System Safety and its Role in Manufacturing - Business Finance
From what you have read so far, discuss why System Safety has a role in the US manufacturing industry and how it can assist in reducing industrial deaths and injuries.In no more than 300 words, post your response in current APA formatMIL-STD-882, Standard Practice for System Safety by the Department of Defense (DoD)Section 1 - ScopeSection 3 - DefinitionsAppendix A (Guidance for the System Safety Effort), Section 3 - DefinitionsReview the article by Clifton Ericson in the May-June 2006 issue of the Journal of System Safety for an overview of the history and purpose of the MIL-STD-882 series.A Short History of System Safety mil_std_882e.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-STD-882E 11 May 2012 SUPERSEDING MIL-STD-882D 10 February 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE SYSTEM SAFETY AMSC N/A AREA SAFT MIL-STD-882E FOREWORD 1. This Standard is approved for use by all Military Departments and Defense Agencies within the Department of Defense (DoD). 2. This system safety standard practice is a key element of Systems Engineering (SE) that provides a standard, generic method for the identification, classification, and mitigation of hazards. 3. DoD is committed to protecting personnel from accidental death, injury, or occupational illness and safeguarding defense systems, infrastructure, and property from accidental destruction, or damage while executing its mission requirements of national defense. Within mission requirements, the DoD will also ensure that the quality of the environment is protected to the maximum extent practical. Integral to these efforts is the use of a system safety approach to identify hazards and manage the associated risks. A key DoD objective is to expand the use of this system safety methodology to integrate risk management into the overall SE process rather than addressing hazards as operational considerations. It should be used not only by system safety professionals, but also by other functional disciplines such as fire protection engineers, occupational health professionals, and environmental engineers to identify hazards and mitigate risks through the SE process. It is not the intent of this document to make system safety personnel responsible for hazard management in other functional disciplines. However, all functional disciplines using this generic methodology should coordinate their efforts as part of the overall SE process because mitigation measures optimized for only one discipline may create hazards in other disciplines. 4. This system safety standard practice identifies the DoD approach for identifying hazards and assessing and mitigating associated risks encountered in the development, test, production, use, and disposal of defense systems. The approach described herein conforms to Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02. DoDI 5000.02 defines the risk acceptance authorities. 5. This revision incorporates changes to meet Government and industry requests to reinstate task descriptions. These tasks may be specified in contract documents. When this Standard is required in a solicitation or contract, but no specific task is identified, only Sections 3 and 4 are mandatory. The definitions in 3.2 and all of Section 4 delineate the minimum mandatory definitions and requirements for an acceptable system safety effort for any DoD system. This revision aligns the standard practice with current DoD policy; supports DoD strategic plans and goals; and adjusts the organizational arrangement of information to clarify the basic elements of the system safety process, clarify terminology, and define task descriptions to improve hazard management practices. This Standard strengthens integration of other functional disciplines into SE to ultimately improve consistency of hazard management practices across programs. Specific changes include: a. Reintroduced task descriptions: (1) 100-series tasks – Management. (2) 200-series tasks – Analysis. ii MIL-STD-882E (3) 300-series tasks – Evaluation. (4) 400-series tasks – Verification. b. Emphasized the identification of applicable technical requirements. c. Included additional tasks: (1) (2) (3) (4) Hazardous Materials Management Plan. Functional Hazard Analysis. Systems-of-Systems Hazard Analysis. Environmental Hazard Analysis. d. Applied increased dollar values for losses in severity descriptions. e. Added “Eliminated” level for probability. f. Added software system safety techniques and practices. g. Updated appendices. 6. Comments, suggestions, or questions on this document should be addressed to Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command/SES (System Safety Office), 4375 Chidlaw Road, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-5006 or emailed to afmc.se.mailbox@wpafb.af.mil. Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the currency of this address information using the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) online database at https://assist.dla.mil. iii MIL-STD-882E CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................ii 1. 1.1 SCOPE ................................................................................................................................1 Scope ...................................................................................................................................1 2. 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ..........................................................................................1 General ................................................................................................................................1 Government documents ......................................................................................................1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks ...........................................................................1 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications ...............................................2 Order of precedence ............................................................................................................2 3. 3.1 3.2 DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................2 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................2 Definitions...........................................................................................................................4 4. 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5 4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.4. 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................................9 General ................................................................................................................................9 System safety requirements ................................................................................................9 System safety process .........................................................................................................9 Document the system safety approach .............................................................................. 10 Identify and document hazards ......................................................................................... 10 Assess and document risk ................................................................................................. 10 Identify and document risk mitigation measures .............................................................. 12 Reduce risk........................................................................................................................ 13 Verify, validate, and document risk reduction .................................................................. 13 Accept risk and document ................................................................................................. 13 Manage life-cycle risk....................................................................................................... 14 Software contribution to system risk ................................................................................ 14 Software assessments ........................................................................................................ 14 Software safety criticality matrix ...................................................................................... 