Fluent Essays

Find the attachment Respond to each post Use reliable and different reference from the original post Respond DO NOT summarize.Very important: you have to include your thoughts in a critical thinking APA style6 responses in totalAt least 150 words each week_2_posts_.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview 12345678- Find the attachment Respond to each post with a FULL Single-space paragraph A reliable reference for each paragraph Respond DO NOT summarize. Very important; you have to include your thoughts APA style 6 responses in total At least 150 words each Course: Healthcare Management The assignment was: 1. “How difficult is it to operationalize HICS? What are some of the challenges associated with HICS implementation? What are some solutions to the identified challenges? 2. Who needs to be trained in HICS and why? 3. Should different staff receive different levels of training?” Post#1 How difficult is it to operationalize HICS? What are some of the challenges associated with HICS implementation? What are some solutions to the identified challenges? Challenges Operationalizing HICS a bit challenging since hospital facilities rarely roll out staff training programs from day to day basis. The implication of this is that in the event of something happening at the hospital, inadequate relaying of messages resulting from not using a commonly discernable language as well as the least motivation for the staff makes it hard for HICS to apply in some areas. It also makes the team have difficulties in their flexibility (Jensen & Waugh, 2014). The same applies to them changing over to various HCIS models giving push back. This is because it is very different from what they are used to on their daily tasks. Solutions The basis for solving this problem is providing compulsory training to organizational employees regularly. For instance, it could be done quarterly (Jensen & Waugh, 2014). The aim of this is to ensure that they are kept abreast of the latest trends and skills so that they can know appropriate ways of responding to emergencies and disasters. Also, senior employees or administrators should regularly convene to do surveys as a way of understanding the junior employees take on the HCIS systems. Such an understanding could help them know the majority of the staff fully understand it as well as other relevant feelings. As a consequence, the number of staff that are frustrated with the systems may reduce. They could enhance their overall productivity as well. Who needs to be trained in HICS and why? To ensure that all the systems are functioning well, all employees across the organizational strata should be trained regarding the functioning of the system. This observation is derived from the fact that all staff in a hospital set up are considered equal. In an emergency, everyone around plays a vital role in helping out (Reilly & Markenson, 2010). Thus, all of them being familiar with how the systems operate, as well as the organizational strata, will be in a position to respond well. In case of emergency hits, all employees will be on a vantage position to help out, thus preventing the escalation of the emergency. Should different staff receive different levels of training? All employees in the organizational structure should be trained well because they will help out in case there is a disaster. Thus, the training is intended to ensure that every staff member knows their position and their expected reaction when an emergency hits their organization. Adequate training should be provided regularly to ensure that they are in a position to act. Post#2 The difficulty to operationalize HICS depends on the size of the medical facility as well as the facility’s turnover rate. For HICS to be implemented properly, all staff must be educated and trained. This can be difficult if there is a large number of hospital employees because to motivate them to take the trainings would require resources that may not be available, such as available time and money (Shooshtari et al., 2017). A possible solution would require FEMA IS trainings in HICS to be a part of qualifications for those who apply for jobs at the hospital. There is also the challenge of setting up a large enough mass casualty exercise that would engage the staff who would realistically participate in a real-life event -this would require an extensive amount of planning and funding (Reilly & Markenson, 2010). Another challenge would be finding a suitable employee to plan the exercise. If the hospital had a full-time emergency preparedness director then that would be the solution. However, many hospitals rather rely on hospital personnel to take time from their immediate position to do those duties. Finding the right employee to lead this exercise is an important facet of how effectively it impacts the organization, and how significantly it improves outcomes. All hospital personnel need to be trained in HICS because all hospital personnel will play some role in a disaster. The roles will vary in immediate need, but all are important. The emergency department will be impacted first and will be overwhelmed whereas the clinical laboratory or radiology may not be impacted as drastically, if at all (Reilly & Markenson, 2010). However, understanding the roles of everyone that will be involved will better illuminate the importance of hospital staff to focus on their roles. This is important as volunteers who want to help can overwhelm the HICS process if no one knows what roles those volunteers could positively