Fluent Essays

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.PICOT Question Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).Research CritiquesIn the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.Refer to Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines - Final Draft. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.Proposed Evidence-Based Practice ChangeDiscuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.General RequirementsPrepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. nrs_433v_rs5_researchcritiquepicotguidelines.docx rubric_print_format.xlsx rubric_print_format_2.xlsx Unformatted Attachment Preview Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft Use this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft. Quantitative and Quantitative Studies Background 1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question. How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose? 1. Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question. 2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question. Method of Study: 1. State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different. 2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method. Results of Study 1. Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary. 2. What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice? Ethical Considerations 1. Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research. 2. Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research. Outcomes Comparison 1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question? 2. How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes? © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-OL191 Criteria Content Percentage 80.0\% Summary of Clinical Issue 5.0\% PICOT Question 10.0\% APA-Formatted Article Citations With Permalinks 5.0\% Relationship of Articles to the PICOT Question 10.0\% Quantitative and Qualitative Articles 10.0\% Purpose Statements 5.0\% Research Questions 5.0\% Outcome 5.0\% Setting 5.0\% Sample 5.0\% Method 5.0\% Key Findings of the Study 5.0\% Recommendations of the Researcher 5.0\% Organization and Effectiveness 10.0\% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0\% Format 10.0\% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0\% Total Weightage 100\% Assignment Title PICOT Question and Literature Search 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00\%) A clinical issue is omitted or is not relevant to nursing practice. A PICOT question is not included. Article citations and permalinks are omitted. Three or more articles do not relate to the PICOT question. Fewer than six research articles are presented. Four or more articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, Purpose statements are omitted or are incomplete overall. Research questions are omitted or are incomplete overall. Research outcomes are omitted or are incomplete overall. The setting is omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. The sample is omitted for one or more of the articles. The sample described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Sources are not documented. Total Points 120.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00\%) A clinical issue is partially presented. It is unclear how the clinical issue relates to nursing practice. Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies. A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The PICOT question format is used incorrectly. Article citations and permalinks are presented. There are significant errors in the APA format. One or more links do not lead to the intended article. At least two articles do not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide a small degree of support for the PICOT question. Different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question. Six research articles are presented. Three articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative Purpose statements are referenced but are incomplete in some areas. Research question is presented for each article. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research question for several of the articles. Research outcome is presented for each article. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for several of the articles. The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for at least two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. The method of study is partially presented for each article. Key information is consistently omitted. Overall, the methods reported contain inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00\%) A clinical issue is summarized. The issue generally relates to nursing practice. A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is generally applied. Some information or revision is needed. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format, but there are errors. At least one articles does not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide general support for the PICOT question. One or two different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question. Six research articles are presented. Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. Some ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated. Purpose statements are presented. There are minor omissions in some areas, or major inaccuracies. Research questions are presented. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research question for one or two articles. Research outcomes are presented. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for one or two articles. The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. The method of study for each article is presented. Some key aspects are missing for one or two articles, or there are some inaccuracies for the methods reported. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented for each article. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00\%) A clinical issue is presented. The issue relates to nursing practice. Minor detail is needed for clarity. A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is applied accurately. Some detail is need for support or clarity. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format. There are minor errors. Each article relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide support for the PICOT question. Six research articles are presented. One article does not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. A general ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated. Purpose statements summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies in some. Research questions are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas. Research outcomes are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas. The setting is indicated for each article. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the physical, social, or cultural site in which the researcher conducted the study. The sample is indicated for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00\%) Comments A clinical issue is thoroughly described. The issue relates to nursing practice. I think everyone know you should wash hands...what will you do about hand hygiene? Will you give a workshop on the A PICOT question is clearly presented. The PICOT question importance of hand hygiene, create a format is applied accurately and presents an answerable and policy procedure? You also need a researchable question. comparison. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurately presented in APA format. At least two of the permalinks do not work and one is more than five years old. This was difficult to determine. All had to Each article clearly relates to the PICOT question. The articles do with readmission after surgery but, not provide strong support for the PICOT question. all were directly related to hand hygiene. Article 1 and six are not qualitative research. The surveys are converted to Six research articles are presented. Each article meets the numbers and statistical analysis is used. assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed Article two does not appear to be actual study. An ability to identify the different types of research research but, a review of prevention design used in a study is consistently demonstrated. methods. Purpose statements are accurate and clearly summarized. Research questions are accurate and capture the fundamental question posed by the researchers in each study. You have not included this information. Research outcomes are accurate and described in detail for each article. The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and accurate for each article. Some of the information is given for some of the articles. The sample is indicated and accurate for each article. Some of this information was not given for each article. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article You need more information than just is presented. survey Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with relevant details and extensive explanation. Researcher recommendations accurate are thoroughly described for each article. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Should have used the graph provided and answered all questions for each article in one block Points Earned 6.00/6.00 9.96/12.00 4.98/6.00 9.96/12.00 9.00/12.00 6.00/6.00 4.50/6.00 6.00/6.00 4.98/6.00 4.98/6.00 4.98/6.00 5.64/6.00 5.64/6.00 9.00/12.00 11.28/12.00 102.90/120.0 Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-OL191 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0\% Qualitative Studies 5.0\% Background of Study 10.0\% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0\% Method of Study 15.0\% Results of Study 15.0\% Ethical Considerations 15.0\% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0\% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0\% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0\% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0\% Format 10.0\% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0\% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0\% Total Weightage 100\% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00\%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00\%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00\%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00\%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of ... Purchase answer to see full attachment