Fluent Essays

Create an introduction to include a clear thesis statement (two sentences), a hook (1–2 sentences) that supports the thesis statement, and concise background context on the topic (two sentences). Develop an outline that clearly describes the main points (causes of the problem, effects, and potential solution) along with the supporting points (benefits), as well as how the evidence identified supports the main and supporting points. Annotate evidence with information regarding how it supports the points being made or appeals to the audience. Create a five-sentence conclusion paragraph that fully restates the thesis in new words and includes a specific, practical call to action Explain how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of one specific supporting point and one specific piece of evidence. Reflect on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by concisely summarizing relevant feedback in your own words, describing specific changes made based on this feedback, and explaining how these changes improved the quality of work. Produce writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Feedback #1 Hi, Dirck - You earned a grade of B on this paper (83\%). Well done! However, please read through my feedback below and review the comments on the submission. Then, contact me so we can get you on track. You can do it! You are off to a great start! However, your explanation of the topics importance within the scenario and in your life is far too general. You want to provide a specific example so that you can focus your topic. The more specific examples you have, the better you are set to write the proposal. Your audience description is on the right path; good job, but it needs more specific, clear details. You understand your audience, but you need to make clear why the topic is important to it. Whenever your descriptions are vague or too general, you may be unable to communicate clearly with your audience. Contact me if you want to talk about your audience. [email protected] Nice start; you have found four or five sources. However, not only do you need five sources, but not all of these sources fulfill the requirements, including being relevant and credible. In addition, you might not have provided an opposing source to help you develop all aspects of your persuasive proposal. Review your sources carefully. You have a good foundation for your research, but you might want to return to the Strayer Library and search in the ENG215 Library Guide (linked on the Library home page) and contact the librarians for help (also linked on the home page, [email protected]). Were here to help, too! You are on your way to writing good summaries. Your summaries are based on most of the 5Ws (who, what, why, where, when); however, in some sources you have not applied the 5Ws, or you might not be writing as clearly and concisely as needed; some confusion may exist.. Good start on this section; however, it is incomplete. You have not described how all sources would be used to support your position, or you have you analyzed the credibility and relevance of all sources. You have only partially addressed fewer that four of the five sources. It is important that you understand how to use your sources and understand their credibility in order to write an effective proposal . See ch. 3.11. Well done. You have made a good start to your analysis! However, it is incomplete, and you have either not discussed more than four of the five sources, or described how these sources fulfill a purpose, or present a variety of perspectives, or demonstrate an ethical approach to research. See ch. 3.11 You are off to a good start, but please edit carefully because 5-6 errors remain. As you know, you demonstrate your credibility through clear, concise writing and demonstrate your credibility through good organization, grammar, style, and correct use of Strayer Writing Standards. Assignment 1 Dirck Mitchell ENG 201 Professor. Maryrose Kasraie July 20, 2021 Topic Proposal topic: the Problem is too many people speeding through my neighborhood Why this topic is important to me: This problem is important to me because i have kids that live here and play in this neighborhood and dont want them to die by a car hitting them Audience Audience: city council, neighborhood residents. Law enforcement officials Audience description: the city council is made up of lawmakers, community leaders and civil servants who care about the safety and security of the neighborhood and its inhabitants. They are the middle man between homeowners and the elected officials. Why this topic is important to the audience: A prolonged and continued negative experience of this type will lead to unnecessary hospitalizations, injuries or even death and will bring a negative light on this neighborhood leading to more people complaining, leaving the neighborhood, or flat out trying to solve the problem themselves. Sources With Summary and Analysis Source 1: Braithwaite, J. (1999). Democracy, community, and problem-solving. https://www.iirp.edu/news/democracy-community-and-problem-solving Summary: John Braithwaite, (criminologist) is a Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University. Braithwaite is the recipient of a number of international awards and prizes for his work. The main idea is solving problems in our community and my paper is about solving a problem in my community The source was published on August 7, 1999 It appeared on the IIRP graduate school website The source was created as a guide to solve problem in local communities using what tools are at your disposal. Analysis: I will use this information contained in this source to show how the use of polls can be beneficial to gain the publics opinion on a certain matter. Then I will show how to use the polling information to drive a solution towards elected officials. I determined this is a credible source by looking at who published the article and also who was cited in the article. I also looked at the statements made and researched them claims to see if they are based in scientific fact Source 2: Spiegel, Rainer. Jan 2012. Preventing Road Injuries in Children by Applying Feedback Devices. https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.libdatab.strayer.