Fluent Essays

Submit your AP Rough Draft here by 11:59pm on Friday, May 22nd.Drafts should:be at least 1250 words (body of the essay only!)rely on at least 5 outside sources (4 of which should be brand new for the AP; see the Prompt for Final Draft requirements!)have an Annotated Bibliography/Works Cited page that explains each source and its usefulness to your argument (hint: see the Sketching the Conversation assignment for some of those insights.)You will be assigned a Peer Review partner just after midnight on Sunday, and you will have until Tuesday, May 26th, to complete and submit your Workshop Letter.MLA formatThesisFood sustainability has been an issue of great issue concern across the globe and more sore in developing countries. Most of the developing countries have been on the run to strategise and define ways they can achieve continuous availability of food for their population. However, some of the approaches applied have not been of much significance as far as food security is concerned. This paper, therefore, aims to explore why some of these initiatives taken that has not been much effective as far as food sustainability is concerned.Mass production of food.One of the solutions that were adopted in the fight against food insecurity was to advocate for the mass production of food. This means that there was a need to create more space for agricultural use, and this lead to the clearing of forests to get space for agricultural production. In the process, a lot of environmental damages have been caused. Some of the consequences that have been incurred from land clearing include eutrophication and the depletion of biodiversity (Meyfroidt, 2018). Eutrophication has caused the growth of algal blooms, which are sometimes toxic to aquatic life. And some of the aquatic lives like the fish are sources of food. Moreover, loss of biodiversity has led to the extinction to some of the animal and plant species (Busari, 2015). The mass production of food has drained water, nutrients, land space, and even made others homeless and at the same time.Use of fertilizersMassive food production calls have advised the people to use fertilizers to achieve high crop yields, which indeed could be true, but the use of fertilizers has led to reduced land fertility, and some plants have also been damaged by fertilizers. Chemical fertilizers, for example, have the nitrogen, phosphorus, and the potassium need by plants for fast growth and proper yield (Busari, 2015). However, the nitrogen that is present in these types of fertilizers has been pointed out to be of great concern to the environment. For instance, it is known for causing soil acidity by lowering the soil pH (Ramankutty, 2018). Once the soil acidity is destroyed, fertility is also affected, and this means the soil cannot be of good use in the future. These fertilizers, therefore, have a problem of being effective for short term use, but they cannot be relied on to achieve a continuous flow of food products.DecisionSince the above approaches to achieving food sustainability are biased in the sense that they are not environmentally friendly, there is every need to learn more about the environment and food production methods and find out some of the most effective techniques that will be both environmentally friendly, and at the same time, they help us achieve food sustainability. This is a big challenge, and therefore all food stakeholders should invest more in research to find out some of these other methods that allow us to achieve food security in a good environment.It is important, therefore, that in as much as we need food in our households, it is equally important to understand the dangers that come to us if we fail to observe environmental conservation. The authorities should, therefore, not focus on food productivity at the detriments of the environment since this will even cause more problems than the problem that was being solved. Therefore the issue of food sustainability should not be substituted with another problem of environmental degradation in the process of solving it.Reference.Ramankutty, N., Mehrabi, Z., Waha, K., Jarvis, L., Kremen, C., Herrero, M., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2018). Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and f ap_prompt_final_s20__1_.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview Research Project Part Two: Advocacy The second half of your quarter-long research project, the AP asks that you ​1)​ ​introduce and evaluate one or more significant efforts to address the problem you described in your CP; 2) develop an argument about which of the efforts to address the problem work best, explain why, and offer possible next steps; OR make the case that none of the efforts to address the problem works, explain why, and offer possible next steps.​ ​Unlike the CP, an expository essay that asks you to use your research to describe the problem, the AP requires you to stake out a clear position in a thesis statement that you must defend through deeply engaged research. An advocate takes a position in a debate or conflict and works to solve problems. Social justice advocates, for example, aim to give voice to the marginalized and defend the vulnerable from harm by forging resolutions among stakeholders where intractable problems persist. To advance their aims, advocates must be strategic: they must consider whether or not various modes of redress will effectively mitigate or resolve the problem at hand. And to be strategic, they must also be informed. You, too, must be deeply informed about the advocacy landscape and ongoing conversations concerning your topic and the problems associated with it. Your initial research for the AP should explore the various efforts to shape public opinion through the media; to change policies; to institute new laws or amend existing ones; or to pursue litigation. As you examine these efforts, you should assess their short- and long-term outcomes; their costs (in a variety of senses: cultural, economic, personal, moral, institutional, to name a few) and benefits; their relative fitness in comparison to one another; their ability to produce equitable outcomes; and the obstacles that stand in their way. Thinking about obstacles necessitates thinking about rhetorical context. The role of public opinion, for example, has always been instrumental (for better and worse) in shaping advocacy efforts. Advocates must consider the values expressed through social affiliations--political, institutional, religious, cultural, and regional. Sometimes these considerations involve compromise (advocates have terms for these compromises: “respectability politics” is one; “matters of expediency,” another). Where there is compromise that bends to corporate interests or public opinion, there may exist other kinds of compromise, such as short term solutions that satisfy demands in the present but fail to address damaging consequences in the long term. You should account for similar dynamics in the representation of advocacy efforts you examine. 1 Indeed, you will learn that few advocacy efforts enjoy universal support, and accounting for the range of attitudes toward and characterizations of your chosen efforts—some you may agree with, others you may strongly contest—will strengthen your advocacy analysis. By the time you complete the AP, you should be able to: ● Write a developed thesis statement that clearly and concisely articulates the central claims of your argument. ● Develop your argument by analyzing the positions of academics and other experts, including those who offer perspectives that are not in agreement with your own. You should continue to practice the major skills from the CP in terms of: ● Practicing information literacy by assessing how and why you are giving authority to certain sources and crafting effective annotations that will help you to compose a developed essay ● Integrating sources of generic variety and purpose with attention to their argumentative purpose and rhetorical effect ● Developing your command of integrating a variety of quotation, summary, and paraphrase ● Employing organization and style appropriate for addressing a general academic audience ● Collaborating to give and receive constructive feedback ● Incorporating multimodal evidence for specific rhetorical purposes. ● Using a standard citation system, and avoiding plagiarism Assignment Requirements Process work​ is required to be eligible to submit a final draft for a grade. This may include but is not limited to a proposal or prospectus and multiple essay drafts. Late or incomplete process work may result in a grade penalty on the final draft. At a ​minimum​ the argument in your AP should integrate evidence from ​6-8 new sources​, at least two of which should involve complex, comprehensive arguments that substantively consider the obstacles at work in solving the problem you addressed in your CP. You may continue to use relevant sources that you found while researching for the Contexts Project, but at least 6-8 of the sources you use here will need to be new, meaning that you did not cite them in your CP. ​Keep in mind that the total number of sources for the entire project’s bibliography is 12-20 sources. Your final submission should be an approximately ​1750-word ​multimodal​ composition​. It should be formatted in M ​ LA style​, with parenthetical citations, an Annotated Bibliography (aka, Works Cited page with annotations), and a descriptive academic title. 2 ... Purchase answer to see full attachment