System Safety and its Role in Manufacturing - Business Finance
From what you have read so far, discuss why System Safety has a role in the US manufacturing industry and how it can assist in reducing industrial deaths and injuries.In no more than 300 words, post your response in current APA formatMIL-STD-882, Standard Practice for System Safety by the Department of Defense (DoD)Section 1 - ScopeSection 3 - DefinitionsAppendix A (Guidance for the System Safety Effort), Section 3 - DefinitionsReview the article by Clifton Ericson in the May-June 2006 issue of the Journal of System Safety for an overview of the history and purpose of the MIL-STD-882 series.A Short History of System Safety
mil_std_882e.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
NOT MEASUREMENT
SENSITIVE
MIL-STD-882E
11 May 2012
SUPERSEDING
MIL-STD-882D
10 February 2000
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
STANDARD PRACTICE
SYSTEM SAFETY
AMSC N/A
AREA SAFT
MIL-STD-882E
FOREWORD
1. This Standard is approved for use by all Military Departments and Defense Agencies
within the Department of Defense (DoD).
2. This system safety standard practice is a key element of Systems Engineering (SE) that
provides a standard, generic method for the identification, classification, and mitigation of
hazards.
3. DoD is committed to protecting personnel from accidental death, injury, or occupational
illness and safeguarding defense systems, infrastructure, and property from accidental
destruction, or damage while executing its mission requirements of national defense. Within
mission requirements, the DoD will also ensure that the quality of the environment is protected
to the maximum extent practical. Integral to these efforts is the use of a system safety approach
to identify hazards and manage the associated risks. A key DoD objective is to expand the use of
this system safety methodology to integrate risk management into the overall SE process rather
than addressing hazards as operational considerations. It should be used not only by system
safety professionals, but also by other functional disciplines such as fire protection engineers,
occupational health professionals, and environmental engineers to identify hazards and mitigate
risks through the SE process. It is not the intent of this document to make system safety
personnel responsible for hazard management in other functional disciplines. However, all
functional disciplines using this generic methodology should coordinate their efforts as part of
the overall SE process because mitigation measures optimized for only one discipline may create
hazards in other disciplines.
4. This system safety standard practice identifies the DoD approach for identifying hazards
and assessing and mitigating associated risks encountered in the development, test, production,
use, and disposal of defense systems. The approach described herein conforms to Department of
Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02. DoDI 5000.02 defines the risk acceptance authorities.
5. This revision incorporates changes to meet Government and industry requests to reinstate
task descriptions. These tasks may be specified in contract documents. When this Standard is
required in a solicitation or contract, but no specific task is identified, only Sections 3 and 4 are
mandatory. The definitions in 3.2 and all of Section 4 delineate the minimum mandatory
definitions and requirements for an acceptable system safety effort for any DoD system. This
revision aligns the standard practice with current DoD policy; supports DoD strategic plans and
goals; and adjusts the organizational arrangement of information to clarify the basic elements of
the system safety process, clarify terminology, and define task descriptions to improve hazard
management practices. This Standard strengthens integration of other functional disciplines into
SE to ultimately improve consistency of hazard management practices across programs. Specific
changes include:
a. Reintroduced task descriptions:
(1) 100-series tasks – Management.
(2) 200-series tasks – Analysis.
ii
MIL-STD-882E
(3) 300-series tasks – Evaluation.
(4) 400-series tasks – Verification.
b. Emphasized the identification of applicable technical requirements.
c. Included additional tasks:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Hazardous Materials Management Plan.
Functional Hazard Analysis.
Systems-of-Systems Hazard Analysis.
Environmental Hazard Analysis.
d. Applied increased dollar values for losses in severity descriptions.
e. Added “Eliminated” level for probability.
f. Added software system safety techniques and practices.
g. Updated appendices.
6. Comments, suggestions, or questions on this document should be addressed to
Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command/SES (System Safety Office), 4375 Chidlaw Road,
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-5006 or emailed to afmc.se.mailbox@wpafb.af.mil.
Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the currency of this address
information using the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System
(ASSIST) online database at https://assist.dla.mil.
iii
MIL-STD-882E
CONTENTS
PARAGRAPH
PAGE
FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................ii
1.
1.1
SCOPE ................................................................................................................................1
Scope ...................................................................................................................................1
2.
