Fluent Essays

. Follow the instruction to write 800words presentation draftYou only need to deal with the part3 and part4 of the main section. Please write something thats easy to memorize since its a speech draftPlease go through all instruction and requirements carefully All the work must be original wmgm102_presentation_assessment_guide_2019_t6.pdf wmgm102_group_presentation_marking_rubric.pdf Unformatted Attachment Preview MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE ASSESSMENT WMGM102 PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT DETAILS Unit Name: Assessment Task: Total Marks: Due: Principles of Management Group Presentation 100 Week 6, Lesson 3 Unit Code: Term & Year: Weighting: WMGM102 Term 6, 2019 25\% NATURE OF THE TASK This task has an individual and group component. Students will be evaluated on their performance skills, knowledge of the assigned business and ability to apply relevant theory to each question. Each group will have 4 – 5 members. • Group mark – 10\% • Individual mark – 15\% INSTRUCTIONS Teams will be formed in Week 3, Lesson 3, and each team will be allocated one company from the list below. Students are required to create a presentation in response to the questions posed below. Note that the first slide in your presentation should include the following information: • • • • Company Name The names of all students in the team The student ID number of all students in the team Class day, time and class group number Please note, each team member will cover one aspect – strategy, external forces analysis, ethics & CSR, business culture and structure. The team is to work collaboratively on the background and conclusion. A PowerPoint presentation will be created and uploaded to Turnitin. Companies: A. Walt Disney B. FedEx C. Qantas D. Nike E. Coca Cola INTRODUCTION: − Background: • History • Founder • Location • Competition • Size • Products/services offered Page 1 of 4 MAIN SECTIONS: 1. Strategy: What is the strategic purpose of your business? What tactical strategy is used to compete? What recommendations can you provide about the relevance of these strategies today? 2. External forces analysis: what are the external opportunities and threats facing your business? Make recommendations on how your business can plan and respond to these external forces. 3. Ethics and social responsibility: At what level of ethics and CSR is your business operating? Is this enough? What recommendations can you provide? 4. Business culture: Using Schein’s 3 layers, describe the culture. Using Cameron & Quinn’s Typology identify the type of culture. Is this suitable? What recommendations can you provide? 5. Structure: Discuss the factors that are influencing the structure of your company. In your opinion, discuss whether it is best for your company to utilise a more mechanistic or organic structure? CONCLUSION HOW TO PRESENT YOUR ASSIGNMENT The marking criteria rubric has been placed in iLearn (Assessment Section). The length of the presentation will be 15 minutes with an additional 5 minutes for audience engagement. Each group must upload their PowerPoints to Turnitin and the similarly should be no higher than 10\%. A copy of the Slideshow must be handed in to your teacher prior to the performance, with 2 – 4 slides per A4 sheet. Remember to include “citations” on each slide to demonstrate academic honesty. Students will be expected to use a variety of sources, including a management textbook, the website of the designated company and any additional peer reviewed or non-scholarly source. All presentation slides must include a reference list. A minimum of three (3) sources is expected from each student. It is expected that all students will refer to the textbook for additional detail on the theoretical underpinnings of their section. Remember to number the slides, and include full student names and details, in order of their appearance. POWERPOINT SLIDES SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS One copy of the presentation slides must be submitted via Turnitin in iLearn (see the Unit Guide for deadline details). Only one member of your team should complete this task. A hard copy must be handed to your teacher in Week 6, Lesson 3, before the commencement of the presentation. Guidance on how to submit a Turnitin assignment may be accessed from: http://mq.edu.au/iLearn/student_info/assignments.htm#turnitin. If you cannot access or view your submission via Turnitin in iLearn, you have not correctly submitted your work and will need to do so prior to the due date. (If you require assistance submitting through Turnitin, you may lodge a OneHelp Ticket or refer to the IT help page.) You may make several submissions via Turnitin to check your work for plagiarism and make adjustments accordingly up until the due date. If you submit again after the due date your submission will be counted as a late submission and penalties will apply (see below). Please note that for a first time submission the similarity report will be available immediately but for any subsequent submissions it may take 24 hours for the similarity report to be generated in Turnitin. Page 2 of 4 Please note that it is your responsibility to: • allow sufficient time for submission of your work and any uploading of documents so try to avoid submitting your work just prior to the deadline. • ensure that you make the correct submission and that your document can be viewed in Turnitin. Please also note that technical issues such as an internet outage or computer failure are not considered grounds for special consideration. For further details please check the Special Consideration Policy. LATE SUBMISSIONS If a student is absent from this assessment without grounds for special consideration (See Special Consideration Policy) the student will receive zero marks for the assessment task. RETENTION OF RECORDS Student are required to keep a copy of all items submitted or completed for the purpose of assessment or evaluation until the end of the grade appeal period. FEEDBACK Feedback will be provided face to face directly after the presentation. Marks will be available in Gradebook. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY Using the work or ideas of another person, whether intentionally or not, and presenting them as your own without clear acknowledgement of the source is called Plagiarism. Macquarie University promotes awareness of information ethics through its Academic Integrity Policy. This means that: • • • • all academic work claimed as original must be the work of the person making the claim all academic collaborations of any kind must be acknowledged academic work must not be falsified in any way when the ideas of others are used, these ideas must be acknowledged appropriately. All breaches of the Academic Integrity Policy are serious and penalties apply. Students should be aware that they may fail an assessment task, a unit or even be excluded from the University for breaching the Academic Integrity Policy. EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENTS Students are responsible for their learning and are expected to: • Actively engage with assessment tasks, including carefully reading the guidance provided, understanding criteria, spending sufficient time on the task and submitting work on time; • Read, reflect and act on feedback provided; • Actively engage in activities designed to develop assessment literacy, including taking the initiative where appropriate (e.g. seeking clarification or advice, negotiating learning contracts, developing grading criteria and rubrics); • Provide constructive feedback on assessment processes and tasks through student feedback mechanisms (e.g. student surveys, suggestions for future offerings, student representation on committees); • Ensure that their work is their own; and Page 3 of 4 • Be familiar with University policy and faculty procedures and act in accordance with those policy and procedures. MARKING CRITERIA Please review the marking rubric in iLearn. The marking criteria are: Individual (15 marks) 1. Task response: depth of knowledge and development of a consistent, clear and well-supported answer to the question. Overall level and quality of application of theory to the case analysis. 2. Delivery: level of confidence, enthusiasm, timing, positive nonverbal communication, ability to attract and engage audience attention 3. Use of language: Clarity of language and comprehension Group (10 marks) 1. Slide Presentation: organised and logical visual presentation of content 2. Audience engagement: collaborative and well managed audience engagement throughout the presentation 3. Referencing: Employment of correct Harvard (AGPS) Referencing style in the intext references and the reference list and, the use of appropriate and relevant, academic and peer reviewed sources. Page 4 of 4 WMGM102 GROUP PRESENTATION MARKING RUBRIC Criteria and Marks Fail (FA) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exceeds expectations Total = 25 Individual Marking Criteria = Total 15 marks Task response Nonsubmission 6 marks Delivery 6 marks Use of language – spoken 3 marks Nonsubmission Nonsubmission Question/s provided are minimally addressed, unclear or inappropriately answered; lack of research and supporting evidence; no real application of theoretical concepts, no recommendations made, or they are inappropriate. Presents suitable responses to the posed questions; although parts may be better developed and supported by research than others; some attempt to application of theoretical concept; recommendations are sound. Well-developed answers to the posed questions which are supported and sometimes extended by research; Thoughtful application of theoretical concepts; recommendations are appropriate and thoughtful. (0-2) (2.5-4) (4.5-6) Confidence and enthusiasm lacking and may be under prepared; the volume and rate are inappropriate, and comprehension is impacted by pronunciation or other aspects of speech; poor nonverbal communication and no real attempt to attract and engage audience attention; timing is an issue. Confident delivery for the most part although there may be irregularities in volume and rate; pronunciation and voice do not pose issues for the listeners’ comprehension; effective but inconsistent nonverbal communication and some attempt to attract and engage audience attention; may be slightly under or over time. Confident, polished enthusiastic delivery; volume and rate are appropriate for interest; pronunciation and voice are clear; effective non-verbal communication and strong ability to attract and engage audience attention; good timing. (0-2) (2.5-4) (4.5-6) Frequent vocabulary and grammar errors that affect overall comprehension. Few vocabulary and grammar errors with minimal impact on comprehension. Very few vocabulary and grammar errors with no impact on comprehension. (0-1) (1.5-2) (2.5-3) 1 Criteria and Marks Fail (FA) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exceeds expectations Total = 25 Group Work Marking Criteria = Total 10 marks Slide Presentation 3 marks NonLack of engaging visuals to submission support the presentation; layout is disorganised. Visuals are mostly used to support the presentation however there may be distracting features; layout is organised for the most part. Visuals are used to support the presentation; layout is logical and well organised. (1.5-2) (2.5-3) Audience participation is managed for the most part with adequate answers to questions; group attempts collaboration but some members may lack full engagement and support. Audience participation is managed well with clear and accurate answers to questions; group collaborates to ensure all members participate to present a well thought out performance and high level of team support. (2.5-3.5) (4-5) Referencing conforms to Harvard (AGPS) style. Few inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies in the intext references and reference list. Referencing conforms to Harvard (AGPS) style no obvious inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies in the in-text references and a reference list. Research consists of rather irrelevant references from nonacademic or non-reputable sources or is not evident. Research is mostly drawing references from academic, reputable, relevant sources. Research is drawing on references from academic, reputable, relevant sources. (0-0.5) (1-1.5) (2) (0-1) Audience Engagement & Team Cohesion 5 marks NonAudience participation is not submission managed well, and answers may be inadequate or unclear; a lack of collaboration amongst team members with an unequal level of participation and support. (0-2) Referencing 2 marks NonReferencing does not conform to submission Harvard (AGPS) style; multiple inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies in the in-text references and reference list. 2 ... Purchase answer to see full attachment