Fluent Essays

Students are required to produce a reflective report (LO2/8) on varied leadership approaches taken by different leaders in managing the changes arising from a  contemporary issue (i.e. COVID 19).   Kindly find the detail as attached below. Kindly know that the plagiarism rule applies, please. ASSESSMENT BRIEF AND MARKING RUBRIC Module title: Managing Financial and Human Resources for Sustainable Business Success (HR7003) Assessment point: Assessment point 1 (Week 6) Assessment task: Individual Coursework/Report - HR Word count limit: 3000 words +/- 10% (excluding references and appendices) Width: 50% of overall module grade Procedure in the event of illness or other valid cause (extenuating circumstances) If you believe that: • your performance in assessment or reassessment has been impaired, or; • you were unable to attend for an assessment or reassessment, or; • you were unable to submit assessed or reassessed work by the scheduled date due to illness or other valid cause (as defined in the Procedures Governing Extenuating Circumstances), may submit an application for extenuation for the relevant component(s) to Unicaf Extenuating Circumstances team ([email protected]). *Once a component has been capped, extenuation does not uncap it. Academic misconduct including plagiarism Ensure that you are familiar with the relevant regulations regarding academic misconduct. By submitting the assignment, you declare that it is your own work and that the material and sources of information used, including internet sources, have been fully identified and properly acknowledged. In addition, you confirm that the presented work has not been submitted for any other assessment. You also acknowledge that the faculty reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct which, if proven and dependent on the severity level of the offence, may result in a penalty that could affect your progress. By submitting your work, you acknowledge that you have read and agreed with the above statements. General Guidance Your assignment should be MS Word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted), using Times New Roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page. Note this is a report supported by academic research so you should adhere to the appropriate referencing guidance. The word limit stated for this assignment excludes the list of references at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and graphs). Please be aware that exceeding the word limit will affect the academic judgement of the piece of work and may result in the award of a lower mark. Appendices are not considered a supplement and will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded; however, it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in the word count. The majority of references should come from secondary sources (e.g. journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise area-specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use the Harvard style of referencing. Please indicate the word count length at the end of your assignment. Marking and assessment This assignment will be marked out of 100% and contributes to 50% of the total module mark. The pass mark is 50%. Nevertheless, in order to pass this module, you must both achieve an aggregate mark of 50% and also meet the assignment threshold marks. For the purposes of passing a module, each assignment has a threshold mark of 40%. The marking rubric is attached, which offers guidance on the assessment criteria and weighting. Late Submission There will be a stipulated deadline date for all assignments. All assignments will need to be submitted by the set time on the stipulated deadline date. Assignments submitted up to 24 hours late will be accepted, but the assignment mark will be subject to a deduction of 5 marks from the mark awarded. Work submitted more than 24 hours late after the submission deadline will be recorded as 0%. Learning outcomes applied in this assessment LO1: analyse and critically evaluate major ideas and practices in the field of people management. LO2: evaluate major contemporary theoretical and managerial perspectives on people management. LO5: engage critically and analytically with literature relating to major developments in the field of people management. LO6: appreciate how research into effective people management underpins thinking in the other, more specialised fields of HRM and HRD practice that you will be studying. LO8: effectively apply HR theories and models to situations and various scenarios. LO 12: develop and express strong, original and well-justified arguments to support your views. Assessment guidelines Produce a 3000-word Individual Coursework (+/- 10%) (excluding the list of references) which offers students the ability to demonstrate their developing knowledge and application of the teaching and learning material covered in weeks 1 to 5. It also encourages students to develop their thoughts and perspectives on contemporary business issues, and be intellectually creative (underpinned by credible resources). Task Students are required to produce a reflective report (LO2/8) on varied leadership approaches taken by different leaders in managing the changes arising from a contemporary issue (i.e. COVID 19). In order to achieve this, the main body of your report must include the following: 1) A brief introduction to the conceptual approaches of leadership and change management (LO1/2). 2) Exploration of the role of flexible leadership and individual perspectives in relation to leaders managing change of the pandemic (discussed through relevant literature, tools and techniques) (LO2/5/8). 