Fluent Essays

MUST BE IN APA FORMATThis is a two-part requirement. Part 1: Describe or define Systems Thinking. Part 2: As an organization operates as an open system, discuss HOW systems thinking [a function of Systems Theory] assists a manager in partnership with an HR Business Partner with adapting the manager’s department so the department is aligned with the business’s strategy.In Systems Theory, a business demonstrates the properties of an open system (Senge, 1990; Luhmann, 1995). As an open system, a business forms an interdependency relationship with its external environment (von Bertalanffy, 1974). From the external environment, a business depends on such resources as suppliers, customers, technologies, and available labor to operate and survive (Hitt et al., 2018). Because of this dependency relationship between a business and its market environment, a business must adapt to changing market conditions. In response to changing market conditions, a business forms a strategy. The business strategy sets the direction of the business and identifies strategic goals. Business strategy also identifies how a business will adapt. The adaption process begins with changing the internal structure of a business. The structure includes specialized jobs integrated into designed work processes to achieve a specific planned outcome. These specialized jobs integrated into designed work processes form a network of unskilled, skilled, technicians, managers, and executive employees. The network of employees represents another concept of an open system; they form interdependent and interconnected relationships (Armstrong, 2016). The business structure is designed to accomplish a business’ purpose. The employees within the structure of networked jobs achieve the business’s purpose through their level of performance (Noe et al., 2019). This Weekly Topic Response examines a business as an open system and the application of systems thinking. vc01_summ_wtr_rubric_05_05_20.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview Online Weekly Topic Response Rubric – Wayland Baptist University NAME: ________________________________________ Course: MGMT 5309 – VC01 Unacceptable Inadequate Adequate 0.0 1.0 to 7.0 8.0 WDT Posting Criteria 1. Content Understanding Student presented a partial understanding of key concepts or ideas relevant to the topic. Student’s presented no understanding of key concepts or ideas relevant to the topic. Student’s did not apply key terms. Response contained vague or abstract remarks. Student’s applied few key terms. Response contained several vague or abstract remarks. WDT Posting Criteria 2. Student’s response demonstrated no critical thinking in the exploration of topics or issues. Reasoning (the ability to Student response contained little critical thinking with only a surface exploration of topics or issues was presented. Student provided few definitions or explanation of key terms, concepts, and/or theories that supported an argument. Student supported few claims and/or arguments with evidence. Student only used the textbook or used one outside source to support claims. Student did not define or explain key terms, concepts, or theories that supported an argument. Student did not support claims and/or arguments with evidence. Student used no outside sources to support claims. DATE: June 1, 2020 Weekly Topic Response #2 Proficient Exceptional 9.0 10.0 (the comprehension of the content under discussion) Student presented an Student presented a Student presented an adequate clear understanding of exceptional understanding of key key concepts or ideas understanding of key concepts or ideas relevant to the topic. concepts or ideas relevant to the topic. relevant to the topic. Student’s response Student’s response Student’s clearly applied some key terms correctly applied key applied key concepts or and contained little concepts or ideas. ideas. vague or abstract remarks. use the content to explore issues, concepts, and/or theories. Student response Student response Student response contained some critical contained critical contained critical thinking skills with thinking with some inthinking with an insome in-depth depth exploration of depth exploration of exploration of topics topics and/or issues. topics and/or issues. and/or issues. Student defined or Student defined or Student defined or explained some key clearly explained most clearly explained all key terms, concepts, key terms, concepts, terms, concepts, and/or and/or theories that and/or theories that theories that supported supported an supported an an argument. argument. argument. Student supported some claims and/or arguments with evidence. Student use the textbook and one outside source to support claims. Student supported most claims and arguments with evidence. Student used the textbook as well as two outside sources to support claims. WDT Posting Criteria 3. APA Writing Style Application (the application of the APA writing style) Three of more APA Two APA errors. One APA error. errors. No application of APA writing style. Student supported all claims and arguments with evidence. Student used the textbook as well as three or more outside sources to support claims. No APA errors. Writing Criteria 4. Language (English) Conventions and Graduate Level Writing Response contained numerous syntax errors. Response contained numerous English convention errors. Student’s response was not written at the graduate level. Response contained several syntax errors. Response contained some syntax errors. Response contained few syntax errors. Response contained no syntax errors. Response contained several English convention errors. Response was written at less than at a graduate level. Response contained some English convention errors. Response was written at somewhat at a graduate level. Response contained few English convention errors. Response was written at a graduate level. Response contained no English convention errors. Response was clearly written at a graduate student level. Pts Online Weekly Topic Response Rubric – Wayland Baptist University WTR Posting Criteria 1. Content Understanding ______ x 4 WTR Posting Criteria 2. Reasoning_____ x 3 WTR Posting Criteria 3. APA Writing Style Application Language______ x 2 WTR Writing Criteria 4. Language_____ x 1 Total Point Achieve Percentage = ______ ÷ 250 = _______ Possible Point Value \% 6.0 Weekly Topic Response Points Achieved Peer Feedback provided to: __________________________________________________________________ Unacceptable Inadequate 0.0 1.0 to 7.0 Peer Feedback Criteria 1. Netiquette The student did not provide peer-to-peer feedback Student’s feedback to a peer contained little respect. When disagreeing with a peer’s post, the student did so in an impolite manner. Adequate 8.0 Proficient 9.0 Exceptional 10.0 Feedback to a peer’s post contained somewhat respectful remarks. When disagreeing with a peer’s post, the student did so in a somewhat respectfully manner. Feedback to a peer’s post contained mostly respectful remarks. When disagreeing with a peer’s post, the student did so in a somewhat respectfully manner. Feedback to peer’s post contained respectful remarks. When disagreeing with a peer’s post, the student did so in a respectfully manner. Pts Feedback Criteria 2. Feedback to a Peer’s Weekly Discussion Topic Post The student did not provide peer-to-peer feedback Feedback dialogue contained little reflective comments and questions, OR the student provided little feedback to a peer. Feedback dialogue contained some reflective comments and questions and provided valid feedback to a peer. Feedback dialogue contained reflective comments and/or questions and provided useful feedback to a peer. Feedback dialogue contained in-depth, reflective comments and/or questions and provided excellent feedback to a peer. The student did not provide peer-to-peer feedback Feedback supported little continued learning of the topic, issues, concepts, and/or theories. Feedback provided some continued learning of the topic, issues, concepts, and/or theories. Feedback provided continued learning on the topic, issues, concepts, and/or theories. Feedback provided exceptional learning on the topic, issues, concepts, and/or theories. Weekly Discussion Topic Points Achieved Peer Feedback Criteria 1. Netiquette_______ x 4 Feedback Criteria 2. Feedback to a Peer’s Discussion Board Post_______ x 6 Total Point Achieve Percentage = ______ ÷ 160 = _______ Possible Feedback Point Value 1.00 Feedback Points Achieved Weekly Topic Response was submitted Late Total Points Achieved on Weekly Topic Response \% ... Purchase answer to see full attachment