impact. Hospital personnel should receive HICS training extensively to the roles that they will assume. While still receiving generalized HICS training to understand the overall process and roles that will be assumed by others, it is unnecessary for a nurse to be trained in how the clinical laboratory or human resources actions would be in a disaster. However, it is important for a nurse to understand how the clinical laboratory or human resources will be impacted as well as how they are trained to respond. Therefore, there is no confusion or assumption of who fulfills what roles and what actions would be taken. Course: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS The assignment was: “1. After reading the commission report on children in disasters, choose the most difficult topic to solve and identify why. 2. Having read the Commission report, describe the unique aspects that must be considered when doing emergency planning and response for children.” Post#1 The topic which is challenging to deal with is the evacuation of children during the disaster. This topic concentrates on trying to reunite children with their parents after the disaster is over. This process seems easy, but this is not always the case. When people are separated by a national emergency or a disaster affecting a large area, families tend to separate (Pfefferbaum, Pfefferbaum & Van Horn, 2018). In other instances, children are left behind. For example, in the case of disaster occurrence in a region, parents cannot go to school to rescue their children; instead, they will run for their life. In such a case, it is tough to trace their children or even their location. In the United States, the refugee camps are very many; this means that family members may flee to various camps. It becomes hard for children to rejoin with their children, and this present evacuation as one of the hardest topics to be addressed (Cutter, 2017). Therefore, this topic is challenging to solve, as it requires a lot of time, effort, and money. At times, it is usually impossible to reunite children with their family members more so if they cannot speak. One of the primary considerations that one must take into account while planning for disaster understands the needs of children. Unlike adults, children are susceptible to many harmful substances, which may be safe for adults (Delicado et al., 2017). In times of disaster, they are usually in great danger since when they come into contact with some substance, they may become sick following their fragile nature. Further, they can barely run in the time of the disaster; this makes them more prone to various risks. It is essential to consider the health status of children; there are those children who cannot see while others cannot walk. Such issues should be regarded as during disaster management planning. Post#2 1. After reading the commission report on children in disasters, choose the most difficult topic to solve and identify why. After reading the commission report on children in disaster, the most difficult topic to solve is the supply of emergency medical services and pediatric transport during disaster. First of all, this is difficult because it requires the participation of all states. Indeed, providing a global and effective response for children during disasters requiresa conjoint effort between all states because the limits and effects of a natural disasters can not be predicted ( US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020). The difficulty comes from the fact that all states must meet the criteria and expectations formulated in the report. it is challenging because, in the United States, the human, material, and financial resources differ from one state to another (Stein, 2017). As a result, achieving a global and uniform level of emergency medical services and pediatric transport throughout the united states requires the mobilization of important human and financial resources to support each state according to its needs. Providing emergency medical services and pediatric transport during disasters represents a problem difficult to solve in the United States because of the low level of preparedness that currently prevails in the American healthcare system. As mentioned by Savoia et al., (2018), the American healthcare system is not yet ready to deliver effective healthcare to children during disasters because the knowledge and means required for such interventions are insufficient in most states. 2- Having read the Commission report, describe the unique aspects that must be considered when doing emergency planning and response for children. When doing emergency planning and response for children, the first aspect to consider is the creation of an entity whose action will be to assess the level of preparedness of the organization. More specifically, this entity will be tasked with the mission to identify the gaps in the organization’s skills and material resources and to come up with strategies aimed at addressing them (Savoia et al., 2018). Once these strategies and plans are identified, the next task of this central entity is to coordinate the efforts of each sub-entity to make sure that progress is made in the right direction. Indeed, this key entity will have to review the actions of all sub-entities and provide assistance when need be (McDarby et al., 2019). Also, in doing emergency planning and response for children, it is important to make sure that the organization set is can effectively manage trauma. This requires the existence of a