Fluent Essays

As the new communications manager for International Gadgets, you have come across many examples of ineffective communications, including some older directives that were never carried out, mostly because of their unclear nature.One example included an email stating that the recipient (within the R&D team) was to create a presentation discussing the new product and send it to interested departments. Others included a request from Sales to Technical Support for a list of the biggest problems with our hot products and a memo from Finance to all departments to reduce the number of suppliers being used to better control costs.In a memo to your team, describe what is wrong with directives such as these and how to improve these messages so that they are delivered to the recipient with clarity and conciseness.Please remember to refer to the Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubricdocument for company background.For additional details, please refer to the Module Six Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric document. it_520_module_one_short_paper_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf it_520_module_six_short_paper_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview IT 520 Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric This course includes five short business memos. These are designed to actively test your understanding and to apply that knowledge to potential real-world situations. These writing activities also provide practice in communicating your reasoning in a professional manner. Prompt: Team Building and Collaboration (Module One) International Gadgets is a company with offices throughout the United States and in Europe. There has been a history of miscommunication within office departments, between offices, and, most importantly, between the company and its wide customer base. You have been hired as a manager in the newly created communications department. The purpose of your position is to improve these problematic channels of communications. Company Background International Gadgets (IG) is a multinational company of 1,300+ employees and over $4 billion in revenue. Headquartered in Manchester, New Hampshire, the company designs, manufactures, sells, and supports a variety of low- and high-tech business productivity tools. IG has manufacturing facilities in Detroit, Michigan, and Shanghai, China, and sources component parts from suppliers in Vietnam, China, Brazil, and the United States. While IG maintains sales offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Munich, Paris, Moscow, and Brussels, its products are sold throughout the United States and all of Europe and in China through a partner firm. IG employs both a direct sales force targeting its top 1,000 customers as well as selling via its website. Sales offices also include service and support operations, managed separately from the sales teams. The company is considering expanding more directly into China and exploring the possibility of opening a sales office in Beijing. IG’s current top-selling product is the OfficeDrone, designed for workplace monitoring. The OfficeDrone is a small unmanned aerial vehicle for indoor use that includes real-time video monitoring and a targetable built-in water pistol and reservoir. The OfficeDrone is marketed to management and security teams to break up water cooler conversations and other non-productive behaviors among groups of workers. IG has introduced several new products and experienced rapid growth during the past year with many new employees in all departments. The management team has greatly expanded as well, including several first-time managers, and is experiencing difficulties in functioning as effectively as in the past. Communications within and between all parts of the organization, external partners, and suppliers and customers, are at serious risk of completely breaking down. In a recent example, Detroit Manufacturing was unable to meet a product delivery deadline because of parts shortages from supplies. (The component parts originated in Brazil and had been seriously delayed due to a dockworker’s strike at U.S. West Coast ports.) Manufacturing believed they had informed Sales of the delay, but Sales indicated they had never received that information and ended up losing the customer to a competitor. In another example, European sales were impacted when Switzerland unexpectedly devalued its currency, impacting IG’s profitability. Revised profitability forecasts were provided by several of the European sales offices, but others did not understand the request from the corporate office due to how it was worded, and the delay in response led to unnecessary costs. Your first task is to hire a small team to address these issues. Write a memo to management describing the makeup and roles of your proposed team, what attributes you will be looking for in team members, and what you hope to accomplish with your new team. Be sure to offer solid reasoning in all areas of your memo. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Review the Purdue Owl: Memo website for suggestions and formatting guidelines on memo structure. Critical Elements Description of Business Case Recommendations Conclusions Articulation of Response Exemplary (100\%) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and ideas are substantiated with specific and relevant details Meets “Proficient” criteria with substantial detail for the rationale Meets “Proficient” criteria, and conclusions are substantiated with specific and relevant research Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread format Proficient (90\%) Accurately describes the business case and uses specific details in explanation Needs Improvement (70\%) Accurately describes the business case, but lacks specific details in explanation Not Evident (0\%) Does not accurately describe the business Value 30 Provides a discussion highlighting the recommendations, with sufficient detail for rationale Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence Provides a discussion highlighting the recommendations, but lacks sufficient detail for rationale Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence Does not provide a discussion highlighting the recommendations 30 Does not draw logical conclusions 30 Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100\% IT 520 Module Six Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric This course includes five short business memos. These are designed to actively test your understanding and to apply that knowledge to potential real-world situations. These writing activities also provide practice in communicating your reasoning in a professional manner. The Importance of Clarity and Conciseness (Module Six) As the new communications manager for International Gadgets, you have come across many examples of ineffective communications, including some older directives that were never carried out, mostly because of their unclear nature. One example included an email stating that the recipient (within the R&D team) was to “create a presentation discussing the new product and send it to interested departments.” Others included a request from Sales to Technical Support for “a list of the biggest problems with our hot products” and a memo from Finance to all departments to “reduce the number of suppliers being used to better control costs.” In a memo to your team, describe what is wrong with directives such as these and how to improve these messages so that they are delivered to the recipient with clarity and conciseness. Guidelines for Submission: Review the Purdue Owl: Memo website for suggestions and formatting guidelines on memo structure. Critical Elements Description of Directive Recommendations Conclusions Articulation of Response Exemplary (100\%) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and ideas are substantiated with specific and relevant details Meets “Proficient” criteria with substantial detail for the rationale Meets “Proficient” criteria, and conclusions are substantiated with specific and relevant research Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread format Proficient (90\%) Accurately describes areas of the directive that lack clarity and conciseness and uses specific detail in explanation Provides a discussion highlighting the recommendations with sufficient detail for rationale Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence Needs Improvement (70\%) Accurately describes areas of the directive that lack clarity and conciseness, but lacks specific details in explanation Provides a discussion highlighting the recommendations, but lacks sufficient detail for rationale Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence Not Evident (0\%) Does not describe the directive Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Value 30 Does not provide a discussion highlighting the recommendations 30 Does not draw logical conclusions 30 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100\% ... Purchase answer to see full attachment