2.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.3
APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ..........................................................................................1
General ................................................................................................................................1
Government documents ......................................................................................................1
Specifications, standards, and handbooks ...........................................................................1
Other Government documents, drawings, and publications ...............................................2
Order of precedence ............................................................................................................2
3.
3.1
3.2
DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................2
Acronyms ............................................................................................................................2
Definitions...........................................................................................................................4
4.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
4.3.5
4.3.6
4.3.7
4.3.8
4.4.
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................................9
General ................................................................................................................................9
System safety requirements ................................................................................................9
System safety process .........................................................................................................9
Document the system safety approach .............................................................................. 10
Identify and document hazards ......................................................................................... 10
Assess and document risk ................................................................................................. 10
Identify and document risk mitigation measures .............................................................. 12
Reduce risk........................................................................................................................ 13
Verify, validate, and document risk reduction .................................................................. 13
Accept risk and document ................................................................................................. 13
Manage life-cycle risk....................................................................................................... 14
Software contribution to system risk ................................................................................ 14
Software assessments ........................................................................................................ 14
Software safety criticality matrix ...................................................................................... 16
Assessment of software contribution to risk ..................................................................... 17
5.
5.1
5.2
5.3
DETAILED REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 18
Additional information...................................................................................................... 18
Tasks ................................................................................................................................. 18
Task structure .................................................................................................................... 18
6.
6.1
6.2
6.3
NOTES .............................................................................................................................. 18
Intended use ...................................................................................................................... 18
Acquisition requirements .................................................................................................. 18
Associated Data Item Descriptions (DIDs)....................................................................... 19
iv
MIL-STD-882E
CONTENTS
PARAGRAPH
6.4
6.5
PAGE
Subject term (key word) listing......................................................................................... 19
Changes from previous issue ............................................................................................ 20
TASK SECTION 100 - MANAGEMENT
TASK 101
TASK 102
TASK 103
TASK 104
TASK 105
TASK 106
TASK 107
TASK 108
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATION EFFORT USING THE
SYSTEM SAFETY METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 22
SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM PLAN ................................................................ 24
HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................... 30
SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT REVIEWS/AUDITS ......................................... 36
INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM/WORKING GROUP SUPPORT ................. 37
HAZARD TRACKING SYSTEM ......................................................................... 38
HAZARD MANAGEMENT PROGRESS REPORT ............................................ 40
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................... 41
TASK SECTION 200 - ANALYSIS
TASK 201
TASK 202
TASK 203
TASK 204
TASK 205
TASK 206
TASK 207
TASK 208
TASK 209
TASK 210
PRELIMINARY HAZARD LIST .......................................................................... 44
PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS .............................................................. 46
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................... 49
SUBSYSTEM HAZARD ANALYSIS .................................................................. 51
SYSTEM HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 54
OPERATING AND SUPPORT HAZARD ANALYSIS ....................................... 57
HEALTH HAZARD ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 60
FUNCTIONAL HAZARD ANALYSIS ................................................................ 68
SYSTEM-OF-SYSTEMS HAZARD ANALYSIS ................................................ 71
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD ANALYSIS ....................................................... 73
TASK SECTION 300 - EVALUATION
TASK 301
TASK 302
TASK 303
TASK 304
SAFETY ASSESSMENT REPORT ...................................................................... 78
HAZARD MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT....................................... 80
TEST AND EVALUATION PARTICIPATION................................................... 82
REVIEW OF ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSALS, CHANGE NOTICES,
DEFICIENCY REPORTS, MISHAPS, AND REQUESTS FOR
DEVIATION/WAIVER ......................................................................................... 84
TASK SECTION 400 - VERIFICATION
TASK 401
TASK 402
TASK 403
SAFETY VERIFICATION .................................................................................... 86
EXPLOSIVES HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA ......................................... 88
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL DATA ................................................... 89
v
MIL-STD-882E
CONTENTS
PARAGRAPH
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
PAGE
GUIDANCE FOR THE SYSTEM SAFETY EFFORT ....................................90
SOFTWARE SYSTEM SAFETY ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS ..........92
FIGURES
PAGE
1.
Eight elements of the system safety process ..........................................................................9
B-1.
Assessing software’s contribution to risk ..........................................................................95
TABLES
PAGE
I.