3) Critical analysis of why the issue has strategic importance in understanding leadership approaches and their impact on its stakeholders whilst proffering some recommendations (discussed through relevant literature and supported by other contemporary examples) (LO2/6/12). The reflective report requires you to use the relevant module material (ideas, concepts, theories, frameworks and research findings) to inform your evaluation. The assignment encourages you to take a strategic view of what good leadership entails and an evaluation of today’s global leaders in embracing flexibility to managing change whilst dealing with current and emerging global trends. Well established media (e.g. BBC, Financial Times, New York Times, etc) may be used to develop the context of the discussion, but the material used to underpin the research and analysis should be from academic books and/or updated peer-reviewed academic journals. *** Report Format What is a report? A report is written for a clear purpose and to a particular audience. Specific information and evidence are presented, analysed and applied to a particular problem or issue. The information is presented in a clearly structured format making use of sections and headings so that the information is easy to locate and follow. When you are asked to write a report, you will usually be given a report brief which provides you with instructions and guidelines. The report brief may outline the purpose, audience and problem or issue that your report must address, together with any specific requirements for format or structure. This guide offers a general introduction to report writing. What makes a good report? Two of the reasons why reports are used as forms of written assessment are: • to find out what you have learned from your reading, research or experience; • to give you experience of an important skill that is widely used in the work place. An effective report presents and analyses facts and evidence that are relevant to the specific problem or issue of the report brief. All sources used should be acknowledged and referenced throughout, in accordance with the preferred method of your department. The style of writing in a report is usually less discursive than in an essay, with a more direct and economic use of language. A well written report will demonstrate your ability to: • understand the purpose of the report brief and adhere to its specifications; • gather, evaluate and analyse relevant information; • structure material in a logical and coherent order; • present your report in a consistent manner according to the instructions of the report brief; • make appropriate conclusions that are supported by the evidence and analysis of the report; • make thoughtful and practical recommendations where required. The structure of a report The main features of a report are described below to provide a general guide. These should be used in conjunction with the instructions or guidelines provided by your department. Title Page This should briefly but explicitly describe the purpose of the report (if this is not obvious from the title of the work); remember to add your name and student number/assessment number, and which assessment it pertains to. Summary (Abstract) The summary should briefly describe the content of the report. It should cover the aims of the report, what was found and a brief review of the conclusions. Aim for about 1/2 a page in length and avoid detail or discussion; just outline the main points. Remember that the summary is the first thing that is read. It should provide the reader with a clear, helpful overview of the content of the report. Contents (Table of Contents) The contents page should list the different chapters and/or headings together with the page numbers. Your contents page should be presented in such a way that the reader can quickly scan the list of headings and locate a particular part of the report. You may want to number chapter headings and subheadings in addition to providing page references. Whatever numbering system you use, be sure that it is clear and consistent throughout. Introduction The introduction sets the scene for the main body of the report. The aims and objectives of the report should be explained in detail. Any problems or limitations in the scope of the report should be identified, and a description of research methods, the parameters of the research and any necessary background history should be included. Methods Information under this heading may include: a list of research methods used (e.g. literature review using ProQuest resources and the filter criteria applied for each search) and other sources of information and details of selection/rejection; reference to any problems encountered and subsequent changes in procedure. Discussion The main body of the report is where you discuss your material. The literature and evidence you have gathered should be summarised, analysed and discussed with specific reference to the problem or issue. If your discussion section is lengthy you might divide it into section headings. Your points should be grouped and arranged in an order that is logical and easy to follow. Use headings and subheadings to create a clear structure for your material. Use bullet points to present a series of points in an easy-to- follow list. As with the whole report, all sources used should be acknowledged and correctly referenced (remember to use the most credible resources available). Conclusion In the conclusion you should show the overall significance of what has been covered. You may want to remind the reader of the most important points that have been made in the report or highlight what you consider to be the most central issues or findings. However, no new material should be introduced in the conclusion. Remember to specifically answer the initial questions posed. Appendices Under this heading you should include all the supporting information you have used that is not published. This might include tables, graphs, questionnaires, surveys or transcripts. Refer to the appendices in the body of your report. List of References A key feature of academic writing, the list of references should list - in alphabetical order by author - all published sources referred to in your report. There are different styles of using references so be sure to refer to the study guide and check your departmental handbook for guidelines. Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be marked according to the following criteria: 1) Understanding and Reading: The depth of your reading (number, range and quality of sources) and understanding of it. You are expected to read the essential and further readings for the question that you choose. You need to use these readings to support your argument/discussion; you cannot rely on personal opinion or unsupported statements. 