Fluent Essays

Part Two of this project addresses the following course outcomes: ● Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences ● Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world ● Utilize empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues on individuals and society   SEE ATTACHEMENTSSCI 200 Project Part Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview Basic scientific literacy is essential for understanding real-world applications of the natural sciences. As a consumer and voter, you will be faced with issues that require a basic understanding of science. For example, you might ask yourself the following questions: How can genetically modified foods affect my health? Should scientists be held liable for not predicting earthquakes that led to human casualties, as they were in Italy in 2012? Is anthropogenic climate change real? Is fracking a concern where I live? Because of the prevalence of natural science issues such as these, it is important to understand basic natural science concepts and how they impact our daily lives. The project for this course has two parts. In part one, you conducted a research investigation that examined an issue in the natural sciences. You identified appropriate resources for investigating the issue you selected, used these resources to develop a question related to the issue, and applied natural science principles to the issue and question. In addition, you identified an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Part Two, you will develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Part One. In your presentation, you will explain how scientific thinking has impacted you and your audience, supporting your claims with evidence. Part Two of this project addresses the following course outcomes: ● Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences ● Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world ● Utilize empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues on individuals and society Prompt Referring to your research investigation, create a presentation that explains how scientific thinking has impacted you and discusses the impact of your selected issue on your audience. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences? II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. III. Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate? 1 V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other worSCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Jennifer Moore Applied Natural Science SCI-200 Professor James Rogers August 7, 2022 SCI 200 Project Part One: Second Draft Introduction Genetically modified foods (GMOs) are relatively new forms of plant or food propagation in the field of agriculture. As a new science, GMO production is full of conflicting viewpoints regarding its implications to human health. First, it is ideal to understand that GMOs have primarily played a great role in food security. Genetic modification has enhanced the productivity, as well as the ability for these products to survive harsh environmental conditions. GM foods also have a longer shelf-life. Consequently, they have enhanced food sufficiency and curbed malnutrition. However, the world is facing an unprecedented crisis characterized by a surge in lifestyle diseases. Therefore, there are areas that scientists can draw a line on whether the foods are safe for consumption or not. Less data is available to indicate whether or not GMOs have adverse impacts on human health. According to Hilbeck et al., (2015), there is not scientific consensus on the safety of GMOs. On the other hand Bian et al (2021) there is insufficient information linking GMOs to lifestyle diseases. Even though these sources dispute the negative implications of GMO foods, Zhang et al., (2016) posits that GMOs can cause health problems such as allergies and poisoning although the information available is insufficient to point out the negative impacts of GMOs on human health. The specific question to ask is; could these diseases be as a result of the rise in consumption of GMOs? Audience GMO is an issue of concern among different populations including children, teenagers, youths and adults. Professionally, physicians are the primary audience that the study of GMOs and their impacts on human healthy should be directed to. Physicians would be most interested since they handle patients who present different problems in hospital facilities each day. As such, they can observe the different symptoms presented by the patients, as well as check the medical history of their patients, and ask some life style questions so as to piece together the impact of GMOs on human health. Studies indicate that poor product labelling and the lack of sufficient funding has hampered researchers from analyzing the health implications of GMO consumption. Therefore, using this approach where physicians conduct research from the patient log, we are able to save on cost as well acquire more reliable information on the safety of GMOs. Moreover, this message is suitable for physicians because it highlights the background of the problem of study, the challenges of conducting credible scientific, and the importance of involving physicians in this study. Since physicians interact with all manner of patients, and since they are learned people who rely on science in the delivery of their services, it will be very easy for them to un3 Speaking Notes Draft Jennifer Moore Southern New Hampshire University Applied Natural Science August 14, 2022 My Topic’s Scientific Background Living things that have had their genetic makeup altered intentionally in a lab setting are referred to as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This involves altering the biological constitution of living things by influencing them. Impact on My Audience Genetically engineered foods have an influence on people all around the world. GMOs are food products created using genetic engineering methods. Because they are simpler and more economical for farmers to produce, GMO components make up the majority of the items at your neighborhood grocery, which makes them more affordable for consumers. My Empirical Evidence Corn, soybeans, canola, sugar beet, alfalfa, cotton, potatoes, papaya, summer squash, and a few apple cultivars are among the foods cultivated utilizing GMO methods in the United States. Foods that contain GMOs are not yet required to be labeled in the United States. However, beginning in 2022, all goods that contain GMO ingredients must have the word bioengineered food or a scannable code to indicate this on the container. Why this issue is important to me personally: Since GMOs influence my family and I, I was among many who knew little about them and was interested in learning more. Impact on my thinking: I didnt initially take a strong position on whether or not GMOs were beneficial or evil. The more study I conduct, the more clearly I can understand how large food operations are possible. Foods and plants that have undergone genetic modification are all around us. Fish, poultry, and veggies. We, the local consumers, who buy locally, are impacted by this unless you are a farmer or grow your own food. I wholeheartedly concur that these foods labels are crucial. At the very least, telling the buyer how the product was made.