Fluent Essays

1. To complete this assignment, use You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Cant Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students and the guidelines for writing in the topic study materials. Write a 250-500-word summary of the article that includes paraphrases of the article, the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Reminder: This is an academic exercise that should not be written in first person. This is an APA paper that includes a separate title page with running head and a reference page. This is the article website: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=128789386&site=ehost-live&scope=site This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Rubric attached 2. Pick the industry health care. Using Google Scholar, the GCU Library, or another reputable site, identify industry-relevant scholarly sources that support the three pillars concepts: servant leadership, ethics, and entrepreneurism. Refer to the topic study materials to determine what is considered a scholarly resource. Create a title page and a references list that cites nine references from the past five years. Include at the following types of references: Five journal articles (include at least one article for each of the three pillars: servant leadership, ethics, and entrepreneurism)One bookOne websiteOne dissertation/thesis from a databaseOne book chapter Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. rubric_print_format.xlsx Unformatted Attachment Preview Course Code UNV-504 Class Code UNV-504-O101 Criteria Content Percentage 60.0\% Summary of Article 30.0\% Research Problem, Questions, Method, Findings, and Implications Discussed by the Authors 30.0\% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 40.0\% Language Use and Audience Awareness (e.g., sentence construction, word choice) 10.0\% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0\% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 10.0\% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0\% Total Weightage 100\% Assignment Title Article Review Unsatisfactory (0.00\%) Summary of the article is insufficient or not present. Guidelines were not followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials. Summary does not present the research problem, questions, method, findings, and/or implications discussed by the authors. Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 150.0 Less Than Satisfactory (74.00\%) Summary of the article is unclearly written. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials, but summary is incomplete or rudimentary. Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications, but explanation is insufficient or rudimentary. Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00\%) Summary of the article is written clearly with paraphrases. Guidelines were sufficiently followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials. Summary sufficiently presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00\%) Summary of the article is written clearly and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner. Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors in an academic manner. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00\%) Summary of the article is written clearly, thoroughly, and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of academic writing. Summary thoroughly presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of the overall concept made by the author. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Comments Points Earned ... Purchase answer to see full attachment