16 Assessment of software contribution to risk ..................................................................... 17 5. 5.1 5.2 5.3 DETAILED REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 18 Additional information...................................................................................................... 18 Tasks ................................................................................................................................. 18 Task structure .................................................................................................................... 18 6. 6.1 6.2 6.3 NOTES .............................................................................................................................. 18 Intended use ...................................................................................................................... 18 Acquisition requirements .................................................................................................. 18 Associated Data Item Descriptions (DIDs)....................................................................... 19 iv MIL-STD-882E CONTENTS PARAGRAPH 6.4 6.5 PAGE Subject term (key word) listing......................................................................................... 19 Changes from previous issue ............................................................................................ 20 TASK SECTION 100 - MANAGEMENT TASK 101 TASK 102 TASK 103 TASK 104 TASK 105 TASK 106 TASK 107 TASK 108 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATION EFFORT USING THE SYSTEM SAFETY METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 22 SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM PLAN ................................................................ 24 HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................... 30 SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT REVIEWS/AUDITS ......................................... 36 INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM/WORKING GROUP SUPPORT ................. 37 HAZARD TRACKING SYSTEM ......................................................................... 38 HAZARD MANAGEMENT PROGRESS REPORT ............................................ 40 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................... 41 TASK SECTION 200 - ANALYSIS TASK 201 TASK 202 TASK 203 TASK 204 TASK 205 TASK 206 TASK 207 TASK 208 TASK 209 TASK 210 PRELIMINARY HAZARD LIST .......................................................................... 44 PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS .............................................................. 46 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................... 49 SUBSYSTEM HAZARD ANALYSIS .................................................................. 51 SYSTEM HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 54 OPERATING AND SUPPORT HAZARD ANALYSIS ....................................... 57 HEALTH HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 60 FUNCTIONAL HAZARD ANALYSIS ................................................................ 68 SYSTEM-OF-SYSTEMS HAZARD ANALYSIS ................................................ 71 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD ANALYSIS ....................................................... 73 TASK SECTION 300 - EVALUATION TASK 301 TASK 302 TASK 303 TASK 304 SAFETY ASSESSMENT REPORT ...................................................................... 78 HAZARD MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT....................................... 80 TEST AND EVALUATION PARTICIPATION................................................... 82 REVIEW OF ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSALS, CHANGE NOTICES, DEFICIENCY REPORTS, MISHAPS, AND REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION/WAIVER ......................................................................................... 84 TASK SECTION 400 - VERIFICATION TASK 401 TASK 402 TASK 403 SAFETY VERIFICATION .................................................................................... 86 EXPLOSIVES HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA ......................................... 88 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL DATA ................................................... 89 v MIL-STD-882E CONTENTS PARAGRAPH APPENDIX A APPENDIX B PAGE GUIDANCE FOR THE SYSTEM SAFETY EFFORT ....................................90 SOFTWARE SYSTEM SAFETY ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS ..........92 FIGURES PAGE 1. Eight elements of the system safety process ..........................................................................9 B-1. Assessing software’s contribution to risk ..........................................................................95 TABLES PAGE I. Severity categories ............................................................................................................... 11 II. Probability levels ................................................................................................................. 11 III. Risk assessment matrix ........................................................................................................ 12 IV. Software control categories.................................................................................................. 15 V. Software safety criticality matrix ......................................................................................... 16 VI. Relationship between SwCI, risk level, LOR tasks, and risk .............................................. 17 A-I. A-II. Task application matrix......................................................................................................90 Example probability levels ................................................................................................91 B-I. Software hazard causal factor risk assessment criteria ......................................................96 vi MIL-STD-882E 1. SCOPE 1.1 Scope. This system safety standard practice identifies the Department of Defense (DoD) Systems Engineering (SE) approach to eliminating hazards, where possible, and minimizing risks where those hazards cannot be eliminated. DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02 defines the risk acceptance authorities. This Standard covers hazards as they apply to systems / products / equipment / infrastructure (including both hardware and software) throughout design, development, test, production, use, and disposal. When this Standard is required in a solicitation or contract but no specific task is identified, only Sections 3 and 4 are mandatory. The definitions in 3.2 and all of Section 4 delineate the minimum mandatory definitions and requirements for an acceptable system safety effort for any DoD system. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 General. The documents listed in this section are specified in Sections 3, 4, or 5 of this Standard. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this Standard or recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet all specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3, 4, or 5 of this standard, whether or not they are listed. 2.2 Government documents. 2.2.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks. The following specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION AGREEMENTS AOP 52 - North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allied Ordnance Publication (AOP) 52, Guidance on Software Safety Design and Assessment of Munitions Related Computing Systems (Copies of this document are available online at https://assist.dla.mil/quicksearch/ or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOKS No Designator - Joint Software Systems Safety Engineering Handbook (Copies of this document are available online at http://www.system-safety.org/links/) 1 MIL-STD-882E 2.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications. The following other Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSTRUCTIONS DoDI 5000.02 DoDI 6055.07 - Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and Record Keeping (Copies of these document are available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/) 2.3 Order of precedence. In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence, with the exception of DoDI 5000.02. Nothing in this document supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained. 