Fluent Essays

hi, i need help in an online English composition class. i need to complete 7 essays and 10 small quizzes(5 question). i will send you the rubric and sample for each essay and after u complete the essays we will start with the quizzes. most of the essays are 500 words evaluation_102.docx application_102.docx interview_102.docx proposalletter_102.docx mediaanalysis_102.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview Points 2 F Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea. Points 3 D-/D/D+ Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed. Support & Development Thesis support, thesis development, Evaluation of chosen critique, Use of second critique, use of examples, logic, and reason No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. No topic development. Student fails to evaluate most or all of the chosen critique. Topic development is flawed or non-existent. Coherence & Organization Introduction, conclusion, body No clear introduction, body, or conclusion. Little-to-no transitions. Demonstrates little-to-no Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate. Student may fail in some ways to evaluate the critic/author, the thesis, and the support of the chosen critique. A second critique may be altogether missing from the Evaluation. Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning. Introduction, body, and conclusion attempted but problematic. Few transitions. Perhaps Thesis & Focus Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions ENG 102 Evaluation Rubric Points Points 3.5 4 C-/C/C+ B-/B/B+ Thesis is identifiable, but Thesis is established and perhaps too narrow, too is consistently addressed broad, or otherwise throughout most of the problematic. Awareness paper. Awareness of of audience may be audience is sufficient. adequate but Central idea is clear and inconsistent. Central idea maintained in most of the is perhaps too general essay. and supported by irrelevant examples. More support is needed. Support is sufficient but Some examples may be perhaps flawed in some vague. Student evaluates way. the critic/author, the Student clearly evaluates thesis, and the support of the critic/author, the the chosen critique thesis, and the support of although evaluation may the chosen critique. A be flawed. A second second critique is used critique is used, perhaps somewhat effectively to ineffectively, to inform inform the Evaluation. the Evaluation. Some Most assertions are irrelevant support may be supposed with examples present, but most from the chosen critique evidence supports thesis. and the novel. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs. Identifiable introduction, Clear introduction, body, body, and conclusion; yet and conclusion although one significant weakness improvements could be is present: undeveloped made. Most paragraphs Points 5 A-/A/A+ Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout. Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement of evidence. Student clearly and effectively evaluates the critic/author, the thesis, and the support of the chosen critique. A second critique is effectively used to inform the Evaluation. All assertions are supported with examples from the chosen critique and the novel, and the thesis is supported throughout. Clear and effective introduction, body, and conclusion: Introduction establishes the essay’s paragraphs, transitions, topic sentences understanding of organization. Many sentences within paragraphs do not relate to each other and/or the paragraph’s topic. May contain no discernable topic sentences. numerous digressions. Mostly missing or problematic topic sentences. Demonstrates little understanding of organization. introduction, undeveloped conclusion, illogical paragraph order. Adequate transitions, perhaps some digressions. Some paragraphs may lack clear topic sentences. Demonstrates basic understanding of organization. have clear topic sentences. Essay establishes a clear plan of development. Transitions are clear throughout most of the paper. Demonstrates good understanding of organization. Language & Style Word choice, repetition, redundancy, awkwardness, article misuse, wrong word form (their/there, etc.), typos/misspellings, vocabulary May contain more than 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain more than 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Fails to demonstrate competent language use; sentences and vocabulary are inappropriate, facile, and/or incoherent. May contain 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Contains repetitive, incorrect, and/or insufficient sentence structure and/or limited vocabulary. May contain 4 – 5 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates competency with language use but sentence constructions and vocabulary may be limited or repetitive. May contain 2 – 3 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sufficient knowledge and skill with varied sentence construction and vocabulary. Unnecessary repetition is minor. Grammar Fragments, subject-verb agreement, verb tense errors, verb form errors, runons, pronoun agreement Contains more than 5 different grammar errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 4 – 5 different grammar errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 2 – 3 different grammar errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 1 grammar error, which may be repeated throughout the essay. main idea, and conclusion summarizes thesis and main ideas without merely copying and pasting from the introduction. Clear and effective transitions are present throughout the paper. Demonstrates excellent understanding of organization. May contain 1 error in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 1 error in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and skill with varied and complex sentence construction and vocabulary. Little-to-no unnecessary repetition. Contains either no grammar errors, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition. Punctuation & Capitalization Comma errors, comma splices, apostrophe errors, capitalization errors, semicolon errors, colon