Fluent Essays

This is a 2 part Assignment. 700 words and a power point INSTRUCTIONS ARE ATTACHED Indiana Tech College of Professional Studies CJ 4960 Senior Capstone: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems Online Syllabus Course Content Instructor Information Please see Professor Profile at the Blackboard instructional site. Course Schedule Please see Course Schedule in the Course Syllabus area of the Blackboard instructional site. Online Course Policies All of the online courses taken by students are required to follow the policies posted online at http://online.indianatech.edu/tech-policies/policies/. Please review the posted policies carefully. If you are unable to abide by the policies listed, please contact the Warrior Information Network (WIN) at 888.832.4742 and request to withdraw from this course. Textbook Reichel, P. L. (2013). Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Grading Events & Grading Criteria Unless otherwise specified, all assignments must be submitted via Blackboard Course Preparation Quiz 15 Points Discussion Board (Week 1, 2, 4) 100 Points Project One (Law Enforcement) 150 Points Project Two (Criminal Law) 150 Points Exam One 100 Points Exam Two 100 Points Tech Live Weekly Reflections 60 points Total Points 675 Points Class Participation/Discussion: Students are expected to have read the assigned materials prior to the weekly module and be able to intelligently respond to questions about and discuss the readings. Points will be based on the following criteria: 1. Response to the posted question/topic within the week of the module keeping in mind that more than opinion is being solicited. Support your opinions/arguments utilizing course material and/or other relevant and academically oriented sources. 2. Response to at least two other students’ posts which is designed to foster interaction as well as designed to challenge one another to potentially look at topics or arguments from a differing viewpoint. Keep in mind the intent is not to cause argument but rather to challenge thinking. Students are encouraged to raise issues and ask questions regarding current or outside the classroom events that are related to the course. A student MUST have full participation with responding to all of the posted questions/topics for each module as well as a minimum of at least two responses to other students’ posts in order to attain the full one hundred (100) points for class participation. http://online.indianatech.edu/tech-policies/policies/ Projects (2): Students are required to write two (2) papers describing (2) major components of foreign country of the students choosing (instructor must approve selection). The assignments will require the student to research, write a paper, and make a presentation, by means of developing a PowerPoint presentation covering the material presented in the formal paper describing (1) Police/Law Enforcement of a foreign country and (2) The Criminal Law Components of a foreign country. The specific topics and grading criteria for the written assignments and presentation follow and are incorporated into this syllabus. Written assignments are to be word processed using Microsoft Word, size 12 New Times Roman font, double spaced with one (1) inch margins around the page (default), using the American Psychological Association (APA) citation method. Your research papers and presentations should be thorough and scholarly. Jargon, lingo, and street language are to be avoided and their use will decrease your grade. By way of example, and not limitation, “cop” is generally unacceptable, “police officer” or “law enforcement officers” is preferred. A person may be “mentally ill” or “legally insane” (they are not the same), not “nuts” or “crazy”. The material expected to be covered in each written project is covered toward the end of this syllabus. Keep in mind, the paper should be written as such. In other words, based off the material list pertaining to information that should be covered, make the information into a paper—do not simply bullet point answers. Further, ensure that you are crediting the source(s) used for the information that you are referencing by utilizing the proper APA format. The written paper must be submitted prior to the date/time due, as noted in the course schedule, and submitted via Blackboard’s SafeAssign feature. The PowerPoint portion of the assignment must be submitted via an electronic mail (email) attachment prior to the due date/time or utilizing the submit feature within the respective module under the assignment section. If the student runs into problems submitting the email due to size of the attachment, “note pages” of the presentation would be perfectly acceptable. If questions arise in regard to how to do so, in advance, ensure that you get with the instructor to work through PowerPoint to “print” the note pages if necessary. Information to Cover for Projects: PROJECT ONE: POLICE/LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF STRUCTURE NUMBER OF AGENCIES IN THE COUNTRY OFFICERS PER 1000 POPULATION ARMED OR UNARMED ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Centralized or decentralized National State or provincial Local JURISDICTIONAL STRUCTURE Overlapping Coordinated Uncoordinated OPERATIONS/DUTIES Proactive Reactive Investigative CRIME RATE CORRUPTION AND MISCONDUCT ISSUES LEVEL OF COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN AGENICES PROCEDURES, POLICIES, METHODS OR IDEAS THE U.S. SHOULD ADOPT: At least one (1) procedure, policy, or idea must be described that you feel the U.S. should adopt and explain why. PROCEDURES, POLICIES, METHODS OR IDEAS THE U.S. COULD NOT OR SHOULD NOT ADOPT: At least one (1) procedure, policy, or idea must be described that the U.S should not or could not adopt and explain why. PROJECT TWO: CRIMINAL LAW BACKGROUND OF COUNTRY Location on map Demographics Population Racial, ethnic, and/or religious population percentages Method by which sovereignty was attained ECONOMIC STRUCTURE Centralized Socialist Capitalist Mixed GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE Type of government Monarchy Dictatorship Republic Democratic Constitution Common Law Written Other Branches Executive Legislative Judicial Method of selecting officials in branches LEGAL TRADITION Common Civil Islamic Eastern Asia Combination SOURCE OF: Substantive Criminal Law Procedural Criminal Law DESCRIBE PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS PROJECT GRADING CRITERIA 150 points possible per project Grading areas for Paper Portion Length/Grammar 20 points possible Theoretical Sourcework 15 points possible Critical Thought 50 points possible Fits Parameters of Assignment 15 points possible Paper Portion: 100 Points Possible -Less than 700 words, poor grammatical usage, poor document construction 0-11 points -700+ words, many grammatical problems, moderate construction 12- 17 points -700+ words, few grammatical problems, good construction 18- 20 points -No theoretical component, insufficient cites, no bibliography/refere nce list, uses same citation repeatedly 0-5 points -Theoretical substance lacking, information referenced but not explained, mistakes with citations, references not clearly marked, some overlap of citations used 6-10 points -Well cited, thorough application of course content/theoretical components, well documented bibliography 11-15 points -No expansion of material/insight, does not relate own observations/experience to paper 0-15 points -Some expansion of material/insight, shows some understanding and application of course material, relates some experience/observations to paper 16-30 points -Expands material/insight to own experiences and observations, shows full understanding and application of course material, questions and confirms course material with own insight and support of other documentation 31-50 points -Assignment not followed/doe s not address topics as noted 0-5 points -Follows some aspects of assignment but does not fully address all topics 6- 10 points -Addresses all aspects of assignment and fully covers all topics 11-15 points PowerPoint Presentation 50 Points Possible -Student’s presentation is inconsistent, unclear or not cohesive failing to fully cover/address areas listed in requirements and doesn’t match material in paper 0-15 points -Presentation is fairly clear and cohesive while covering most but not all of the areas listed in requirements and somewhat matches material covered in paper 16-34 points -Presentation is well organized and fully covers all areas listed in requirements and matches material presented in paper 35-50 points Examinations: Examinations will consist of fifty (50) questions in a multiple choice, true/false, and fill-in the blank format. Each response has a value of two (2) points towards a student’s grade. Examinations must be completed by the date/time listed in the course syllabus and may have time restrictions. Grading Scale The following grading scale will be used to assign a grade at the end of the course: Late Assignments All assignments and required online activities are due according to the deadline listed in the course schedule. Granting deadline extension is the course instructor’s autonomy. Incompletes If you are unable to complete the requirements for this course due to extenuating circumstances, an Incomplete grade (I) may be granted if you meet the general guidelines stated below. General Guidelines for submitting a course incomplete request: • More than 50% of the course session has elapsed. • The student has encountered an unexpected situation that is beyond his or her control. • The student is o in good academic standing -- up to date on all of the course assignments and has at least an overall passing grade, o able to complete all of the remaining coursework within a session (6 weeks for undergraduate and graduate courses) that immediately follows the session the student is currently enrolled, and o able to provide support documentations to substantiate the need for extra time should a session is not enough to complete the course requirements. A 90-100% B 80-89.99% C 70-79.99% D 60-69.99% F 59.99% or below If an Incomplete is granted, the instructor will set a deadline for all work to be completed. The deadline cannot go past one (1) session. All incomplete grades and deadlines are subject to approval by the designated University authority. Course Related Communication Online courses are conducted in an accelerated format. Timely communication is very important. When receiving emails from your classmates or instructor, please respond as soon as you can. Students are REQUIRED to use their Indiana Tech email account for all course related communication. The most direct, and effective, way to email your course instructor, and classmates, is by using the Send Email function from the Blackboard course site. When you use the Send Email function, you automatically receive a carbon copy of the email you sent. In the event when you need to substantiate your claim that you did email your classmates or instructor, you can show that carbon copy to the person(s) who requested it. Please note that Blackboard only permits you to send email, it does not provide you with the check email function. All of the emails your classmates and instructor sent to you will be delivered to your Indiana Tech email account. You are strongly encouraged to check your Indiana Tech email account regularly, preferably several times a week, to minimize the likelihood of miscommunication. The University policy requires each online course instructor to respond to a student’s email within 24 hours. Unless there is an extraneous situation that prevents the instructor from following this rule, you can expect to hear from the instructor within 24 hours. If you don’t receive a reply within 24 hours, please do not hesitate to follow up with another email or forward the carbon copy of the email you sent to [email protected] with a note “Please help. It’s been 24 hours and I have not heard from my instructor” and the University support staff will act on your behalf to contact your course instructor. mailto:[email protected]