Fluent Essays

1) Sometimes it is helpful to get an outside perspective. In your discussion post, describe your selected social science issue and include two relevant questions that social science professionals (e.g., psychologists, sociologists, or anthropologists) might be interested in.In response to your peers, add a relevant question or summary that will support them in narrowing the investigative focus for their topic/issue. SEE THE RUBRIC BELOW.2) This course uses a MindEdge webtext. This webtext includes your readings, resources, interactive games, and graded activities. Many of the assignments in this course will be completed in MindEdge, so it is important to access this resource as soon as possible to begin your studies and move forward on your path to success. This learning resource is web-based;DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED ON HOW TO GET INTO THE WEBTEXT ONCE A TUTOR IS ACCEPTED.WEEK 2 SHORT RESPONSE HAS A RUBRIC AND GUIDELINES WHICH WILL BE ATTACHED . PLEASE FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES CAREFULLY. scs_200_week_2_short_response_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf rubric_discussion_undergrad__2_.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview SCS 200 Week 2 Short Response Guidelines and Rubric Overview: The short response activities in the webtext throughout this course are designed to show your understanding of key concepts as you engage with course content. Prompt: During the second week of the course, you will respond to several questions in the webtext as you complete each assigned learning block. At the end of Week 2, you will review your answers to these questions and ensure that you have responded to each question. It is important that you answer each question. Otherwise, the words no response will appear in brackets when you submit the assignment. The questions and their original locations in the webtext are listed in the table below in case you want to refer back to the reading as you edit, but you can edit your responses to all the questions directly in Theme: Exploring Social Science Issues, learning block 2-4 (page 2), before exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in the learning environment. Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Describe one of the beliefs and values of the Navajo as illustrated in your readings. Describe one way in which the Navajo have incorporated their beliefs and values into the societal structure on the reservation since regaining some autonomy in the 1970s. What beliefs and values can be found in your culture? How do these beliefs and values influence your day-to-day life? Adopt the social science perspective to create a list of questions about this issue. Write at least two questions each from the point of view of a psychologist, a sociologist, and an anthropologist. Theme: Exploring Social Science Issues, learning block 2-2 (page 3) Theme: Exploring Social Science Issues, learning block 2-3 (page 3) Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Each short response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length unless specifically noted otherwise in the instructions. Follow the instructions at the bottom of Theme: Exploring Social Science Issues, learning block 2-4 (page 2), to download your work and submit it to your instructor as a single Microsoft Word document uploaded in the learning environment. Refer to the Submitting Webtext Assignments Guide for assistance on downloading, saving, and submitting this assignment. Critical Elements Engagement and Relevance Critical Thinking Proficient (100\%) Written responses directly and comprehensively address short answer prompts, drawing from presented course concepts and terminology Written responses demonstrate understanding of course content through inclusion of original ideas and examples Needs Improvement (75\%) Written responses are topically related to short answer prompts, but responses do not consistently draw from presented course concepts and terminology Written responses demonstrate understanding of course content through reiteration of provided materials but do not consistently include original ideas and examples Not Evident (0\%) Written responses do not address topics identified in short answer prompts Value 60 Written responses do not reflect original ideas and examples 30 Articulation of Response Written responses are captured in complete sentences without errors impacting legibility and the clarity of response Written responses are captured in incomplete sentences or include numerous errors that negatively impact legibility and the clarity of response No written responses are captured in complete sentences Total 10 100\% Undergraduate Discussion Rubric Overview Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor. Directions For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts. For your initial post, do the following:  Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.  In Module One, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.  In Modules Two through Eight, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources. For your response posts, do the following:  Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread.  In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.  In Modules Two through Eight, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt. Rubric Critical Elements Comprehension Timeliness Engagement Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100\%) N/A Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100\%) Proficient Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85\%) Submits initial post on time (100\%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85\%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55\%) Submits initial post one day late (55\%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (55\%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0\%) Value 40 Submits initial post two or more days late (0\%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0\%) 10 30 Critical Elements Writing (Mechanics) Exemplary Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100\%) Proficient Writes posts that are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85\%) Needs Improvement Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55\%) Not Evident Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0\%) Value 20 Total 100\% ... Purchase answer to see full attachment