Severity categories ............................................................................................................... 11
II. Probability levels ................................................................................................................. 11
III. Risk assessment matrix ........................................................................................................ 12
IV. Software control categories.................................................................................................. 15
V. Software safety criticality matrix ......................................................................................... 16
VI. Relationship between SwCI, risk level, LOR tasks, and risk .............................................. 17
A-I.
A-II.
Task application matrix......................................................................................................90
Example probability levels ................................................................................................91
B-I.
Software hazard causal factor risk assessment criteria ......................................................96
vi
MIL-STD-882E
1. SCOPE
1.1 Scope. This system safety standard practice identifies the Department of Defense
(DoD) Systems Engineering (SE) approach to eliminating hazards, where possible, and
minimizing risks where those hazards cannot be eliminated. DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02
defines the risk acceptance authorities. This Standard covers hazards as they apply to systems /
products / equipment / infrastructure (including both hardware and software) throughout design,
development, test, production, use, and disposal. When this Standard is required in a solicitation
or contract but no specific task is identified, only Sections 3 and 4 are mandatory. The
definitions in 3.2 and all of Section 4 delineate the minimum mandatory definitions and
requirements for an acceptable system safety effort for any DoD system.
2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2.1 General. The documents listed in this section are specified in Sections 3, 4, or 5 of
this Standard. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this Standard or
recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to
ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet all
specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3, 4, or 5 of this standard, whether or not
they are listed.
2.2 Government documents.
2.2.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks. The following specifications, standards,
and handbooks form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise
specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION AGREEMENTS
AOP 52
-
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allied
Ordnance Publication (AOP) 52, Guidance on
Software Safety Design and Assessment of
Munitions Related Computing Systems
(Copies of this document are available online at https://assist.dla.mil/quicksearch/ or from the
Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA
19111-5094.)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOKS
No Designator
-
Joint Software Systems Safety Engineering
Handbook
(Copies of this document are available online at http://www.system-safety.org/links/)
1
MIL-STD-882E
2.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications. The following other
Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this document to the extent
specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the
solicitation or contract.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSTRUCTIONS
DoDI 5000.02
DoDI 6055.07
-
Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and
Record Keeping
(Copies of these document are available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/)
2.3 Order of precedence. In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and
the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence, with the exception of
DoDI 5000.02. Nothing in this document supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a
specific exemption has been obtained.
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1 Acronyms.
AFOSH
ANSI
AOP
AMSC
ASSIST
ASTM
AT
CAS
CDR
CFR
COTS
DAEHCP
DID
DoD
DoDI
DODIC
DOT
DT
E3
ECP
EHA
EMD
EO
Air Force Occupational Safety and Health
American National Standards Institute
Allied Ordnance Publication
Acquisition Management Systems Control
Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System
American Society for Testing and Materials
Autonomous
Chemical Abstract Service
Critical Design Review
Code of Federal Regulations
Commercial-Off-the-Shelf
Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Hazard Classification
Procedures
Data Item Description
Department of Defense
Department of Defense Instruction
Department of Defense Identification Code
Department of Transportation
Developmental Testing
Electromagnetic Environmental Effects
Engineering Change Proposal
Environmental Hazard Analysis
Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Executive Order
2
MIL-STD-882E
EOD
ESD
ESOH
FHA
FMECA
FTA
GFE
GFI
GOTS
HAZMAT
HERO
HHA
HMAR
HMMP
HMP
HSI
HTS
IEEE
IM
IMS
IPT
ISO
IV&V
JCIDS
LOR
MANPRINT
MIL-HDBK
MIL-STD
MSDS
NATO
NAVMC
NDI
NEPA
NSI
NSN
O&SHA
OSH
OSHA
OT
PESHE
PDR
PHA
PHL
PM
PPE
RAC
Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Electrostatic Discharge
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health
Functional Hazard Analysis
Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis
Government-Furnished Equipment
Government-Furnished Information
Government-Off-the-Shelf
Hazardous Material
Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance
Health Hazard Analysis
Hazard Management Assessment Report
Hazardous Materials Management Plan
Hazard Management Plan
Human Systems Integration
Hazard Tracking System
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Insensitive Munitions
Integrated Master Schedule
Integrated Product Team
International Organization for Standardization
Independent Verification and Validation
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
Level of Rigor
Manpower and Personnel Integration
Military Handbook
Military Standard
Material Safety Data Sheet
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Navy and Marine Corps
Non-Developmental Item
National Environmental Policy Act
No Safety Impact
National Stock Number
Operating and Support Hazard Analysis
Occupational Safety and Health
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Operational Testing
Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation
Preliminary Design Review
Preliminary Hazard Analysis
Preliminary Hazard List
Program Manager
Personal Protective Equipment
Risk Assessment Code
3
MIL-STD-882E
RF
RFP
RFR
RFT
SAR
SAT
SCC
SCF
SCI
SDP
SE
SEMP
SHA
SMCC
SoS
SOW
SRHA
SRF
SRI
SRR
SSF
SSCM
SSHA
SSPP
SSSF
STP
SwCI
T&E
TEMP
TES
WDSSR
WG
Radio Frequency
Request for Proposal
Radio Frequency Radiation
Redundant Fault Tolerant
Safety Assessment Report
Semi-Autonomous
Software Control Category
Safety-Critical Function
Safety-Critical Item
Software Development Plan
Systems Engineering
Systems Engineering Management Plan
System Hazard Analysis
Special Material Content Code
S ...
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
CATEGORIES
Economics
Nursing
Applied Sciences
Psychology
Science
Management
Computer Science
Human Resource Management
Accounting
Information Systems
English
Anatomy
Operations Management
Sociology
Literature
Education
Business & Finance
Marketing
Engineering
Statistics
Biology
Political Science
Reading
History
Financial markets
Philosophy
Mathematics
Law
Criminal
Architecture and Design
Government
Social Science
World history
Chemistry
Humanities
Business Finance
Writing
Programming
Telecommunications Engineering
Geography
Physics
Spanish
ach
e. Embedded Entrepreneurship
f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models
g. Social-Founder Identity
h. Micros-enterprise Development
Outcomes
Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada)
a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami
Calculus
(people influence of
others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities
of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these (
American history
Pharmacology
Ancient history
. Also
Numerical analysis
Environmental science
Electrical Engineering
Precalculus
Physiology
Civil Engineering
Electronic Engineering
ness Horizons
Algebra
Geology
Physical chemistry
nt
When considering both O
lassrooms
Civil
Probability
ions
Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years)
or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime
Chemical Engineering
Ecology
aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less.
INSTRUCTIONS:
To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:
https://www.fnu.edu/library/
In order to
n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading
ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.
Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear
Mechanical Engineering
Organic chemistry
Geometry
nment
Topic
You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts)
Literature search
You will need to perform a literature search for your topic
Geophysics
you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes
Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience
od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages).
Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in
in body of the report
Conclusions
References (8 References Minimum)
*** Words count = 2000 words.
*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.
*** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)"
Electromagnetism
w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care. The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases
e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management. Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management.
visual representations of information. They can include numbers
SSAY
ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3
pages):
Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada
making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner.
Topic: Purchasing and Technology
You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class
be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique
low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.
https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0
Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo
evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program
Vignette
Understanding Gender Fluidity
Providing Inclusive Quality Care
Affirming Clinical Encounters
Conclusion
References
Nurse Practitioner Knowledge
Mechanics
and word limit is unit as a guide only.
The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su
Trigonometry
Article writing
Other
5. June 29
After the components sending to the manufacturing house
1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend
One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard. While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or
Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business
No matter which type of health care organization
With a direct sale
During the pandemic
Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record
3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i
One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015). Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev
4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal
Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate
Ethics
We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities
*DDB is used for the first three years
For example
The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case
4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972)
With covid coming into place
In my opinion
with
Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA
The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be
· By Day 1 of this week
While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013)
5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda
Urien
The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle
From a similar but larger point of view
4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open
When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition
After viewing the you tube videos on prayer
Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages)
The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough
Data collection
Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an
I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option. I would want to find out what she is afraid of. I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an
Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych
Identify the type of research used in a chosen study
Compose a 1
Optics
effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte
I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources
Be 4 pages in length
soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test
g
One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research
Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti
3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family
A Health in All Policies approach
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum
Chen
Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change
Read Reflections on Cultural Humility
Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing
Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section
Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott
Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident