Fluent Essays

Reflect on the content assigned for Week #3 using the below questions as a guide, at a minimum:How important was establishing drug standards to the evolution of pharmacy as a profession?The USP is celebrating its bicentennial in 2020. How relevant is it today?What made you curious about this weeks content?As the American pharmaceutical industry matured, what has been the primary positive things that have occurred? What have been the most negative things?What impact has the maturation of the pharmaceutical industry had on health care in the United States?Are there parallels between the late 1910s and today (100 + years later)?minimun 2 pages of reflectionAt least 3 cited sources pharmacopeia.docx discussiongradingrubric_nsu_summer_2020_media_copy.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview Pharmacopeia Please read, view, and reflect on the following materials: Dr. Robert McCarthy PowerPoint ֎ Evolution of the Pharmacopeia posted here Also review the following websites: • o o Advancing Quality: https://www.usp.org/about (Links to an external site.) Timeline: https://www.usp.org/about/usp-timeline (Links to an external site.) Industry Please read, view, and reflect on the following materials: Dr. Don Vogt and Dr. Michael Montagne Articles ֎ Process of Pharmaceutical Development: I available at the following URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249017438_The_Process_of_Drug_Develop ment_I_The_Historical_Interplay_of_Political_Economics_Research_and_Regulation (Links to an external site.) ֎ Process of Pharmaceutical Development: II available at the following URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240534302_The_Process_of_Drug_Develop ment_II_The_Historical_Interplay_of_Therapeutics_Clinical_Research_and_Scientific_Educ ation (Links to an external site.) Dr. Robert McCarthy PowerPoint ֎ American Pharmaceutical Industry posted here AIHP PowerPoint ֎ Growth of the Pharmaceutical Industry posted here Reflect on the content assigned for Week #3 using the below questions as a guide, at a minimum: • o o o o o o How important was establishing drug standards to the evolution of pharmacy as a profession? The USP is celebrating its bicentennial in 2020. How relevant is it today? What made you curious about this weeks content? As the American pharmaceutical industry matured, what has been the primary positive things that have occurred? What have been the most negative things? What impact has the maturation of the pharmaceutical industry had on health care in the United States? Are there parallels between the late 1910s and today (100 + years later)? PHRE 5345 Pharmacists, Pharmaceuticals, and the Media ONLINE ANALYTICAL DISCUSSION INFORMATION Participation Guidelines You are expected to participate actively in the scheduled online analytical discussions. In order to do this, you must create a substantive post for each of the four (4) assigned discussion topics by the deadline. Each post should demonstrate your achievement of the participation criteria. In addition, you should respond to the postings of at least two of your fellow learners for each discussion question (unless the discussion instructions state otherwise). These responses to other learners should be substantive posts that contribute to the conversation by asking questions, respectfully debating positions, and presenting supporting information relevant to the topic. Also, it is your responsibility to respond to any follow-up questions the instructor directs to you in the Discussion area of Blackboard in a timely matter (within 24 hours). In order to permit other learners time to respond, you must submit your initial posts in the Discussion area by Tuesday at 23:55 (11:55 pm EDT) (just before midnight). Responses to other learners posts are due by the following Friday (last day of each segment) at 23:55 EDT. Timeline for Analytical Discussion Posts Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Weekly Discussion Schedule Segment Begins Read, reflect, research, and write Initial Discussion Post due Engage and respond with classmates ALL Responses DUE Segment Ends Online Analytical Discussion Scoring Rubric Due Date: Weeks one, two, four, and six Percentage of Course Grade: 30\% {see next page} Saturday 2 PHRE 5345 Online Analytical Discussion Grading Rubric Proficient (2 points) Distinguished (3 points) Learner does not post Learner responds to fewer responses to fellow learners. than the minimum number of request posts to fellow learners. Learner responds to the requisite number of posts to fellow learners and sometimes posts more than the requirements. Learner consistently responds to more than the requisite number of posts to fellow learners. Quality in Completeness: Responses address all aspects of the question. Responses do not address the Responses do not question or are not relevant consistently address all to the discussion prompts. aspects of the question. Responses address all aspects of the question. Responses address all aspects of the question and extend the dialog. 3 Quality in Critical Thinking: Responses show evidence of critical thinking. Responses do not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking. Responses show evidence of critical thinking. Responses show evidence of critical thinking at a high level. 4 Quality in Peer-to-Peer Interaction: Responses to other learners include substantive feedback that extends the discussion by raising questions and sharing additional resource information when appropriate. Learner often responds to feedback received from other learners, as appropriate. Learner rarely or never posts Responses to other feedback to other learners. learners seldom include substantive feedback that extends the discussion. Learner occasionally responds to feedback received from other learners. Responses to other learners include substantive feedback that extends the discussion by raising questions and sharing additional resource information, when appropriate. Learner often responds to feedback received from other learners, as appropriate. Responses to other learners are insightful and provide substantive feedback that extends the discussion by consistently raising new questions, fosters critical thinking, and leads to the refinement of ideas. Learner responds to feedback received from other learners, as appropriate, and continues the dialog. 5 Quality in Use of Discussion Guidelines (in syllabus): Responses show evidence of analysis and synthesis to create a strong, substantive post that states the case and supports the evaluation with evidence as needed. Responses do not follow any Responses show minimal of the discussion guidelines. analysis and synthesis to create a strong post that partially states the case and contains minimal evidence. Responses show evidence of analysis and synthesis to create a strong, substantive post that states the case and supports the evaluation with evidence. Responses show evidence of analysis and synthesis to create a strong, substantive discussion post that states the full case, supports the evaluation with evidence, and raises new questions or describes what remains unanswered. # Criterion 1 Participation Responsiveness: Learner responds to the requisite number of posts to fellow learners and sometimes posts more than the requirements. 2 Non-performance (0 points) Basic (1 point) Responses show minimal evidence of critical thinking. TOTAL => 15 Points ... Purchase answer to see full attachment