Fluent Essays

For this Assignment:Review the Final Project Guidelines provided in this module’s Learning Resources.Carefully review your Gitlin & Lyons text, the University of Wisconsin-Extension resource, and the Community Tool Box resource as well as other Learning Resources that focus on methodology and evaluation. You may also find additional online information from reputable grant-related organizations, such as Foundation Center and individual private funders.Remember that this content must demonstrate that it addresses funder interests as well as the grantee perspective.In 3–5 pages, provide your Methodology and Evaluation Plans.In developing the methodology for your project, keep these thoughts in mind:A project should undertake only activities that will move it toward the objectives.If any activities are not necessary for reaching the objectives, do not include them in the proposal.The methodology includes the day-to-day, week-to-week, and/or month-to-month activities that will be carried out during the project period. module_4_week_2_assignment.docx md4assgn1singletont.docx md3assgnsingletont.docx md1assgnsingletont.docx Unformatted Attachment Preview • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o o • o • o The methodology section is one of the core components of the grant. This section is concerned with addressing the question: “How will you carry out the project?” (Gitlin & Lyons, 2014, p. 92). For example, if your proposal is for a nonprofit-related project, you might identify the population served or indicate who will receive services. Depending on the grant type, you may also include the research sample and associated inclusion criteria. A research proposal may also include the research design strategy, assumptions, validity, reliability, statistical analysis, timeline, and evaluation plans. Finally, in this section you may address human resources requirements and materials or supplies needed to complete the project. In recent years, evaluation plans have become increasingly important to prospective funders. Competition for grants is intense, and funders must feel confident that money will be well spent and that projects can be appropriately evaluated. This is an important consideration for the grant seeker as well. Your organization will also want to be assured that the time and effort put into a project proves that the objectives are met and if not, why. For this Assignment: Review the Final Project Guidelines provided in this module’s Learning Resources. Carefully review your Gitlin & Lyons text, the University of Wisconsin-Extension resource, and the Community Tool Box resource as well as other Learning Resources that focus on methodology and evaluation. You may also find additional online information from reputable grant-related organizations, such as Foundation Center and individual private funders. Remember that this content must demonstrate that it addresses funder interests as well as the grantee perspective. In 3–5 pages, provide your Methodology and Evaluation Plans. In developing the methodology for your project, keep these thoughts in mind: A project should undertake only activities that will move it toward the objectives. If any activities are not necessary for reaching the objectives, do not include them in the proposal. The methodology includes the day-to-day, week-to-week, and/or month-to-month activities that will be carried out during the project period. The Methodology includes: Program description Research design Human subjects (sample) Study validity and reliability Assumptions and limitations Time line Analysis (and/or see Evaluation below) Non-personnel resources Facilities, supplies, technology, etc. Any non-personnel resources that will appear in the proposal budget should be described Personnel resources Who will be assigned or hired? Management plan (Work plan) Who will be responsible for which activities o o • • o • • • What is the timeline associated with activities (first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, fourth quarter, ongoing)? How will the project be managed? The Evaluation Plan includes: Description of the specific criteria that will measure the success of the project Explanation of data that will be collected Verify if your grant application will require an institutional review board (IRB) approval. Explanation of the data collection plans at the beginning, mid-program, and final evaluation Evaluation instruments that will be used and an explanation of why these instruments were selected Plans for writing the periodic reports to keep the funder updated Running Head: BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Part 3: Budget, Budget Justification/Narrative, & Sustainability Plan Tracy D. Singleton Walden University January 2, 2020 1 BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Part 3: Budget, Budget Justification/Narrative, & Sustainability Plan The project in this context revolves around the implementation of the program meant to improve the nutrition and health status of the general community. The creation of the program came from the analysis of one of the leading community health issues affecting the majority of the people in the country (Popkin & Hawkes, 2016). The success of the program will depend on various factors. For instance, one of the main factors associated with the success of the program includes the available support from the relevant stakeholders and finances. This section builds upon the previous submission outlining the budgetary requirements for the program. The following section describes the budget required to complete and support the operations of the program. Budget 2 3 BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Personnel Personnel Time/Effort Time/Effort Name Title Percentage Project Dollar Grand Amount Total Requested Requested Dollar for Salary for Fringe Amount Benefits Requested Hours/Week Amount (\%) Name Dollar 60 40 20000 2000 22000 60 40 16000 2000 18000 60 40 12000 3000 15000 60 40 8000 2000 10000 60 40 8000 2000 10000 60 50 5000 3000 8000 250 69000 14000 83000 Director Name Project Coordinator Name Clinical Coordinator Name Academic Coordinator Name Project Evaluator Name Project Secretary Subtotals 4 BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Consultant 60 40 4000 1000 5000 Contracts 60 40 4000 1000 5000 Staff 70 50 5000 1000 6000 NA NA 3000 1000 4000 NA NA 4000 1000 5000 NA NA 2500 500 3000 Subtotals 130 22500 5500 28000 Grand 380 91500 18500 111000 Costs Travel Itemized Equipment Supplies (itemize by category) Other Expenses Total Direct Costs Narrative The salaries are based on the number of hours worked and the position held. For instance, the project will benefit from the services offered by the project director. The project director will operate a total of 40 hours every week at a rate of $500 for each hour. The total payment for the BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN 5 project director for the program amounts to $20000 as indicated above. The salaries for the project coordinator are at a rate of $400 each hour working for 40 hours each week. The rate for payment of the wages for the clinical and academic coordinators are $300 and $200 working for 40 hours, respectively. On the other hand, the rate of wages for project evaluator is $200 at a total of 40 hours. Finally, the project secretary is paid a rate of $100 for 40 hours. The mentioned parties will be given fringe benefits according to their ranks and work done. For instance, the fringe benefits for the project director and .coordinator is $2000, bringing the total salary at $22000 and $18000 respectively. The fringe benefits for the clinical coordinator is $3000, while that of the academic coordinator and project evaluator is $2000. Finally, the fringe benefits for the project secretary is $3000 based on the work done, bringing the total salary to $8000. The project will require the services of a consultant who will be paid for 40 hours per week and earn a total of $4000 by the end of the program. The travel costs have been estimated to be $6000 to cater for the movement of staff members from one location to another. Further, the project will require equipment such as a computer, printer and additional stationery which will cost an estimated value of $4000. The program supplies will amount to about $5000 with different budgets of $3000 to cater for unforeseen events and occurrences. The total weekly budget for the project amounts to $110000. Completing the project in 4 weeks pushes the total cost and budget at $440000. The salaries for the team members mentioned above cater to the completion of the project. BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN 6 Sustainability plan One of the most common problems which can occur in the long run revolves around the failure of the adopted programs and hence project. Lack of the creation of a sustainability program undermines the ability of the project to complete successfully even with the exhaustion of the allocated finances. Therefore, it is worth noting that the continuity of the project will require the team to identify an alternative source of income. Donations are one of the most common forms of revenue which could support the completion of the project regardless of the exhaustion of the current budget. The second source of income would be to seek additional financing from the sponsors. This option could allow the team to look for additional finances. It would be viable to create other tools and products which could be used to attract and appeal to the general community. For instance, the team could create apparel that could be sold to the general population in support of the project and program. The sale of these products will create a platform for increasing the avenues for acquiring additional revenue to guarantee sustainability in the long run (Kerzner, 2017). BUDGET, BUDGET JUSTIFICATION, & SUSTAINABILITY PLAN References Popkin, B. M., & Hawkes, C. (2016). The sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4(2), 174186. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons. 7 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Writing the Grant Part 1: Needs Statement, Goals, and Objectives Tracy D. Singleton Walden University 1 2 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Writing needs assessment Overview Over the recent past, there has been an increase in the number of health conditions that are linked with the eating habits that people may adopt (Popkin & Howkes, 2016). As a result of this, it has become a significant concern for the implementation of programs that may enable t people in the modern-day communities and from different economic backgrounds to learn about the areas that they may need to focus on in order to improve their health. Teaching people more regarding the benefits that may be directly linked with positive nutrition is another reliable method that may need to be put in place in the attempt of creating a positive insight that the community may need in order to manage some of the problems that may be linked with negative nutrition choices (Abel Smith, 2018). Although not all people may have quality information, or the means that may enable them to make critical decisions regarding nutritional choices, the little information that they have is imperative for giving them assurance regarding the objectives that they may have. The development of a program that will improve the exposure as well as the insight that specific communities may have regarding their shopping activities, and their product choices that they may engage in is among the areas that may result in the improvement of the results that one may expect in this area. The following section presents the goals, as well as needs that will be considered in “Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun)” that is aimed at improving the exposure that communities have regarding healthy eating practices and access to healthy items with the means that are available to them. In this project, the assessment of the possible 3 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES factors that may have a negative influence towards the completion of the project is among the considerations that will facilitate the implementation of a reliable approach that will lead towards the improvement o the performance of this program. Goals and objectives Grant Goal 1 Develop quality recruitment techniques that will enable the targeted audience to learn about the healthy shopping program, thus resulting in its integration. In this, the goal is to improve the participant recruitment that will make it possible for the community to learn about the program and the benefits that it may possess. Grant Goal 2 Collaboration is among the factors that may promote the improvement of the integration process. This goal, for that case, aims at increasing the collaborative encounters with the education as well as the healthcare system. This goal will incorporate several options that may directly relate to the Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun)” program that will enable the audience to ensure that they engage in effective cooking and shopping practices. Grant Goal 3 Sustainable healthy eating is responsible for the improvement of the quality of outcome among the audience that the program targets. The Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun)”, in that case, aims at increasing the sustainable healthy eating through the provision of information regarding its benefits, thus reaching out to the selected audience. 4 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Objective 1 The objective of the program is to offer training regarding the preparation of meals and also enable the targeted audience to learn how they can shop for the food products that they need. After the implementation of the program, there will be an increase in the insight that the audience has regarding leaving comfort zones and engaging in activities that leads to a quality health outcome. Objective 2 Create a platform where people can learn about the needs to engage in healthy eating habits that may help them. Through this project, there will be an improvement of self-sufficiency in the way that the people completes their shopping practices for food as well as the food preparation methods that they rely on. Reaching out to a broader community will lead towards the improvement of the appreciation that the community have regarding the need to follow appropriate eating practices. Objective 3 The program aims at, reducing the cost that is incurred by the members of the general community when they are looking for methods of healthy food preparation. The inclusion of areas where the targeted audience may obtain low-cost food and the physical activities that they need to engage in is among the methods that the program will rely on in ensuring that it reduces the cost that is incurred in addressing some of the health conditions that may be linked with the poor eating habits that they may adopt. 5 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Evaluation criteria 1 The selection of the most appropriate approach for analyzing the success of the program will play a critical role in the improvement of the performance of the program. In this case, the assessment will require one to evaluate the rate at which the general community appreciates the implementation process and the rate at which they are willing to change and act in accordance to the benefits that are presented by the program. The assessment of the rate at which the community appreciates the benefits of this program will lead toward the conclusion regarding its success. Evaluation criteria 2 Evaluating the rate at which the different stakeholders will play an essential role in making a decision regarding the working of this program. This evaluation will make it possible for the team to decide more regarding the position that each stakeholder played towards the improvement of the programs completion as well as in the development of the rate at which the program leads to improved performance. Since the rate at which the stakeholders in the health sector, as well as nutrition specialists interact, enables the reduction of some of the implementational problems that may be experienced, it will be necessary that the rate of interaction is evaluated in order to reduce some of the problems that could result in the failure of the program. 6 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES Evaluation criteria 3 The evaluation will involve the assessment of the time that it takes for the targeted audience to learn about the role that this program will have. In this evaluation criterion, the rate at which the audience appreciates the program will be used to determine whether it has reached out to the intended goals or not. In addition to this, the assessment will incorporate the analysis of the rate at which sustainable eating habits are put in place in the general community that the program may target. 7 Running Head: WRITING THE GRANT PART 1: NEEDS STATEMENT, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES References Abel-Smith, B. (2018). An introduction to health: policy, planning and financing. Routledge. Popkin, B. M., & Hawkes, C. (2016). The sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4(2), 174186. Finalize Selection of a Project and Funder Tracy D. Singleton Walden University Abstract Recipients of SNAP/WIC benefits become so reliant on not having to pay for food that they never learn to include food cost into their monthly budgets, so when families no longer have benefits they become food insecure. According to the USDA Food and Nutrition Service, https://www.fns.usda.gov, in November of 2017 there was an estimated 22,108,85 families in the United Sates receiving some type of SNAP/WIC benefits. Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun)” is an innovative way to teach SNAP and WIC benefit recipients how to shop differently for food, how to make food last, how to meal prep, and how to prepare recipes., shop correctly. This program will help participants to become more self-sufficient. Recipients will learn how to get out of their comfort zone and try things they have never experienced before. This program should be funded because it has a specific target audience, it knows its needs, and it will work within the community, program staff is already in place as volunteers. The S.M.A.R.T objectives are already in place, and the program knows how they will utilize the funds. HEHS will have volunteer dieticians, local farmers, a chef who will instruct on how to cook healthy meals, a professional shopper who will teach perceptive shopping skills on a budget. Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun) participants will feel that they are accomplishing and learning new skills. HEHS (let’s make it fun)” participants will have the opportunity to bring their children to learn the process of trying new and healthy foods. learning to cook meals and make snacks that require little to no cooking, and growing fresh vegetables. This program is different because grant funding will allow for participants to be provided with correct measuring utensils, and cook books. Participants will also be given groceries after cooking classes to attempt make the meals in their own homes. The RFP that my organization Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun) will be pursuing for is the Cooking Matters grant. https://cookingmatters.org/grants-availablecooking-matters . What makes you confident that this RFP is worth pursuing? This RFP is worth Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun) pursuing due to the fact that the RFP is giving funding for the same reasoning as Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun). The SMART objectives are the same as well. Cooking matters.org believes that having knowledge on shopping, cooking, reading food labels, and cooking in a hands on atmosphere helps to empower families with the skills to be selfsufficient. This RFP believes in giving organizations funds to teach families the importance of having enough to eat, how to make healthy meals, having the knowledge on how to purchase healthy foods, and how to cook healthy foods with the assistance of volunteers in the actual settings they are learning about. How did you evaluate the RFPs? I evaluated this RFP on the facts that it was is a good fit for Healthy Eating, Healthy Shopping (let’s make it fun) my organiza ... Purchase answer to see full attachment