Fluent Essays

ATTACHED Research the various change models used by organizations today. After assessing these models, create a change model conducive to your field (NURSING), and that will work within your organization's culture (PRIME HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION). This model should serve to implement a strategic process that can help your organization integrate a change and respond to the internal or external driving forces that affect organizational success. Create a visual representation of your model using a graphic organizer of your choice (flow chart, concept map, etc.). The design of your model will be unique and relevant to your organization, based on a critical analysis of its culture and behavior. However, your model must demonstrate the necessary steps for realistic implementation. Your model will be assessed on the quality of strategic implementation you design, the support you present for your model, and inclusion of the following concepts: 1. Methods to evaluate the need for change 2. Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative 3. Communication strategies 4. Strategies to gather stakeholder support and overcome resistance 5. Implementation strategies 6. Sustainability strategies Once you have created your model, prepare a 15-20 slide PowerPoint presentation to present your model and demonstrate how this model is relevant to your organization and why it will work well within your organization's culture. In conclusion, discuss why this model will lead to sustainable change when most change initiatives fail. You will utilize this change model for your final paper. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style 7TH EDITION. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric and FOLLOW IT. Will be submitted to turnitin Evaluate the Need for Change  11 points Criteria Description Evaluate the Need for Change  5. Excellent 11 points Methods used to evaluate the need for change are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and numerous supporting details. 4. Good 9.57 points Methods used to evaluate the need for change are complete and include explanation and supporting details. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Methods used to evaluate the need for change are included but lack explanation and supporting details. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Methods used to evaluate the need for change are incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Methods used to evaluate the need for change are not included. Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative (B) 11 points Criteria Description Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative Analyze organizational behavior to determine systemic interdependencies among individuals, teams, and departments. (C 3.1, 6.1) 5. Excellent 11 points Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are expertly crafted. 4. Good 9.57 points Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are complete and clearly explained. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are included but lack clear explanation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are incomplete or incorrect.  1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are not included. Communication Strategies 11 points Criteria Description Communication Strategies 5. Excellent 11 points Communication strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior. 4. Good 9.57 points Communication strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Communication strategies are included but are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Communication strategies are incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Communication strategies are not included. Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance 11 points Criteria Description Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance 5. Excellent 11 points Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are expertly crafted. 4. Good 9.57 points Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are complete and clearly explained. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are included but lack clear explanation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are not included. Implementation Strategies 11 points Criteria Description Implementation Strategies 5. Excellent 11 points Implementation strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior. 4. Good 9.57 points Implementation strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Implementation strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Implementation strategies are incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Implementation strategies are not included. Sustainability Strategies 11 points Criteria Description Sustainability Strategies 5. Excellent 11 points Sustainability strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior. 4. Good 9.57 points Sustainability strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Sustainability strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Sustainability strategies are incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sustainability strategies are not included. Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model 5.5 points Criteria Description Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model 5. Excellent 5.5 points The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that clearly illustrates the change model. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. 4. Good 4.79 points The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that illustrates the change model. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships of the change model. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. 3. Satisfactory 4.35 points The change model is presented using a graphic organizer, but the design does not clearly illustrate the intended change model. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout of the graphic design used.  2. Less than Satisfactory 4.07 points The change model is presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of change model uses garish color or the typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited within the chosen design. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The change model is not presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of Content on PowerPoint 11 points Criteria Description Presentation of Content on PowerPoint 5. Excellent 11 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating rationale and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Good 9.57 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. PowerPoint Layout 5.5 points Criteria Description PowerPoint Layout 5. Excellent 5.5 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. 4. Good 4.79 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. 3. Satisfactory 4.35 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.  2. Less than Satisfactory 4.07 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Research  11 points Criteria Description Research  5. Excellent 11 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Strong support and rationale is presented for the change model. 4. Good 9.57 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Adequate support and rationale is presented for the change model. 3. Satisfactory 8.69 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. General support and rationale is presented for the change model. 2. Less than Satisfactory 8.14 points Few outside sources were used to support the change model. Limited research is apparent to provide support or rationale for the change model. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No outside sources were used to support the change model. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.5 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5. Excellent 5.5 points The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. Good 4.79 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 3. Satisfactory 4.35 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 2. Less than Satisfactory 4.07 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Documentation of Sources  5.5 points Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Excellent 5.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. Good 4.79 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.  3. Satisfactory 4.35 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. Less than Satisfactory 4.07 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Total 110 points 7 Prime Healthcare Organization Student’s Name(s) Institutional Affiliation(s) Course Details Instructor’s Name(s) Date Prime Healthcare Organization Organizational Culture Prime Healthcare Organization has a decentralized and hierarchy-based organizational and leadership structure, working in the best means to motivate subordinates and enhance growth and diversification. Real et al. (2017) confirm that decentralization in healthcare organizations improves communication for quality care and innovations. These elements change management by enhancing agility and response to a new standard. Besides, the organization's mission is to save and promote hospitals to strengthen the compassion, quality, and better care to patients and communities. It is client-focused, where the organization targets the primary consumers of its services while focusing on the community as a whole. By being customer-based, the organization stands a chance to support change by enhancing convenience, quality, access, and response, while abolishing the boundaries. Madhani (2018) notes that by being customer-centric, the organization gains competitiveness by increasing customer engagement to promote collaboration. Prime Healthcare Organization values include quality, compassion, community, and being physician-led by being committed to performance and exceptional care, providing dignity, serving and giving back to the community, and allowing direct health care at all levels by the doctors and clinicians. This element entails interprofessional collaboration in delivering care at diverse levels. The employees perceive the organization as decentralized, considering their active participation in the organization in all operations. Capacity Assessment Framework- Assessing Readiness for Change A Capacity Assessment Framework is designed by the UNDP to evaluate the organizational readiness to promote global health intervention (Dearing, 2018). Dearing notes that assessing organizational readiness entails measuring motivation and the capacity for those firms or service providers to participate in initiatives. A capacity assessment framework is a tool for addressing the organization's readiness to intervention or change, which entails identifying significant capacities that exist and the additional ones required to attain the objectives. Therefore, this tool is a salient element for analyzing desire or needed capacities against the already existing ones for enhancing planning and response. Based on this tool, capacity assessment framework, the Prime Healthcare Organization has exemplary capabilities in organizational attributes, defining the superb organizational culture through explicit mission and purpose, and recognizing the organizational values. The capacity assessment framework analyzes the capabilities of the people, processes, technological resources, physical resources, and organizational systems as a perfect tool for assessing readiness for change. Diab et al. (2018) confirm that change readiness assessment examines the readiness of attitudes, resources, and conditions for capacity development initiatives. Prime Healthcare Organization is adequately ready for change considering its strengths in retaining the best skills, salient communication capabilities, decentralized governance, adequate technology, availability of the human, physical and financial resources, and strong stakeholder partnerships. It is customer-focused, offering an opportunity to integrate changing customer needs. However, frequent changes in the technology required are a threat to the organization, requiring vast investment and commitment. The readiness for change in this organization is high because of the strong team engagement or commitment to change and the collective capability to integrate change. Team spirit, information flow, and mutual support are palpable elements supporting the organization's readiness to change. Health Care Process and Systems Needing Improved