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Acronyms. AFOSH ANSI AOP AMSC ASSIST ASTM AT CAS CDR CFR COTS DAEHCP DID DoD DoDI DODIC DOT DT E3 ECP EHA EMD EO Air Force Occupational Safety and Health American National Standards Institute Allied Ordnance Publication Acquisition Management Systems Control Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System American Society for Testing and Materials Autonomous Chemical Abstract Service Critical Design Review Code of Federal Regulations Commercial-Off-the-Shelf Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Hazard Classification Procedures Data Item Description Department of Defense Department of Defense Instruction Department of Defense Identification Code Department of Transportation Developmental Testing Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Engineering Change Proposal Environmental Hazard Analysis Engineering and Manufacturing Development Executive Order 2 MIL-STD-882E EOD ESD ESOH FHA FMECA FTA GFE GFI GOTS HAZMAT HERO HHA HMAR HMMP HMP HSI HTS IEEE IM IMS IPT ISO IV&V JCIDS LOR MANPRINT MIL-HDBK MIL-STD MSDS NATO NAVMC NDI NEPA NSI NSN O&SHA OSH OSHA OT PESHE PDR PHA PHL PM PPE RAC Explosive Ordnance Disposal Electrostatic Discharge Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Functional Hazard Analysis Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis Fault Tree Analysis Government-Furnished Equipment Government-Furnished Information Government-Off-the-Shelf Hazardous Material Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance Health Hazard Analysis Hazard Management Assessment Report Hazardous Materials Management Plan Hazard Management Plan Human Systems Integration Hazard Tracking System Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Insensitive Munitions Integrated Master Schedule Integrated Product Team International Organization for Standardization Independent Verification and Validation Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System Level of Rigor Manpower and Personnel Integration Military Handbook Military Standard Material Safety Data Sheet North Atlantic Treaty Organization Navy and Marine Corps Non-Developmental Item National Environmental Policy Act No Safety Impact National Stock Number Operating and Support Hazard Analysis Occupational Safety and Health Occupational Safety and Health Administration Operational Testing Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation Preliminary Design Review Preliminary Hazard Analysis Preliminary Hazard List Program Manager Personal Protective Equipment Risk Assessment Code 3 MIL-STD-882E RF RFP RFR RFT SAR SAT SCC SCF SCI SDP SE SEMP SHA SMCC SoS SOW SRHA SRF SRI SRR SSF SSCM SSHA SSPP SSSF STP SwCI T&E TEMP TES WDSSR WG Radio Frequency Request for Proposal Radio Frequency Radiation Redundant Fault Tolerant Safety Assessment Report Semi-Autonomous Software Control Category Safety-Critical Function Safety-Critical Item Software Development Plan Systems Engineering Systems Engineering Management Plan System Hazard Analysis Special Material Content Code S ... Purchase answer to see full attachment
CATEGORIES
Economics Nursing Applied Sciences Psychology Science Management Computer Science Human Resource Management Accounting Information Systems English Anatomy Operations Management Sociology Literature Education Business & Finance Marketing Engineering Statistics Biology Political Science Reading History Financial markets Philosophy Mathematics Law Criminal Architecture and Design Government Social Science World history Chemistry Humanities Business Finance Writing Programming Telecommunications Engineering Geography Physics Spanish ach e. Embedded Entrepreneurship f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models g. Social-Founder Identity h. Micros-enterprise Development Outcomes Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada) a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami Calculus (people influence of  others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities  of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these ( American history Pharmacology Ancient history . Also Numerical analysis Environmental science Electrical Engineering Precalculus Physiology Civil Engineering Electronic Engineering ness Horizons Algebra Geology Physical chemistry nt When considering both O lassrooms Civil Probability ions Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years) or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime Chemical Engineering Ecology aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less. INSTRUCTIONS:  To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:  https://www.fnu.edu/library/ In order to n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.  Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear Mechanical Engineering Organic chemistry Geometry nment Topic You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts) Literature search You will need to perform a literature search for your topic Geophysics you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages). Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in in body of the report Conclusions References (8 References Minimum) *** Words count = 2000 words. *** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style. *** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)" Electromagnetism w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care.  The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management.  Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management. visual representations of information. They can include numbers SSAY ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3 pages): Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner. Topic: Purchasing and Technology You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.         https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0 Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will   finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program Vignette Understanding Gender Fluidity Providing Inclusive Quality Care Affirming Clinical Encounters Conclusion References Nurse Practitioner Knowledge Mechanics and word limit is unit as a guide only. The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su Trigonometry Article writing Other 5. June 29 After the components sending to the manufacturing house 1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard.  While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business No matter which type of health care organization With a direct sale During the pandemic Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record 3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015).  Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev 4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate Ethics We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities *DDB is used for the first three years For example The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case 4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972) With covid coming into place In my opinion with Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be · By Day 1 of this week While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013) 5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda Urien The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle From a similar but larger point of view 4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition After viewing the you tube videos on prayer Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages) The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough Data collection Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option.  I would want to find out what she is afraid of.  I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych Identify the type of research used in a chosen study Compose a 1 Optics effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources Be 4 pages in length soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test g One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti 3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family A Health in All Policies approach Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum Chen Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change Read Reflections on Cultural Humility Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident