Fluent Essays

International Human Resource Management.Chosen Country for the work is Zambia.4000 words assignment.Needed by Thursdays 28th May 2020. shen_1.docx shen_2.docx shen_3.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATION Module title: Module code: Assignment title: Module tutor name(s): Assessment set by: (if not the module tutor) Academic year: \% Weighting (to overall module): Average study time required by student: Date of hand out to students: Mechanism to be used to disseminate to students: Date and time of submission by student: People Management in Global Organisations LD7168 Comparing and contrasting International Management of Project Teams Diane Ellison 2019/20 100\% 200 hours TBC Instructions and guidance issued via eLP Module Site (Assessment Area). TBC . Turnitin submission using the upload link for Final Submission, which will be provided on the Assessment page of the LD eLP Blackboard module site. The front cover of the final submission is to only contain, and clearly identify (in this order, on separate lines): the module code and name; the student number; the word count; the total number of all figures and tables. No later than 20 working days after the submission Date by which work, feedback and marks will be returned to students: date. These marks will be issued via Blackboard. Mechanism(s) for return of assignmentwork, feedback and marks to students: Via Turnitin. Mechanism for submission of work by student: Assignment Brief: The objective of these assignments is to undertake an extensive range of secondary research to review both the importance of the people element and the development and benefits of team development in project management with an emphasis on psychology, social sciences and organisational behaviour. Formative Assessment: 15 minute in-class presentation. Either individually or in self-selected and self-managed groups of up to three people select one country (other than the UK) and present research into their culture, legislation, organisational structure and governance. The assessment will be presented in week 11 and will contribute to the Module Learning Outcomes listed below. Detailed guidance will be provided. Summative Assessment: Individual written assignment of 4000 words. From the results of the formative assessment and additional secondary research you will then individually address, critically evaluate and compare/contrast people management of the UK and your chosen country; addressing the three main aims of this assignment: • • • Firstly, select, critically review and reflect upon key theories, models and tools associated with individuals, groups, teams, management and leadership in international project-orientated contexts. Secondly, to consider how self-awareness and sensitivity to the psychological, social and cultural factors may influence behaviour of self and others in project teams within an international focus. Lastly, to critically evaluate a range of options available to improve team work in projects and to provide recommendations to improve team dynamics, trust and associated success in international projects. Delivery: academaically written, with appropriate in-text citations and supporting references an assignment of 4,000 words. To include a 200 word abstract (not included in the word count),introduction, critical review of theoretical elements, comparison of governernance, organisational structures, cultures and team building from two countries. The assingment will be submitted and assessed electronically and addresses Module Learning Outcomes listed below. Additional instructions to students: Throughout the Module there are discussions on aspects of international people management. In order to further equip you with topic specific knowledge and understanding, and help you develop your intellectual skills and abilities in this subject, you will expect that some elements in your paper will be informed by material issued by credible, relevant, professional institutes within Project Management (e.g. https://www.apm.org.uk/, http://www.ipma.world/, https://www.pmi.org/) as these organisations will be useful in highlighting current issues and offering supporting information. It is envisaged that by undertaking such independent preliminary research, this may act as a prelude, generating future research interest which could be further developed individually, or in collaboration with peers or academic staff at the end of the module. The paper is to be properly structured and supported through ‘academic’ research using appropriate and quality references which are cited correctly throughout. It is to conclude with an effective summary recording what is now ‘known’ in these selected areas. A separate references list must also be provided at the end of the document. Further Information Learning outcomes from the Module Descriptor/Specification: • • Define and evaluate selected key theories and concepts associated with the main characteristics, models and processes of International People Management. Critically evaluate selected key theories and techniques associated organization, organisational structures and management processes in relation to International People Management. Intellectual / Professional Skills & Abilities: • • Empowered with the knowledge, skills and abilities to create, participate in and effectively lead real and virtual project-orientated teams. Critically review the literature on strategic management and engage with what others have written through evaluative discourse. Personal Values Attributes (Global / Cultural awareness, Ethics, Curiosity) (PVA) • Exhibit the professional ethics characteristics of a Northumbria University postgraduate student. You will have the opportunity to reflect on how these are related to your own values and thus review your personal professional development plan. Assessment criteria / marking scheme: Abrstract: 200 word summary of the report (not included in total word count). 5\% • Introduction: This will contextualise the topic of people management in a global organisation and positions the importance of people management in project teams. As well as concisely summarising and comparing global people management in order to justify the selection and importance of the chosen topic areas in the main subject matter. 5\% • Relationship with existing literature: The paper should demonstrate a critical evaluation and review of the key theories, models and literature in the field, citing an appropriate range of literature from recognised academic sources. 