Fluent Essays

- write a short essay (750 words)- As you read the article and take notes, remember that the point is not to summarize the article but to identify the thesis, assess the evidence used, and to evaluate the interpretations or arguments.Please note that a critique also need not be negative; indeed, you should address the positive and negative aspects of the article. Do try, however, to avoid spending too much time on the article’s structure and organization; the ideas, arguments, and evidence matter more. - Your answer should follow the same rules of grammar etc that you would use in formal essays. Avoid clichés, slang and conversational language wherever possible. - Additional sources are not required but you may integrate them if you wish. Citations to the article may be made in text. For example: Dramatic as it was, the Song Agricultural Revolution was nevertheless a revolution from above. (64). If you do cite external sources, use Chicago StyleOrganize article1. The introductory paragraph should contain the title of the article being reviewed and the authors’ name. It should also have a few brief words on the major themes or issues under discussion2. A short paragraph(s) should be devoted to summarizing the article. In your own words, summarize the content and describe the major themes or issues of the article. What is the author’s thesis? What is the purpose and the central argument or arguments of the articles?3. Evaluate or critique the article being reviewed. It is convincing and does the evidence support the conclusions being drawn? Does the article contribute to an ongoing historical debate or to an established school of thought? Please note that your critique must be scholarly. You may hate the article, it may be too long, badly written, and poorly organized but you need to express that criticism properly. For example, you might note that the author listed numerous examples without properly linking them to their central thesis and this made the article too long. Avoid phrases such as “I think this a good/bad article”. The entire review is your opinion. In a short review it is also best to use your own words and avoid long quotations from the articles. Its better writing and excessive use of quotes will likely mean a lower grade.4. Conclusion: summarize your evaluation and present a final assessment of the article and your overall impressions. Are there any parallels to the course material that you can think of? the_impact_of_new_world_food_crops_on_the_diet_and_economy_of_china_and_india__1600_1900.pdf midterm_guidelines.pdf midterm_guidelines.pdf guidelines.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview Raymond Grew, Food in Global History, (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1999). Brescia University College History 2158A (530) Food in World History Midterm Exam Due: 29 May 2020 Historians are known for lengthy books but journal articles are one of the principal ways in which professional historians present their ideas and arguments. Your midterm is a critical review of one such article and the purpose is to not only broaden your understanding of the global impact of the Columbian Exchange but also to hone your critical reading skills and to become more familiar with evaluation criteria that you can then apply to other courses and disciplines. The Article The Spanish conquistador Bernal Díaz complained of the “misery of maize cakes” during the Spanish conquest of Mesoamerica. The Spanish, and others, did eventually embrace New World foods and this acceptance helped to transform culinary practices and traditions across the globe. This acceptance, however, was not always done quickly, without difficulty or even uniformly. Sucheta Mazumdar’s “The Impact of New World Food Crops on the Diet and Economy of China and India, 1600-1900” explores the adoption and reception of American crops in India and China and she attempts to explain why some crops were more readily adopted in some areas than in others. Write a short essay (750 words) that critically analyzes and interprets Mazumdar’s article. As you read the article and take notes, remember that the point is not to summarize the article but to identify the thesis, assess the evidence used, and to evaluate the interpretations or arguments.Please note that a critique also need not be negative; indeed, you should address the positive and negative aspects of the article. Do try, however, to avoid spending too much time on the article’s structure and organization; the ideas, arguments, and evidence matter more. Your answer should follow the same rules of grammar etc that you would use in formal essays. Avoid clichés, slang and conversational language wherever possible. Please refer to the Reading, Writing and Researching for History website available on the course OWL site as needed. Additional sources are not required but you may integrate them if you wish. Citations to the article may be made in text. For example: Dramatic as it was, the Song Agricultural Revolution was nevertheless a revolution from above. (64). If you do cite external sources, use Chicago Style and/or consult the following guide http://brescia.uwo.ca/library/wpcontent/uploads/sites/12/delightful-downloads/2018/01/Chicago-17-Dec2017-1.pdf Here are some other links that may prove useful: How to Write a Critical Review of a Journal Article https://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm Writing a Critical Review - https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review Organizing and Writing your Article Review The introductory paragraph should contain the title of the article being reviewed and the authors’ name. It should also have a few brief words on the major themes or issues under discussion. Evaluate or critique the article being reviewed. It is convincing and does the evidence support the conclusions being drawn? Does the article contribute to an ongoing historical debate or to an established school of thought? Please note that your critique must be scholarly. You may hate the article, it may be too long, badly written, and poorly organized but you need to express that criticism properly. For example, you might note that the author listed numerous