Fluent Essays

This week, you studied different kinds of variables.  select an empirical article that covers a topic of interest to you and has clearly identified variables, ensuring that the study is recent (i.e., conducted within the past five years). Describe the methods used. In addition, discuss the variables and scales used in each study. At the conclusion of your discussion, describe how you would code these variables in Microsoft Excel. 3-4 pages Support your responses with examples. Cite any sources in APA format. 10/14/21, 10:32 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420927&evalObjectType… 1/4 PSY2061 Week 3 Project Rubric Course: PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (9-10) 10 points Satisfactory (C Range) (11-12) 12 points Proficient (B Range) (12-13) 13 points Exemplary (A Range) (14-15) 15 points Criterion Score Fulfillment of Assignment Expectation s / 15 Student did not submit assignment Submission does not meet assignment expectations. It does not address all parts of the assignment. Submission relies on unsupported claims (e.g., personal conjecture, judging assertions without backing evidence). Submission includes excessive use of direct quotations. Submission does not clearly demonstrate critical thinking, synthesis of information, or application of research and course material. Submission meets most assignment expectations. It addresses all parts of the assignment, though some parts may be more fully developed than others. While submission may include some unsupported claims (e.g., personal conjecture, judging assertions), there are also informed and validated conclusions throughout, supported with cited evidence. Submission may have a few direct quotations. However, there is at least an Submission meets all assignment expectations and addresses all parts of the assignment. Submission includes almost no unsupported claims (e.g., personal conjecture, judging assertions); rather, most of the submission has informed and validated conclusions supported with cited evidence. Submission has no direct quotations, or a couple of quotes may be used, but they are explained and analyzed in detail to demonstrate understanding of the content. The required Submission meets all assignment expectations and addresses all parts of the assignment. Submission includes no unsupported claims (e.g., personal conjecture, judging assertions). Rather, the submission has informed and validated conclusions that demonstrate both breadth and depth of information and are supported by evidence from cited sources. Submission is completely original to the writer, yet gives credit to material that informed the student on the 10/14/21, 10:32 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420927&evalObjectType… 2/4 Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (9-10) 10 points Satisfactory (C Range) (11-12) 12 points Proficient (B Range) (12-13) 13 points Exemplary (A Range) (14-15) 15 points Criterion Score attempt at explaining and analyzing the direct quotations. The required number and types of supporting resources may or may not be included. Resources may not be appropriate (such as non- scholarly sources). Submission demonstrates some concerted effort at critical thinking, synthesis of information, or application of research and course material. number and types of supporting resources are utilized. Most of the submission demonstrates concerted effort at critical thinking, synthesis of information, and application of research and course material. issue. The submission demonstrates critical thinking, synthesis of information, and application of research and course material through inclusion of support from multiple scholarly sources in addition to the minimum required for the assignment. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) 2 points Satisfactory (C Range) 3 points Proficient (B Range) 4 points Exemplary (A Range) 5 points Criterion Score 10/14/21, 10:32 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420927&evalObjectType… 3/4 Total / 20 Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) 2 points Satisfactory (C Range) 3 points Proficient (B Range) 4 points Exemplary (A Range) 5 points Criterion Score APA formatting for structure, citations, and reference list / 5 Student did not submit assignment There may be no attempt at APA formatting (e.g., no citations and/or reference list). If a reference list is included, it does not use APA formatting. In- text citations are missing or improperly formatted. Required elements are missing, such as a title page or abstract (when required). While APA formatting is attempted, there are many errors. There may be some missing citations, incorrectly formatted citations, disagreement between citations and references, and/or errors on the reference list, though it is apparent that the student attempted APA formatting. Title page and/or abstract (when required) may not be properly formatted. There are only a few minor formatting errors in citations or the reference list. Title page and abstract (where required) are included and properly formatted. Headings, when used, are properly formatted, though there may be minor errors in levels used. APA formatting is accurate throughout the paper, including the title page, abstract (when required), and the reference list. Headings are included when appropriate, using the proper levels, and properly formatted. 10/14/21, 10:32 PM Rubric Assessment - PSY2061-Research Methods Lab SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82596&evalObjectId=420927&evalObjectType… 4/4 Overall Score No Submission 0 points minimum Emerging (F through D Range) 12 points minimum Satisfactory (C Range) 15 points minimum Proficient (B Range) 17 points minimum Exemplary (A Range) 20 points minimum Operationalizing and Managing Data.html Operationalizing and Managing Data You may recall that operational definitions provide specific details about how a dependent variable is measured. These definitions are included in research studies so others will understand what was measured and the study can be replicated. After the variables have been operationalized, the behavior is assessed and analyzed. Let’s consider an example of a study looking at whether brain lesions in a specific area of the brain will alter their ability to navigate a maze. Operational Definition: Example When conducting a research study, you can choose to measure your variables in any one scale of measurement. Consider the rats and the maze learning illustration. You can use an ordinal scale to determine which rat came in first, second, or third. You can also measure the time it took for the rats to complete the maze, which would be a ratio scale. Regardless of the scale of measurement, when you specify the way to measure the variable, you are providing an operational definition.  In the study referred above, you talked about the variables in the table: Variable Type Action Taken Example Independent Manipulate Brain lesion or not Dependent Measure Time to run maze The dependent variable was operationalized as a ratio scale measurement. Recall that the operational definition was the time it took the rats to run through a maze as measured with a timing device. You were provided with examples from the other scales of measurement, including nominal, ordinal, and interval. Now lets discuss how operationalizing variables and scales of measurement are related to analyzing data using Microsoft Excel. You will begin by learning how to enter data into Microsoft Excel.