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=d4057518-ee6e-4d0d-a3eb-0b9deaa86865\%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ\%3d\%3d#AN=70707518&db=i3h Summary: This article iw written by multiple authors like Spiegel, Rainer, is a MD PhD Farahmand, Parvis Senior Physician, M.D. Da Silva, FábioAnciães neurologist . this articles is based on how to determine how to prevent road injuries in schoolchildren by reducing the prevalence of speeding. This source was published in January of 2012 I found this article using the strayers library. the purpose of this article is to determine how to prevent road injuries in schoolchildren by reducing the prevalence of speeding Analysis: this will be my statistical data that i will use to back up my claim. It will also include studies to back up the claims made. I determined this is a credible source for two reasons one is it is in the Strayer Library which tells me that it is approved by strayer. Also it has credible information and scientific facts that can be proven. Source 3: MICHAEL D. MILLER , & TIMOTHY R. LEVINE. 2008. Persuasion. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203887011-27/modeling-cultures-toward-grounded-paradigms-organizations-mass-culture-mark-hickson-iii-jean-bodon-theresa-bodon Summary: MICHAEL D. MILLER who is a MD and TIMOTHY R. LEVINE who is a Professor and Chair of Communication Studies at UAB this article is used to illuminate how individuals use verbal discourse and nonverbal actions, as well as written discourse, to achieve a variety of instrumental and communication goals such as informing, persuading and providing emotional support to others this source was published in 2008 This book was published as a stand alone book (An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research) this was created to display the human communication theory and research. Analysis: I am using this book for the purpose of conducting my research. this source shows the the way that w community who solves problems together will thrive together. The source is credible because it has been published and copywritten. The book has been around since 2008 and it has other sources quoted in the book. Source 4: Ramaley, Judith A.. (2016). Collaboration in an Era of Change: new Forms of Community Problem-Solving. Metropolitan Universities, 27(1), 3-24.. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1021&context=pubadmin_fac Summary: this article was written by Ramaley, Judith A who is an American biologist and academic administrator The main pint of this article is to determine new ways to respond to complex social, cultural, economic and environmental problems by adapting their educational approaches The article was published in 2016 The article was published in the Portland State University PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FACULTY PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS the purpose of this article is to examine some recent examples from the Greater Portland Metropolitan Area in Oregon that offer insights into new forms of collaboration and collective action. Analysis: I will be using this source for its solution examples and its methods for problem solving. this will be what I use to come up with my solutions to the speeding problem in my neighborhood. Judy was professor at Portland State University and has studied the human condition. and graduated with a P.H.D in anatomy. she was also a member of a joint policy board of the NCAA. Source 5: Yongjun Shin & Donghee Shin. (2016). Modeling community resources and communications mapping for strategic inter-organizational problem solving and civic engagement. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(4), 47-66.. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10630732.2016.1175826 Summary: Yongjun Shin is a Bridgewater State University · Department of Communication Studies Ph.D & Donghee Shin is a Ph.D. from Syracuse University the main idea of this source is to create a conceptual foundation and methodological guide of community resources and communications mapping for collective problem solving and civic engagement on behalf of civil society this source was published on 13 Feb 2017 This article was published in the Journal of Urban Technology the two purposes if this source is to help civil society effectively identify the most appropriate stakeholders for collective problem-solving networks, and to help civil society strategically participate in politics by building public discourse advocacy networks Analysis: this source will be used for the research of how to solve community problems. Also how to engage with civic leaders to resolve issues. It will provide a roadmap to how to use community resources to my advantage when trying to achieve a goal. This is a trusted source because one of the authors is a P.H.D. from Bridgewater State University and serves at the Department of Communication Studies. He also has 13 other publications within the same field of study. Ethical Approach to Gathering Sources 1) First, discuss the purpose of your sources—do they present information in a persuasive way or an informative way? Then describe the affiliations or positions your sources have and discuss how you identified those affiliations and positions. The purpose of my sources are to complete the outline of my paper. one source is to discuss the issue at hand ( speeding in neighborhoods) another is to find applicable solutions to the problem i present. another is to find the scientific ways to present the solutions to the public and another is to fins practical ways to present it to civil leadership within the community. 2) Discuss the variety of perspectives or opinions that your sources express. Does at least one of your five sources present an argument that opposes or debates your potential solution to the problem you’re addressing? Briefly describe some of the different perspectives you found. Many of my sources display a variety of points of views and differences of opinions. the perspectives from the authors display more than one way to see the community leaders that you intend to reach with the audience that you intend to reach. the views and opinions expressed in the articles are from the professional medical doctors and criminologist that are included in my list of sources. 3) Discuss how your sources present secondary information. Do they cite sources of their own? How can the claims made in your sources be corroborated for accuracy? Do any of them contain information that you could see being disputed? The sources I provide to give more than just one point of view. they state their unbias opinions and provind facts unobjectively. Each and every one of the sources that i have provided also have more than one other source that they derived their information. I do see others who see their views as opposite from theirs will look at the information and will see flaws in their points of views