Fluent Essays

Welcome to Week 4 of the course! In Week 3, you learned about designing a job description for a healthcare organization. The week also focused on understanding performance management in healthcare organizations. In addition, you examined the common practices and processes in addressing employee relations. This week, you will learn some exciting and informative facts about healthcare recruitment, selection, and retention. This week also focuses on methods, metrics, and best practices related to recruitment, selection, and retention. Lets begin this week by understanding what recruitment, selection, and retention mean. Your Learning Objectives for the Week: Explain the importance of the HR function in healthcare organizations in terms of strategic planning. Critique the management of compensation and benefits packages Utilize critical thinking to analyze major HR challenges facing healthcare organizations and evaluate methods of minimizing the negative impact. 10/10/21, 6:25 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406873&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=6574&gr… 1/4 Close Print RubricSUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Course: MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 Response No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points Satisfactory (C: 28- 31) 31 points Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points Exemplary (A: 36- 40) 40 points Criterion Score Quality of Initial Posting / 40 No initial posting exists to evaluate. The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation. The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment. The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed. The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought- out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in- depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings. Participation No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points Criterion Score 10/10/21, 6:25 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406873&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=6574&gr… 2/4 Participation No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points Criterion Score Participation in Discussion / 20 No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum. May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other students post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or “I agree. *Comments are off topic. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful conversation and may include a follow-up question. Writing No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points Criterion Score 10/10/21, 6:25 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406873&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=6574&gr… 3/4 Total / 80 Writing No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points Criterion Score Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy / 20 No postings for which to evaluate language and grammar exist. Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling, use of slang, and incomplete or missing citations and references. If required for the assignment, did not use course, text, and/or outside readings (where relevant) to support work. Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for initial post but not comments to other students. Sources include course/text readings but outside sources (when relevant) include non- academic/authoritative, such as Wikis and .com resources. Minor errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial posting are present. Minor errors in formatting citations and references may exist. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and some of the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules). Minor to no errors exist in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in both the initial post and comments to others. Formatting of citations and references is correct. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules). 10/10/21, 6:25 PM Rubric Assessment - MHC6306-Human Resource Management in Healthcare Organizations SU01 - South University https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=81520&evalObjectId=406873&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=6574&gr… 4/4 Overall Score No Submission 0 points minimum There was no submission for this assignment. Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum Satisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies for this assignment. Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment. Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum Proficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment. Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimum The competencies for this assignment have been mastered.