recognizes the need for leadership adaptability based on situations. Stakeholders will use the findings to strengthen organizational management. In this study, researchers are using management, as well as leadership in other areas. Table of Contents Abstract 2 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 5 Purpose of the Study 6 Statement of the Problem 6 Theoretical Framework 7 Definitions 7 Research Questions and Hypotheses 8 Scope of the Study 11 Delimitations: 11 Limitations: 11 Assumptions, Risks and Biases 12 Significance of the Study 13 Summary 13 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 15 Definition of Strategic Management 16 The strategy statements 17 Importance of vision and mission statements 17 Conceptual Framework 18 Strategic Decisions in Strategic Management 26 Characteristics and Features of Strategic Decisions in Strategic Management 27 Business Policy 29 Features of a Good Business Policy 29 Importance of Business Policies 30 SWOT Analysis 31 Factors of the SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) 31 Advantages of SWOT Analysis 33 Limitations of SWOT Analysis 35 Competitor Analysis 36 Reasons for Doing a Competitor Analysis 36 Strategic Leadership 37 Summary 38 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 40 Research Method 40 Research Design 41 Participants 42 Instrumentation 43 Structured Interviews 45 Research Procedure 45 Data Analysis 46 Protection of Human Rights 47 Delimitations and Limitations 47 Assumptions, Risks and Biases 48 Significance of t