well-prepared task force that has the skills, knowledge, and materials necessary to assist children with trauma and other difficult medical conditions. Finally, emergency planning and response for children requires a follow-up on the condition of the children who have been admitted or treated (McDarby et al., 2019). This will allow the organization to review its performance after the disaster and take corrective actions to improve its performance. Course: Logistic Management for Disasters The assignment was: “In the Preposition NPS article (found in Course Documents), review the value of prepositioning disaster supplies ahead of a disaster. In each case presented, determine if the effort to move supplies made a significant impact on the success or failure of the event. Select one event and provide an example of an action that would have provided a better outcome for the disaster. Briefly explain how you came to that conclusion.” Post#1 Prepositioning disaster has a high value in disaster supplies ahead of a disaster. Thus, considering the case, the method helped the army to support their operations. Prepositioning resources help the military in restoring their defense forces (Tatham and Rietjens, 2016). Hence, they can use them at an event of any conflict. Moreover, the method has value as it helps the non-governmental organization in providing relief in advance of a disaster. The effort to move supplies made a significant impact on the success of the event. For example, the method helped to preserve transportation assets. It led to success, especially in setting up the desirable logistics strategy for disaster events that took place in the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Moreover, prepositioning helps in maintaining and securing large stocks of food, water, and emergency supplies for countries with high levels of corruption (Tatham and Christopher, 2018). The effort to move supplies of vaccines, antibiotics, and antidotes were desirable. Thus, doing preposition supplies in advance of a disaster helps in capital planning, and collaboration responds in the time of need. The event selected is a flood disaster. When this happens, the action to take to provide a better outcome is monitoring the environment by informing individuals about the disaster through advising individuals to get to high ground and avoid the already flooded area (Moftakhari and Matthew, 2017). It is also good to stay away from powered lines and electrical wires. It is also good to call for assistance and give the correct location information. Reading materials related to disaster is essential so that to get enough information on how to monitor disaster. Moreover, consulting individuals who might have experienced the disaster is essential. It is because getting their views is vital to monitoring the occurring type of disaster. Getting detailed information helps to take action during the flood. Post#2 The idea of prepositioning raised after being used in military strategies to respond effectively in a time manner to any threat (Apte & Yoho, 2011). By considering disasters as attacks, we should be prepared and plan a head of time to how we respond in causes of natural disasters or terrorist attacks, especially when we know for sure that we can’t anticipate that disaster is coming for certain. Prepositioning resources such as shelters, boats, bulldozers, medical supplies, food and water and all types of needed supplies, is part of the disaster planning and should meet multiple aspects such as when and where to locate our supplies. In areas that are repeatedly hit by disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, it will be crucial to have supplies ready to use along the year. Also, what can be more helpful is to find the appropriate area, out of the dangerous zone, and utilize it as the storage area. Moreover, other ideas can help in easy access to the storages area such as create more than one access road and build the storage in a high level specially in floods areas. Furthermore, having more than one supplies areas in cause of one is affected by the disaster. When we look back to Haiti earthquake in 2010, one of the major problems was the blocked routes the reduced the delivery of aid to those in need. However, the advantages of preparing in for disaster in advance are more than the disadvantages. Some of the advantages is to provide immediate assistance to disaster victims which is mainly one of the disaster management goals; saving lives (Rawls, 2008). On the other hand, I can’t actually think about disadvantages of being proactive in dealing with disasters. What is believe as a disadvantage is the incorrect preparing. That means setting a storage area in a bad place such as flooding area; which can result in loss a valuable time and money and affect negatively on the response process and on the recivers. I believe what happened following hurricane Katrina is an example of the lack of good preparation. In 2005, hurricane Katrina flooded New Orleans and killed more than 1800 people (Edwards, 2015). Also, it caused property damage that exceed $100 million. The failure of the disaster management includes many aspects, one of the is lack of supply failures. According to Edwards 2015, the prepositioned supplies before the storm were not enough and FEMA took days to deliver medical supplies to those in need. That failure has been a lesson that emphasize the importance of prepositioning needed resources ahead of time before disaster strike. ... Purchase answer to see full attachment