Quality, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Prime Healthcare Organization being a physician-led service provider, the doctors offer direct care, requiring interventions for feasible clinical interventions. The physician-led system requires an improvement in handling patients, managing the costs, and delivering quality-led care. As a result, it is imperative to initiate Quality improvement collaboratives (CICs) by using standardized methodologies and designations for collecting high-quality data (Luckenbaugh et al., 2017). Additionally, after the collection, the data analysis is conducted to offer feedback to the physicians, initiate collaboration techniques and procedures, and distribute the results to the entire team to disseminate coordinated care at the population level. De la Perrelle et al. (2020) confirm that integrating QICs at scale is imperative for consistent cost identification to form cost-saving healthcare systems in both acute and chronic illnesses. Strategies to Enhance Organizational Readiness A salient strategy identified for enhancing the organizational readiness in Prime Healthcare Organization and applicable to similar organizations is the Transtheoretical Model (TTM). Vax et al. (2021) confirm that TTM prepares the organization for change by aligning with a tailored approach to meet organizational needs. The primary stage of the TTM is pre-contemplation, where people have no idea regarding the need for change and the second phase is where the organization acknowledges the benefits of changes, although costs and risk outmatch the paybacks. Thus, at the third preparation and fourth action phases for the organizational readiness, the organization is bound to initiate training for upskilling and motivation, changing policy such as focusing on solution-focused approaches for adaptability, and encouraging the integration of technology in the healthcare practices (Vax et al., 2021). Besides, considering the integration of big data analytics is a salient approach for enhancing organizational readiness by improving intelligence and research-based intervention. Stakeholders and Team Members in the Project The identified stakeholders and teams in the evidence-based project for increasing patient satisfaction and raising the revenue collection while decreasing the LWBT rate include the ER nurses, informaticians, and the ACOs. The ER nurses will respond quickly to crises and identify real-time stabilization strategies for pain management and patient satisfaction. The informaticians will be responsible for comparing real-time location systems against the manual status updates for tracking patients to establish outcomes for each while focusing on data and big data for quality service delivery and technology integration. The ACOs will be responsible for coordinated care where reimbursements will be attached to quality measures, basing intervention on value. Information and Communication Technologies Electronic Health Records (EHR) are the primary requirement to enhance data collection and retrieval in real-time. Besides, the clinical decision support system (CDS) is essential as the primary tool for mitigating errors by guiding healthcare practitioners at the emergence department solution-focused approaches. Alotaibi and Federico (2017) acknowledge that CDS is a guiding tool to the correct procedures to attain desired outcomes. Through these technologies, practitioners are motivated to pursue outcomes according to the client's needs by enhancing alerts, reminders, and notifications for process adherence. References Alotaibi, Y. K., & Federico, F. (2017). The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631 De la Perrelle, L., Radisic, G., Cations, M., Kaambwa, B., Barbery, G., & Laver, K. (2020). Costs and economic evaluations of quality improvement collaboratives in healthcare: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4981-5 Dearing, J. W. (2018). Organizational readiness tools for global health intervention: A review. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00056 Diab, G. M., Safan, S. M., & Bakeer, H. M. (2018). Organizational change readiness and manager' behavior in managing change. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 8(7), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n7p68 Luckenbaugh, A. N., Miller, D. C., & Ghani, K. R. (2017). Collaborative quality improvement. Current Opinion in Urology, 27(4), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000404 Madhani, P. M. (2018). Building a customer-focused culture in organisations: Developing 7Cs model. International Journal of Business Excellence, 16(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2018.10015931 Real, K., Bardach, S. H., & Bardach, D. R. (2017). The role of the built environment: How decentralized nurse stations shape communication, patient care processes, and patient outcomes. Health Communication, 32(12), 1557-1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1239302 Vax, S., Gidugu, V., Farkas, M., & Drainoni, M. (2021). Ready to roll: Strategies and actions to enhance organizational readiness for implementation in community mental health. Implementation Research and Practice, 2, 263348952098825. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489520988254 Prime Healthcare Organization Our mission and our values guide how we conduct our business, what we believe in and where we are headed. Our Promise To provide compassionate care and clinical excellence to all patients as we create hospitals that improve healthcare in every community we serve. Our Mission To save and improve hospitals so that they can deliver compassionate, quality care to patients and better healthcare for communities. Prime Hospital's Mission To deliver compassionate, quality care to patients and better healthcare to communities. Our Values Quality  We are committed to always providing exceptional care and performance. Compassion  We deliver patient-centered healthcare with compassion, dignity and respect for every patient and family. Community  We are honored to be trusted partners who serve, give back and grow with our communities. Physician-Led  We are a uniquely physician-founded and physician-led organization that allows doctors and clinicians to direct healthcare at every level.