2) Critical Analysis: The level of critical analysis in your writing and the quality of the argument developed. You cannot rely on simple description, but have to apply knowledge and theory from the readings to critically engage with the material. 3) Structure: Your ability to develop a clear, logical structure for your essay which addresses the question and guides the reader. Your essay and outline should include a clear introduction, a cogently argued main body, and a conclusion that summarises the argument and answers the overall question. 4) Presentation and Referencing: Your ability to express yourself clearly in English using appropriate terminology, correct spelling and grammar. The extent to which your essay is correctly referenced using the Harvard system of referencing in-text and with a reference list. Section/aspect Content to cover Marks available Introduction General background on the 10 Marks 500 words topic you are going to discuss. Possible definitions for terms relating to the question. What the essay will include and/or leave out (scope). What themes the essay will discuss and the order they are presented. What the essay will argue / demonstrate (thesis statement). Main Body The following structure can be 55 Marks (Understanding, used for discussion of the Reading and Critical themes that you have Analysis) identified: 2000 words T - topic (sentence to introduce the theme or topic of the paragraph) E - example (you could mention an example here to focus the topic) S - support (bring in supporting information from your research / eg. theory, research studies, statistics, legislation, professional guidelines, examples from practice) T - talk about the ideas (strengths, weaknesses, importance, relevance, usefulness, comparison to other ideas). Evaluation and critical discussion of the supporting materials and how they relate to the question under scrutiny - keep the discussion focused on answering the question in the title. Conclusions and Links back to the themes 15 Marks recommendations identified in the introduction. 500-800 words A reminder of what the essay has argued. A recap of the main themes that have been discussed. Proffer some recommendations Formatting, High quality presentation of 20 Marks Structure and the material that conforms to Referencing principles of academic writing (list of references not and contains minimal errors in included in word sentence construction, count) grammar and punctuation. A logical structure was followed. The assignment followed appropriate academic conventions regarding in-text citations and referencing. Total: 3000-3300 Total: 100/100 words Module Title: HR 7003-Managing Financial and Human Resources for Sustainable Business (HR7003) Assessment Title: Assessment Point 1 90-100% 80 – 90% 70 – 79% 60 – 69% 50 – 59% 40 – 49% 20 – 39% 0-19% Highly Outstanding Excellent Very Good Good Quality Acceptable Work does Work fails to Exceptiona Work Work Quality Work Work work with not satisfy meet the l Work some good assessment assessment aspects criteria criteria Exceptional and Excellent Very good Good Adequate Some integration Poor quality of No integration outstanding integration of integration of integration of integration of of the appropriate integration of the of the integration of the the appropriate the the appropriate the appropriate data, appropriate data, appropriate appropriate data, data, appropriate data, data, contextualised contextualised data, contextualised contextualised data, contextualised contextualised with limited with very limited contextualise with commercial with good contextualise with good with good evidence to show evidence to show d with very awareness, evidence to d with evidence to evidence to awareness, awareness, poor evidence business maturity show evidence to show overall show overall business maturity business maturity to show and skill. commercial show awareness, awareness, and skill. and skill. awareness, awareness, commercial business business business business awareness, maturity and maturity and maturity and maturity and business skill. skill. skill. skill. maturity and skill. HR 7003-Managing Financial and Human Resources for Sustainable Business 12 All relevant All relevant Virtually all Most of the Some of the Omissions and Many deficiencies Major theories/concept theories/conce relevant relevant relevant inaccuracies in and omissions in deficiencies ual models ptual models theories/conc theories/conce theories/conce the presented of theories/concept and omissions accurately and accurately and eptual models ptual models ptual models theories/concept ual models. in extensively extensively accurately and accurately accurately ual models. Delivery of theories/conc presented. presented. extensively presented. presented. A Some level of applied theory is eptual Exceptional Excellent presented. Good level reasonable delivery of inadequate or models. application of delivery of High level delivery of applied theory. wholly absent. Delivery of delivery of theory and applied theory. delivery of applied theory. applied applied theory. supporting applied theory is materials. theory. wholly absent. Exceptionally Highly Very High standard Good standard Reasonable Low quality of No innovative. innovative. Very innovative. of innovation. of innovation. standard of innovation. Poor reasonable Outstanding professional and Strongly Professional Appropriate innovation. and inadequate attempt at professional and appropriate professional and delivery and Reasonably delivery and innovation. appropriate delivery and and appropriate language. appropriate language. Poor and delivery and language. Very appropriate delivery and Many referencing delivery and Referencing inadequate language. well referenced delivery and language. errors. language. very poor. delivery and Accurate throughout. language. Referencing Referencing was language. referencing Well most accurate. inaccurate and/or Referencing throughout. referenced inconsistent. absent. throughout. HR 7003-Managing Financial and Human Resources for Sustainable Business 13