Fluent Essays

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal: Background Problem statement Purpose of the change proposal PICOT Literature search strategy employed Evaluation of the literature Applicable change or nursing theory utilized Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are createdPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. For the literature is required eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles ( only two reviews aere allowed in the literature if any) A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. (please make sure the literature is correct this is very important).The PICOT question is: In patients with diabetes mellitus 2, what is the effect of diet control as compared to medication in the management of the disease given six months?My practice is being held on a general practice medical office for patients 18 and older which pretty much is just a doctors office where patients come with all sort of concerns and Im under the supervision of a nurse practitioner who is the one that sees the patients most of the time.The population visiting the clinic are mostly Hispanics and Caucasians with Hispanics being the majority. This is a change proposal and based on the topic I choosed and the setting I need the change proposal to be related to teaching, maybe proposing in-services for the employees working in the clinic so they can provide better teaching to the patients on the importance of diet management in diabetes. The practice is being held on Del Prado Medical Center https://delpradomed2500del-prado-medical-center-in... rubric_print_format.xlsx Unformatted Attachment Preview Course Code NRS-490 Class Code NRS-490-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 60.0\% Background 5.0\% Problem Statement 5.0\% Change Proposal Purpose 5.0\% PICOT 5.0\% Literature Search Strategy 5.0\% Literature Evaluation 5.0\% Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2) 5.0\% Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2) 5.0\% Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3) 5.0\% Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2) 5.0\% Evidence of Revision 10.0\% Organization and Effectiveness 30.0\% Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0\% Argument Logic and Construction 10.0\% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0\% Format 10.0\% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0\% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0\% Total Weightage 100\% Assignment Title Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal Unsatisfactory 0-71\% (0.00\%) Background section is not present. Problem statement is not present. Purpose of change proposal is not present. PICOT is not present. Literature search strategy is not present. Literature evaluation is not present. Theory utilization is not present. Implementation plan is not present. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present. Appendices are not present. Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 300.0 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75\% (75.00\%) Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory 76-79\% (79.00\%) Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding. Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good 80-89\% (89.00\%) Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent 90-100\% (100.00\%) Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Comments Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned ... Purchase answer to see full attachment