errors Format heading, title, margins, spacing, length*, underlined thesis *Length for Evaluation is 750 words minimum Contains more than 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 4 – 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 2 – 3 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 1 punctuation/capitalization error, which may be repeated throughout the essay. Contains either no punctuation/capitalization error, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition. Doesn’t meet formatting requirements: Doesn’t meet most formatting requirements: Meets some formatting requirements: Meets most formatting requirements: Meets all requirements. Formatting may be missing four or more elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Formatting may be missing three elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements. Length may not meet minimum requirements. Formatting may be missing two elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements (an essay that does not meet length minimum will score no higher than 3 in this category) Formatting may be missing one element (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length meets minimum requirements of 750 words. Formatting is appropriate in terms of heading, title, margins, spacing, underlining thesis. Length meets minimum requirements of 750 words. Use of Research & MLA Source minimums, incorporation of sources (including use of signal phrases), use of research to argue topic, MLA in-text quote formatting, Works Cited list This paper requires at least two critiques in addition to the novel (three total sources). Source minimum requirements are not met. Research is insufficient, irrelevant, or inadequate. Sources are not incorporated at all, or are done very poorly. Five or more errors in documenting sources using MLA style may be present. Works Cited page either omitted or formatted very poorly. It may be difficult or impossible to discern which sources are in the list. Source minimum requirements may not be met (Note: If source minimum is not met, the essay will score no higher than 2 in this category). Research is superficial and/or sources are incorporated poorly. No more than four different errors in documenting sources using MLA style may be present. These identical errors may be repeated. Works Cited page may contain significant formatting errors, and some sources may be omitted from the list. Source minimum requirements (two critiques + novel) are met. Research may be superficial, sources may be poorly incorporated. No more than three different errors in documenting sources using MLA style may be present. These identical errors may be repeated. Works Cited page may contain significant formatting errors, but all sources are listed. Source minimum requirements (two critiques + novel) are met. Fairly thorough research with mostly effective use of sources. Source minimum requirements (two critiques + novel) are met. Thoroughly researches the topic, uses sources effectively. No more than two different errors in documenting sources using MLA style. These identical two errors may be repeated. No more than one different error in documenting sources using MLA style. This identical error may be repeated. Works Cited page may contain minor formatting errors, but all sources are clearly listed. Works Cited page may contain minor formatting errors, but all sources are clearly listed. Thesis & Focus Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions Support & Development Thesis support, thesis development, assessment of novel’s literary qualities and social issues, use of examples, logic, and reason Coherence & Organization Points 2 F Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea. Points 3 D-/D/D+ Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Thesis fails to address the novel’s literary qualities or social issues. Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed. No support of thesis with relevant facts, examples, reasons, or evidence. No topic development. Failure to assess the novel’s literary qualities and social issues. Topic development is flawed or non-existent. Support is minimal, logically flawed, and/or inaccurate. The novels’ literary qualities and social issues are not assessed effectively throughout most of the essay. Topic development may have been attempted, but does not form conclusions and/or fails to exhibit clear reasoning. Introduction, body, and conclusion attempted but problematic. Few No clear introduction, body, or conclusion. Little-to-no transitions. ENG 102 Application Rubric Points Points 3.5 4 C-/C/C+ B-/B/B+ Thesis is identifiable, but Thesis is established and perhaps too narrow, too is consistently addressed broad, or otherwise throughout most of the problematic. Thesis paper. Thesis addresses addresses the novel’s the novel’s literary literary qualities and qualities and social issues social issues, perhaps effectively. Awareness of somewhat ineffectively. audience is sufficient. Awareness of audience Central idea is clear and may be adequate but maintained in most of the inconsistent. Central idea essay. is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples. More support is needed. Support is sufficient but Some examples may be perhaps flawed in some vague. The novel’s literary way. qualities and social issues The novel’s literary are assessed, perhaps qualities and social issues ineffectively. Some are assessed thoroughly irrelevant support may be and mostly effectively. present, but most Examples are sufficient. evidence supports thesis. Thesis is supported and developed in most paragraphs. Identifiable introduction, body, and conclusion; yet one significant weakness Clear introduction, body, and conclusion although improvements could be Points 5 A-/A/A+ Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Thesis clearly addresses the novel’s literary qualities and social issues very effectively. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout. Essay completely supports the thesis with logical arrangement of evidence. The novel’s literary qualities and social issues are assessed thoroughly and very effectively. Examples are excellent. All assertions are supported and relate to thesis. Clear and effective introduction, body, and conclusion: Introduction Introduction, conclusion, body paragraphs, transitions, topic sentences Demonstrates little-to-no understanding of organization. Many sentences within paragraphs do not relate to each other and/or the paragraph’s topic. May contain no discernable topic sentences. transitions. Perhaps numerous digressions. Mostly missing or problematic topic sentences. Demonstrates little understanding of organization. is present: undeveloped introduction, undeveloped conclusion, illogical paragraph order. Adequate transitions, perhaps some digressions. Some paragraphs may lack clear topic sentences. Demonstrates basic understanding of organization. made. Most paragraphs have clear topic sentences. Essay establishes a clear plan of development. Transitions are clear throughout most of the paper. Demonstrates good understanding of organization. Language & Style Word choice, repetition, redundancy, awkwardness, article misuse, wrong word form (their/there, etc.), typos/misspellings, vocabulary May contain more than 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain more than 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Fails to demonstrate competent language use; sentences and vocabulary are inappropriate, facile, and/or incoherent. May contain 6 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 6 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Contains repetitive, incorrect, and/or insufficient sentence structure and/or limited vocabulary. May contain 4 – 5 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates competency with language use but sentence constructions and vocabulary may be limited or repetitive. May contain 2 – 3 errors in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 2 – 3 errors in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sufficient knowledge and skill with varied sentence construction and vocabulary. Unnecessary repetition is minor. Grammar Fragments, subject-verb agreement, verb tense errors, verb form errors, runons, pronoun agreement Contains more than 5 different grammar errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 4 – 5 different grammar errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 2 – 3 different grammar errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 1 grammar error, which may be repeated throughout the essay. establishes the essay’s main idea, and conclusion summarizes thesis and main ideas without merely copying and pasting from the introduction. Clear and effective transitions are present throughout the paper. Demonstrates excellent understanding of organization. May contain 1 error in word choice, wordiness, redundancy, or awkwardness. May contain 1 error in inappropriate language for academic audience. Demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and skill with varied and complex sentence construction and vocabulary. Little-to-no unnecessary repetition. Contains either no grammar errors, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition. Punctuation & Capitalization Comma errors, comma splices, apostrophe errors, capitalization errors, semicolon errors, colon errors Format heading, title, margins, spacing, length*, underlined thesis *Length for Application is 750 words minimum Contains more than 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 3 – 4 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 4 – 5 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 2 – 3 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 2 – 3 different punctuation/capitalization errors. The identical 1 – 2 errors may be repeated throughout. Contains 1 punctuation/capitalization error, which may be repeated throughout the essay. Contains either no punctuation/capitalization error, or 1 – 2 different errors with no repetition. Doesn’t meet formatting requirements: Doesn’t meet most formatting requirements: Meets some formatting requirements: Meets most formatting requirements: Meets all requirements. Formatting may be missing four or more elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Formatting may be missing three elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements. Length may not meet minimum requirements. Formatting may be missing two elements (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length may not meet minimum requirements (an essay that does not meet length minimum will score no higher than 3 in this category) Formatting may be missing one element (either no title, incomplete heading, inappropriate spacing or margins, or thesis not underlined). Length meets minimum requirements of 750 words. Formatting is appropriate in terms of heading, title, margins, spacing, underlining thesis. Length meets minimum requirements of 750 words. Use of Research & MLA Source minimums, incorporation of sources (including use of signal phrases), use of research to argue topic, MLA in-text quote formatting, Works Cited list, credibility of sources This paper requires at least three credible sources in addition to the novel. Source minimum requirements are not met. Research is insufficient, irrelevant, or inadequate. Sources are not incorporated at all, or are done very poorly. Five or more errors in documenting sources using MLA style may be present. Works Cited page either omitted or formatted very poorly. It may be difficult or impossible to discern which sources are in the list. Source minimum requirements may not be met (Note: If source minimum is not met, the essay will score no higher than 2 in this category). Research is superficial and/or sources are incorporated poorly. No more than four different errors in documenting sources using MLA style may be present. These identical errors may be repeated. Works Cited page may contain significant formatting errors, and some sources may be omitted from the list. Source minimum requirements (three credible sources + the novel) are met. Research may be superficial, sources may be poorly incorporated. N ... Purchase answer to see full attachment