examples without properly linking them to their central thesis and this made the article too long. Avoid phrases such as “I think this a good/bad article”. The entire review is your opinion. In a short review it is also best to use your own words and avoid long quotations from the articles. Its better writing and excessive use of quotes will likely mean a lower grade. A short paragraph(s) should be devoted to summarizing the article. In your own words, summarize the content and describe the major themes or issues of the article. What is the author’s thesis? What is the purpose and the central argument or arguments of the articles? Conclusion: summarize your evaluation and present a final assessment of the article and your overall impressions. Are there any parallels to the course material that you can think of? Please keep in mind that there is no right answer when reviewing an article. You are entitled to whatever opinion you have of the article but the way to do well on this exam is not to simply state that you agree or disagree with the author but to provide a detailed analysis/critique of the article. As long as you do that and provide evidence (from the article and/or other sources) to back up your claims youll be fine. The exam should be no longer than 750 words. An electronic copy must be submitted to turnitin.com by 11.55 PM on 29 May 2020. Students may access turnitin.com Students who experience through the OWL assignment page. technical problems with Simply logon to the course OWL site turnitin.com are encouraged to and click on the Assignments link contact the Information and then open the Midterm link and Technology Services Support scroll down to the submissions Centre (519-661-3800 or ext. section. Once uploaded your 83800). assignment is transmitted to http://www.uwo.ca/its/helpdesk/ turnitin.com Brescia University College History 2158A (530) Food in World History Midterm Exam Due: 29 May 2020 Historians are known for lengthy books but journal articles are one of the principal ways in which professional historians present their ideas and arguments. Your midterm is a critical review of one such article and the purpose is to not only broaden your understanding of the global impact of the Columbian Exchange but also to hone your critical reading skills and to become more familiar with evaluation criteria that you can then apply to other courses and disciplines. The Article The Spanish conquistador Bernal Díaz complained of the “misery of maize cakes” during the Spanish conquest of Mesoamerica. The Spanish, and others, did eventually embrace New World foods and this acceptance helped to transform culinary practices and traditions across the globe. This acceptance, however, was not always done quickly, without difficulty or even uniformly. Sucheta Mazumdar’s “The Impact of New World Food Crops on the Diet and Economy of China and India, 1600-1900” explores the adoption and reception of American crops in India and China and she attempts to explain why some crops were more readily adopted in some areas than in others. Write a short essay (750 words) that critically analyzes and interprets Mazumdar’s article. As you read the article and take notes, remember that the point is not to summarize the article but to identify the thesis, assess the evidence used, and to evaluate the interpretations or arguments.Please note that a critique also need not be negative; indeed, you should address the positive and negative aspects of the article. Do try, however, to avoid spending too much time on the article’s structure and organization; the ideas, arguments, and evidence matter more. Your answer should follow the same rules of grammar etc that you would use in formal essays. Avoid clichés, slang and conversational language wherever possible. Please refer to the Reading, Writing and Researching for History website available on the course OWL site as needed. Additional sources are not required but you may integrate them if you wish. Citations to the article may be made in text. For example: Dramatic as it was, the Song Agricultural Revolution was nevertheless a revolution from above. (64). If you do cite external sources, use Chicago Style and/or consult the following guide http://brescia.uwo.ca/library/wpcontent/uploads/sites/12/delightful-downloads/2018/01/Chicago-17-Dec2017-1.pdf Here are some other links that may prove useful: How to Write a Critical Review of a Journal Article https://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm Writing a Critical Review - https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review Organizing and Writing your Article Review The introductory paragraph should contain the title of the article being reviewed and the authors’ name. It should also have a few brief words on the major themes or issues under discussion. Evaluate or critique the article being reviewed. It is convincing and does the evidence support the conclusions being drawn? Does the article contribute to an ongoing historical debate or to an established school of thought? Please note that your critique must be scholarly. You may hate the article, it may be too long, badly written, and poorly organized but you need to express that criticism properly. For example, you might note that the author listed numerous examples without properly linking them to their central thesis and this made the article too long. Avoid phrases such as “I think this a good/bad article”. The entire review is your opinion. In a short review it is also best to use your own words and avoid long quotations from the articles. Its better writing and excessive use of quotes will likely mean a lower grade. A short paragraph(s) should be devoted to summarizing the article. In your own words, summarize the content and describe the major themes or issues of the article. What is the author’s thesis? What is the purpose and the central argument or arguments of the articles? Conclusion: summarize your evaluation and present a final assessment of the article and your overall impressions. Are there any parallels to the course material that you can think of? Please keep in mind that there is no right answer when reviewing an article. You are entitled to whatever opinion