25\% • Critical and evaluative self-reflection: Consideration of self-awareness and understanding of psychological, social and cultural factors which influence behaviours in an international project team. 25\% • Consideration and evaluation of options. Criticacally evaluate the options generated and make recommendations to improve effectiveness of an international project team. 25\% • Communication and presentation: Attention should be paid to the clarity of expression and readability, including general structure and use of appropriate language and style for a professiona report. Care should be taken not to use inappropriate jargons or acronyms. 10\% General structure, formatting of the work and the references section (see below notes) in particular. 5\% • Referencing style: • For this task, full academic referencing from any sources used is to be provided in the references section at the end of the assignment using the Harvard referencing style, where correct and working hyperlinks to the original source should also be created to allow the tutor to check these sources. • In-text referencing should also be undertaken using the Harvard referencing style. • The referencing technique for the Harvard Referencing style must follow the contained within either the “Cite them Right” publication (Pears and from http://www.citethemrightonline.com/ . Both of these resources provide information about correct referencing technique and standards. In other words, traceable to the sources used. • Further assistance with academic reading, writing and referencing is available via Northumbria Universities Skills Plus web page. appropriate guidance Shields, 2008), or consistent help and everything should be Expected size of the submission: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/arpdf/WordLimitsPolicyv2-2016 • The work should be formatted using ‘Arial’ font, of font size ‘11’, with 1.5 line spacing. • The work shall be a maximum of 4000 words (which excludes the references/bibliography section). Plus 200 word abstract. • Figures (diagrams, illustrations, photographs etc.) and tables are welcome to support the text, but must be fully incorporated into the submission, integrated and following the text that fully explains why they are exhibited. 200 words will be counted for each separate figure/table used. • The work must form a structured and coherent whole. No contents page or superfluous front matter is required. Only a basic front sheet for the submission is to be provided, that identifies the student number (not name), the total number of words used (excluding references section), and the number of figures/tables used. • Footnotes/’Endnotes’ will be permitted, as they can offer sufficient value, providing, their use is minimal, sufficiently concise, and appropriate - they offer only clarifying information, or add adjacent value to the sentences already written. In other words, they are not to be used to hide words that would otherwise normally be expected to be contained within the main body of the text, and their use will be considered in accordance with the University policy regarding word limits. The table below sets out the Universities policy regarding word limits: Under the word limit No Penalty: In not making use of the full word count, students may have self-penalised their work. If students have been able to achieve the requirements of the assessment using fewer words than allocated, they will not be penalised. Up to 10\% over the word limit No Penalty: Situation flagged by tutor in feedback but over-run is tolerated and no deduction is made from the final mark. More than 10\% over the word limit The marker will stop reading when they judge that the word count exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10\% i.e. for a 3000 word essay, the marker will read only the first 3300 words and will indicate on the text where they stop reading. The content following this point will not be read and a mark will be awarded only for the content up to this point. The full word limit policy is accessible here: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/university-services/academicregistry/quality-and-teaching-excellence/assessment/guidance-for-students/ Academic integrity statement: You must adhere to the university regulations on academic conduct. Formal inquiry proceedings will be instigated if there is any suspicion of plagiarism or any other form of misconduct in your work. Refer to the University’s Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards if you are unclear as to the meaning of these terms. The latest copy is available on the University website. https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/central/ar/qualitysupport/asspolicies/ Failure to submit: The University requires all students to submit assessed coursework by the deadline stated in the assessment brief. Where coursework is submitted without approval after the published hand-in deadline, penalties will be applied as defined in the University Policy on the Late Submission of Work. https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/arpdf/lateappr Group Work: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/arpdf/aq/groupworkpolicy Academic Misconduct Policy: http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/worddocuments/ardocs/2124927/academicmisconductprocedure Academic Registry Policy Home Page: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/central/ar/qualitysupport/asspolicies/ Anonymous marking: University policy requires that work be marked anonymously. In order to facilitate this, we request that only your student number is included on work submitted for summative assessment. Feedback from Lecture about I told him am choosing Zambia as a country for my work It’s about international human resource management and review whether or not it would be feasible for the UK approach to human resource management to be used in Zambia thats the bottom line. is it transferable to Zambia and guessing maybe it’s probably not but you need to find evidence to tell me yay or nay? if you think about yourself as providing the way a paper for the senior board of a company and company, the relevant doesnt have to be with the company but look vice as to whether or not what approach would be recommended between the UK at the Zambia. you need to look at some of the theories such as the difference in cultural differences so hofsted you need to look at the difference in the IHRM international human resource management options such as parent company host country third country which model could be used such as rooster was shen and has globalisation has an impact on the flexibility of the world markets, its quite range of topics but to give you a good review of the possibility and you then need to say right will we are setting up Zambia, we need to build a