Fluent Essays

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit. Choose a health issue or problem pertinent to a specific population experiencing a health disparity. In a 1,500-1,750 word paper, discuss the factors that contribute to the health issue, identify a theory or model that relates to the health issue, and propose a health promotion intervention to improve health outcomes. You may use any relevant resources from your Annotated Bibliography from WEEK 5 for support which is at the end of this posting. Include the following components:Introduction: Identify and describe the health issue you are addressing and the population affected. Provide a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper and a general introduction to the target population and the health issue.Relationship Between Health Issue and Target Population: Provide a description about the target population that you have selected, including demographic information about the population. Describe the health issue in relation to the population you chose.Contributing Factors/Social Determinants of Health: Describe the reasons or causes for the health issue. Analyze how social, cultural, behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue among this population, and the health disparity experienced by the population. Evaluate structural bias, social inequities, and racism that undermine health and create health inequity among this population. Describe under which level of interaction these causes and contributing factors fall: intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, or all three.Theory or Model: Identify the theory or model that best explains the behaviors associated with the health issue selected, as well as best matches the level of interaction for contributing factors. Discuss how this theory or model applies to the health issue you are addressing and provide a rationale for choosing this theory. Describe examples of how this theory has been used successfully in the research literature.Conclusion: Describe health promotion strategies or behavior change strategies to reduce health disparities and health inequity related to the health issue among this population.You are required to cite at least FIVE sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct. PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe...Read Chapters 14 and 15 in Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. URL: http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/wiley-and-sons/2017/health-behavior_theory-research-and-practice_ebook_5e.php Read The Effectiveness of Community Engagement in Public Health Interventions for Disadvantaged Groups: A Meta-Analysis, by OMara-Eves, Brunton, Oliver, Kavanagh, Jamal and Thomas, from BMC Public Health (2015).URL: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=102015223&site=eds-live&scope=site Read The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy, by Cacari-Stone, Wallerstein, Garcia, and Minkler, from American Journal of Public Health (2014).URL: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107874621&site=eds-live&scope=site Read From Design to Dissemination: Implementing Community-Based Participatory Research in Postdisaster Communities, by Lichtveld et al., from American Journal of Public Health (2016).URL: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=116097684&site=eds-live&scope=site Read Cultures of Engagement: The Organizational Foundations of Advancing Health in Immigrant and Low-Income Communities of Color, by Bloemraad and Terriquez, from Social Science and Medicine (2016).URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0277953616300582?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&ccp=y Read Building Effective Partnerships to Improve Birth Outcomes by Reducing Obesity: The Bmore Fit for Healthy Babies Coalition of Baltimore, by Truiett-Theodorson, Tuck, Bowie, Summers, and Kelber-Kaye, from Evaluation and Program Planning (2015).URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0149718914001372?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffbRead Section 1. Strategies for Community Change and Improvement: An Overview in Chapter 5 of the Community Tool Box website.URL: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/promotion-strategies/overview/main Read Section 8. Some Lessons Learned on Community Organization and Change in Chapter 1 of the Community Tool Box website.URL: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/overview/model-for-community-change-and-improvement/lessons-learned/main Read Section 5. Coalition Building I: Starting a Coalition in Chapter 5 of the Community Tool Box website.URL: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/promotion-strategies/start-a-coaltion/main Read Section 6. Coalition Building II: Maintaining a Coalition in Chapter 5 of the Community Tool Box website.URL: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/promotion-strategies/maintain-a-coalition/main Read Developing Effective Coalitions: An Eight-Step Guide, by Cohen, Baer, and Scatterwhite (2002), located on the County Health Rankings website.URL: http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/sites/default/files/eightstep.pdf MUST have 1,500 to 1,750 words with at least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.Annotated BibliographyLiao, Y., Wu, Q., Tang, J., Zhang, F., Wang, X., Qi, C., … & Cohen, J. (2016). The efficacy of mobile phone-based text message interventions (Happy Quit’) for smoking cessation in China. BMC Public Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3528-5The study by Liao et al. (2016) aims at investigating the efficacy of mobile phone text messages in reducing incidences of smoking within a community setting. The study addresses how information technology measures can be used to reduce smoking incidences within community settings. The information technology approach adopted is the use of mobile phone text messages. The intervention in the study also uses a section of the population affected by smoking incidences in China. The above approach could be adopted in reducing incidences of smoking in any healthcare setting. Richter, K. P., Shireman, T. I., Ellerbeck, E. F., Cupertino, A. P., Cox, L. S., Preacher, K. J., … & Lambart, L. (2015). Comparative and cost effectiveness of telemedicine versus telephone counseling for smoking cessation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3975The study by Richter et al. (2015) compared the effectiveness of two approaches in reducing the incidence of smoking through smoking cessation programs. Ideally, both interventions have been used in several settings in lowering incidences of smoking and could be applied as a measure in reducing smoking across clinical settings and communities with high incidences of smoking and its associated diseases. The paper uses two different information technology measures in lowering incidences of smoking cessation and provides information on which action is more effective. The two measures being compared include the use of telemedicine and telephone counseling. The most effective measure could be selected in reducing smoking incidences in cessation programs.Zeng, E. Y., Heffner, J. L., Copeland, W. K., Mull, K. E., & Bricker, J. B. (2016). Get with the program: Adherence to a smartphone app for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 63, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.007 Zeng et al. (2016) reports the use of mobile phone applications in reducing smoking cessation. The article is applicable in the current setting, considering that more populations have access to mobile phone applications. Also, most communities have reported high smoking incidences and in need of reasonable measures in reducing smoking cessation rates. The study is also relevant as it uses a populace that is affected by high smoking incidences. The study will serve to provide more information on the role of information technology measures in reducing the prevalence of smoking within communities. pub_520_week_7__benchmark__connecting_theory_to_practice_rubric_guide.xlsx Unformatted Attachment Preview Course Code PUB-520 Class Code PUB-520-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0\% Introduction 