you have of the article but the way to do well on this exam is not to simply state that you agree or disagree with the author but to provide a detailed analysis/critique of the article. As long as you do that and provide evidence (from the article and/or other sources) to back up your claims youll be fine. The exam should be no longer than 750 words. An electronic copy must be submitted to turnitin.com by 11.55 PM on 29 May 2020. Students may access turnitin.com Students who experience through the OWL assignment page. technical problems with Simply logon to the course OWL site turnitin.com are encouraged to and click on the Assignments link contact the Information and then open the Midterm link and Technology Services Support scroll down to the submissions Centre (519-661-3800 or ext. section. Once uploaded your 83800). assignment is transmitted to http://www.uwo.ca/its/helpdesk/ turnitin.com Brescia University College History 2158A (530) Food in World History Midterm Exam Due: 29 May 2020 Historians are known for lengthy books but journal articles are one of the principal ways in which professional historians present their ideas and arguments. Your midterm is a critical review of one such article and the purpose is to not only broaden your understanding of the global impact of the Columbian Exchange but also to hone your critical reading skills and to become more familiar with evaluation criteria that you can then apply to other courses and disciplines. The Article The Spanish conquistador Bernal Díaz complained of the “misery of maize cakes” during the Spanish conquest of Mesoamerica. The Spanish, and others, did eventually embrace New World foods and this acceptance helped to transform culinary practices and traditions across the globe. This acceptance, however, was not always done quickly, without difficulty or even uniformly. Sucheta Mazumdar’s “The Impact of New World Food Crops on the Diet and Economy of China and India, 1600-1900” explores the adoption and reception of American crops in India and China and she attempts to explain why some crops were more readily adopted in some areas than in others. Write a short essay (750 words) that critically analyzes and interprets Mazumdar’s article. As you read the article and take notes, remember that the point is not to summarize the article but to identify the thesis, assess the evidence used, and to evaluate the interpretations or arguments.Please note that a critique also need not be negative; indeed, you should address the positive and negative aspects of the article. Do try, however, to avoid spending too much time on the article’s structure and organization; the ideas, arguments, and evidence matter more. Your answer should follow the same rules of grammar etc that you would use in formal essays. Avoid clichés, slang and conversational language wherever possible. Please refer to the Reading, Writing and Researching for History website available on the course OWL site as needed. Additional sources are not required but you may integrate them if you wish. Citations to the article may be made in text. For example: Dramatic as it was, the Song Agricultural Revolution was nevertheless a revolution from above. (64). If you do cite external sources, use Chicago Style and/or consult the following guide http://brescia.uwo.ca/library/wpcontent/uploads/sites/12/delightful-downloads/2018/01/Chicago-17-Dec2017-1.pdf Here are some other links that may prove useful: How to Write a Critical Review of a Journal Article https://library.queensu.ca/inforef/criticalreview.htm Writing a Critical Review - https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review Organizing and Writing your Article Review The introductory paragraph should contain the title of the article being reviewed and the authors’ name. It should also have a few brief words on the major themes or issues under discussion. Evaluate or critique the article being reviewed. It is convincing and does the evidence support the conclusions being drawn? Does the article contribute to an ongoing historical debate or to an established school of thought? Please note that your critique must be scholarly. You may hate the article, it may be too long, badly written, and poorly organized but you need to express that criticism properly. For example, you might note that the author listed numerous examples without properly linking them to their central thesis and this made the article too long. Avoid phrases such as “I think this a good/bad article”. The entire review is your opinion. In a short review it is also best to use your own words and avoid long quotations from the articles. Its better writing and excessive use of quotes will likely mean a lower grade. A short paragraph(s) should be devoted to summarizing the article. In your own words, summarize the content and describe the major themes or issues of the article. What is the author’s thesis? What is the purpose and the central argument or arguments of the articles? Conclusion: summarize your evaluation and present a final assessment of the article and your overall impressions. Are there any parallels to the course material that you can think of? Please keep in mind that there is no right answer when reviewing an article. You are entitled to whatever opinion you have of the article but the way to do well on this exam is not to simply state that you agree or disagree with the author but to provide a detailed analysis/critique of the article. As long as you do that and provide evidence (from the article and/or other sources) to back up your claims youll be fine. The exam should be no longer than 750 words. An electronic copy must be submitted to turnitin.com by 11.55 PM on 29 May 2020. Students may access turnitin.com Students who experience through the OWL assignment page. technical problems with Simply logon to the course OWL site turnitin.com are encouraged to and click on the Assignments link contact the Information and then open the Midterm link and Technology Services Support scroll down to the submissions Centre (519-661-3800 or ext. section. Once uploaded your 83800). assignment is transmitted to http://www.uwo.ca/its/helpdesk/ turnitin.com ... Purchase answer to see full attachment