Fluent Essays

Scenario and ActivityYou have been appointed as a junior strategy manager at a company of your choice* and have will be part of the team that will assess the company’s strategic position, as part of efforts to complete the company’s strategic plan.*You are advised to discuss your choice with your tutorYour taskProduce a report that includes the following: A discussion of the company’s mission statement, vison statement and statement of values; An analysis of the macro environment within which the company operates; An analysis of the industry within which the organization operate; Conclusions and recommendations on the assessment of the company’s strategic position derived from the analyses above. economics_for_business.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview Module title: Economics for Business Term 3 - Online delivery Learning outcome covered 3 Type of Submission Report Word Count 1,800 words Scenario and Activity You have been appointed as a junior strategy manager at a company of your choice* and have will be part of the team that will assess the company’s strategic position, as part of efforts to complete the company’s strategic plan. *You are advised to discuss your choice with your tutor Your task Produce a report that includes the following: • A discussion of the company’s mission statement, vison statement and statement of values; • An analysis of the macro environment within which the company operates; • An analysis of the industry within which the organization operate; • Conclusions and recommendations on the assessment of the company’s strategic position derived from the analyses above. Section/ element Allocated Marks Knowledge and understanding 25\% Application of concepts and principles to task 25\% Critical analysis 25\% Effectiveness of communication 25\% Page 2 of 5 85100\% Knowledge and Understanding Application of Concepts & Principles to task Critical Analysis Effectiveness of Communication An exceptionally comprehensive, detailed, profound grasp of key concepts at this level. The purpose of the task has been fully understood. Argument is developed logically and skilfully. Is critical, imaginative and insightful. Written communication is excellent. The work is extremely fluent. It is wellstructured and accurate. The work shows excellence in bringing together evidence in support of argument. A very sophisticated grasp of appropriate subject specific terminology. Very few, if any, language errors. A large quantity of accurate, factual, historical and contextual detail. An excellent answer that is thorough, complete, comprehensive & relevant. Conceptual knowledge applied with consummate skill. Excellent Extensive relevant, authoritative independent reading. 7084\% A comprehensive, detailed grasp of key concepts at this level. The purpose of the task has been fully understood. Argument is developed logically and shows excellent critical insight. Factual, historical and contextual detail is abundant and accurate. An excellent answer that is relevant, thorough and comprehensive Brings together evidence in support of argument. Referencing is faultless. Written communication is highly successful. The work is very fluent, well-structured and accurate, -very good grasp of appropriate subject specific terminology. Occasional language errors but they do not impede communication. Conceptual knowledge applied with considerable skill Significant, relevant, authoritative independent reading. Referencing is generally correct. Page 3 of 5 Very Good A very good knowledge and understanding of key concepts at this level. 6069\% Factual, historical and/or contextual information is evidenced where appropriate and is largely accurate. A very good answer that is relevant, thorough and complete. Argument is developed logically -a very good level of critical thinking. The purpose of the task has been fully understood. Brings together evidence in support of argument. Conceptual knowledge applied very skilfully. Some useful, relevant and authoritative independent reading. Written communication is very successful. The work is largely fluent and well-structured, accurate. A sound grasp of appropriate subject specific terminology. Errors occasional and only when complex ideas are discussed. Referencing contains few errors. A good knowledge and understanding The task has been understood and addressed competently. Good of key concepts but there may be gaps. 5059\% A fair knowledge and understanding of key concepts at this level but there may be significant gaps. Fair Some attempt at critical thinking is made but too descriptive. Answer may lack thoroughness and detail and contain some irrelevancy. A reasonable amount of factual, historical and/or contextual information, which contains few serious inaccuracies. 4049\% Argument sometimes lacks coherence. An attempted inclusion of factual, historical and/or contextual information, (likely to contain inaccuracies). Lacks coherence and application of evidence in support of argument. Communication is good. The work is reasonably fluent, well-structured and accurate. Some grasp of appropriate subjectspecific terminology. Error is evident but does not impede understanding of the main points. Conceptual knowledge applied with adequate skill. The question has been addressed simplistically and the purpose of the task may not have been fully understood. May be incomplete and contain irrelevancy. Application of conceptual knowledge is only partly successful. Lacks evidence of independent reading. Referencing may contain error. Limited evidence of logical argument or critical thinking. -seldom brings together evidence in support of argument. Written communication is only partly successful. Lacks precision. Research minimal and/or of questionable relevance & authority. The work is moderately fluent &shows a basic grasp of appropriate terminology. Significant errors in grammar, syntax and terminology in several places. Referencing may contain significant error. Page 4 of 5 Fail Weak or very limited understanding of key concepts at this level with very significant gaps. 039\% Factual, historical and/or contextual information is limited or very limited and/or inaccurate. The answer given is poor and/or incomplete. The main purpose of the task may be/is misunderstood and so the answer lacks relevance to the question, answer is incomplete and/or irrelevant. Any attempt to apply conceptual knowledge is very limited/does not exist. Argument, critical thinking and research are largely limited or absent. Any referencing conventions if extant are applied incorrectly. Written communication is not successful. The work lacks fluency and precision. A poor grasp of appropriate terminology. Frequent errors in grammar, syntax and terminology seriously impede understanding. Reader may be unable to follow the report. Any referencing highly erroneous. Page 5 of 5 ... Purchase answer to see full attachment