5.0\% Introduction Relationship 10.0\% Reasons or Causes 7.0\% Health inequity (C. 4.5) 7.0\% Intrapersonal, interpersonal community factors 6.0\% Theory or Model 20.0\% Conclusion 20.0\% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0\% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0\% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0\% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0\% Format 10.0\% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0\% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0\% Total Weightage 100\% Assignment Title Benchmark - Connecting Theory to Practice Unsatisfactory (0.00\%) Introduction that identifies and describes the health issue and affected population and provides a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper is not included. Description of the relationship between the health issue and the target population, including demographic information, is not included. Description of the reasons or causes of the health issue, including analysis of how social, cultural behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue is not included. Evaluation of the structural bias, social inequities, and racism that create health inequity is not included. Description of the level to which intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community factors contribute to the health issues is not included. Discussion of the theory or model that explains the behaviors associated with the health issue, rationale for selection of the theory or model, and examples of how the theory or model has been used successfully in the research literature is not included. Discussion of health promotion or behavior change strategies that can be implemented to reduce health disparities and inequity related to the health issue within the designated population is not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00\%) Introduction that identifies and describes the health issue and affected population and provides a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper is incomplete or incorrect. Description of the relationship between the health issue and the target population, including demographic information, is incomplete or incorrect. Description of the reasons or causes of the health issue, including analysis of how social, cultural behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue is incomplete or incorrect. Evaluation of the structural bias, social inequities, and racism that create health inequity is incomplete or incorrect. Description of the level to which intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community factors contribute to the health issues is incomplete or incorrect. Discussion of the theory or model that explains the behaviors associated with the health issue, rationale for selection of the theory or model, and examples of how the theory or model has been used successfully in the research literature is incomplete or incorrect. Discussion of health promotion or behavior change strategies that can be implemented to reduce health disparities and inequity related to the health issue within the designated population is incomplete or incorrect. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00\%) Introduction that identifies and describes the health issue and affected population and provides a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper is included but lacks explanation and relevant details. Description of the relationship between the health issue and the target population, including demographic information, is included but lacks explanation and relevant details. Description of the reasons or causes of the health issue, including analysis of how social, cultural behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue is included but lacks explanation and justification with supporting details. Evaluation of the structural bias, social inequities, and racism that create health inequity is included but lacks explanation and justification with supporting details. Description of the level to which intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community factors contribute to the health issues is included but lacks explanation and justification with supporting details. Discussion of the theory or model that explains the behaviors associated with the health issue, rationale for selection of the theory or model, and examples of how the theory or model has been used successfully in the research literature is included but lacks justification and relevant research examples. Discussion of health promotion or behavior change strategies that can be implemented to reduce health disparities and inequity related to the health issue within the designated population is included but lacks explanation and supporting details. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00\%) Introduction that identifies and describes the health issue and affected population and provides a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper is complete and includes explanation and relevant details. Description of the relationship between the health issue and the target population, including demographic information, is complete and includes explanation and relevant details. Description of the reasons or causes of the health issue, including analysis of how social, cultural behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue is complete and includes explanation and justification with supporting details. Evaluation of the structural bias, social inequities, and racism that create health inequity is complete and includes explanation and justification with supporting details. Description of the level to which intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community factors contribute to the health issues is complete and includes explanation and justification with supporting details. Discussion of the theory or model that explains the behaviors associated with the health issue, rationale for selection of the theory or model, and examples of how the theory or model has been used successfully in the research literature is complete and includes justification and relevant research examples. Discussion of health promotion or behavior change strategies that can be implemented to reduce health disparities and inequity related to the health issue within the designated population is complete and includes explanation and supporting details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00\%) Introduction that identifies and describes the health issue and affected population and provides a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant details. Description of the relationship between the health issue and the target population, including demographic information, is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant details. Description of the reasons or causes of the health issue, including analysis of how social, cultural behavioral, and psychological factors contribute to the health issue is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and justification with supporting details. Evaluation of the structural bias, social inequities, and racism that create health inequity is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and justification with supporting details. Description of the level to which intrapersonal, interpersonal, or community factors contribute to the health issues is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and justification with supporting details. Discussion of the theory or model that explains the behaviors associated with the health issue, rationale for selection of the theory or model, and examples of how the theory or model has been used successfully in the research literature is extremely thorough and includes substantial justification and relevant research examples. Comments Discussion of health promotion or behavior change strategies that can be implemented to reduce health disparities and inequity related to the health issue within the designated population is extremely thorough and includes substantial explanation and supporting details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned ... Purchase answer to see full attachment