multinational multicultural project team and hows the best way for doing that. So, its a big triangle inverted. Look at the differences and general information youve collected on Zambia coming right down to what your recommendations are for future compliance. People Management in Global Organisations: Assignment Advice Firstly, there is no correct or incorrect way to approaching this piece of work, also the structure is your decision. You can adopt either a report style, using headings to separate the various parts, write it as one continuous essay style or make up a very short case study of a MNE (multi-national company) planning to expand to one or more countries away from the home base. What is important is that you address each section. Consider the word count and allocate accordingly. Would suggest you start by completing a mind map of the key areas. Consider the key words, theories, models and tools covered in the module and undertake a critical literature review of their effectiveness or not. Title: Then decide what you are addressing. This could be a rhetorical question such as ‘Should International Human Resource Management (IHRM) be modified to match the host country?’ Or ‘Alternative approaches to managing staff in Company ABC expanding to country XYZ’ Main body: Would start with a description and an analysis of the situation of the two counties in question using tools such as Hofstede, Lewis, GLOBE and perhaps some of the headline differences found in your country analyses and comparisons. You then need to review the range of IHRM options such as parent-company national, host-country national, third-country national choices; the various models such as Brewster’s European model (1995) and Shen’s 2005 Integrative IHRM framework; globalisation, integration or dominance approach theories; choice of a range of delivery models and tools covered and consider their impact on people management and expansion into your second chosen country adding in any relevant evidence. 1000 words Then move into a more insightful second section and the issues with project team development. You may wish to consider some of the following: What factors of project team building are important? Does knowledge and application of the various Belbin team roles have an impact? How will the team develop through the various stages? How will any conflict be dealt with? Does the issue of diversity and inclusion affect the team development? What are the choices and impact of management and leadership styles? What are the communication preferences, especially when dealing with virtual teams? Are there any ethical, employment or regulation issues? 1000 words Finally, based on your review consider what options are available for selecting the most effective approach to IHRM in these circumstances and recommendations for improving areas such as people management; teamwork; team dynamics; trust; team success and performance on projects in the UK and your chosen country. 1000 words There is no one way to write this section – it could be a debate, or it could result in a proposed solution to the project. The idea is to critically evaluate the theories and models and review and then apply what you have learnt that will help the project’s success (or not). Conclusion: summarise your research and aim to answer your title. 500 words Reference list Introduction PEOPLE MANAGEMENT IN A GLOBAL ORGANIZATION Individuals (stakeholders) Project management literature has developed a variety of techniques for project stakeholder management (PSM). At their core, these techniques aim to identify the individuals, groups, and organizations that “have a stake” in the project, to understand their specific interests, and to develop strategies for engaging with them to increase project success (Project Management Institute, 2017). The basic premise of PSM is that projects will run more smoothly and be more successful if stakeholders understand and agree with the project approaches and outcomes (Ackermann & Eden, 2011). If no such understanding is achieved, projects can experience delays and cost overruns, or may even be terminated (Aaltonen & Kujala, 2016; A project includes a planned series of interrelated activities to be performed over a fixed period. Each project consists of some amount of formal documentation, the output, and some positive and negative impacts (Mesly, 2017). Projects often comprise of people and organizations from different nationalities and disciplines such as architects, engineers, clients, contractors, suppliers, and banks which generates complexity in the managerial procedures, due to different multidisciplinary approaches inside multicultural teams, foreign managers, and international partners. People are an organizations greatest asset (Bradley and McDonald, 2011). Group There is confusion between the use of the words team and group, and it is important to note that though a team is or can be a group, a group is not necessarily a team. The difference between these two may be seen in the definitions of these two, too often used interchangeably in our daily discussions. A group is a collection of individuals (two or more) who are connected to each other by social relationships who interact with each other and share similar traits and characteristics (Platow, Grace and Smithson, 2012:5-13). Collectively they have a sense of unity amongst themselves and show a great degree of interdependence (Forsyth, 2009), and these need to identify themselves as members of the group. Groups have some degree of social cohesion that goes beyond a mere collection of individuals who have come together. Seven people who do not know each other meeting at pay-point to pay their bills may not be correctly referred to as a group Teams It is easy to see that different disciplines can influence a variety of project management issues such as: teams, leadership communication, performance, risk assessment business negotiations, international project management and planning (de Bony, 2010; Zwikael & Ahn, 2011). Multinational organizations (MNOs) are replete with integrative challenges, as geographically dispersed employees engage in global work, collaborating across different political, economic, societal, and cultural contexts. In response to those challenges, many firms deploy global teams, defined as bounded structures, formally recognized by the organization as teams, with members who work across national boundaries, and who are collectively accountable for outputs across locations (Hinds, Liu & Lyon, 2011).The lion’s share of innovative work is executed by teams. When it comes to staffing these teams, assigning an adequate number ... Purchase answer to see full attachment