NCFLED - Education
The Assignment: Using all the information from the North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning (NCFELD) resource and the video https://youtu.be/CV7HCc3DQpU , you will complete 2 short activity plans.(The NCFELD link is attached ) You may choose the 2 age groups you would like to focus on.  Be sure to look at NCFELD for the breakdown of age groups.  The following should be included for the 2 activities:  Example: Title of Activity: Age of Child: 8 months  Developmental Domain: Emotional and Social Development Goal:ESD-1 Children demonstrate a positive sense of self-identity and self-awareness Developmental Indicator: ESD 1a Show awareness of their bodies Description of Activity: Details are needed here (minimum of 3 sentences) Evaluation of Activity: How will you evaluate the effectiveness/benefit of this activity?  What are the outcomes you expect for the child? How will you know if the children grasp the concept? (minimum of 3 sentences) Grading Criteria All areas of the activity plan should be included. Goals and indicators should be completely written out as well as include the letters and numbers for each. Be sure the developmental indicator is relative to the age of child. See Example above. All areas are identified for each activity: *Title (10points) *Age (10 points) *Domain, Goal, Developmental Indicator (30 points) *Activity descriptions provide clear instruction. (20 points) *Evaluation method is clearly identified for each activity. (20 points) *Points are deducted for spelling and grammar Resources NCFELD, video https://youtu.be/CV7HCc3DQpU  NC_Foundations_ADA.pdf NC_Foundations_ADA.pdf - Alternative Formats North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development North Carolina Foundations Task Force North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development North Carolina Foundations Task Force ii North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development © 2013. North Carolina Foundations Task Force. Writers Catherine Scott-Little Human Development and Family Studies Department UNC-Greensboro Glyn Brown SERVE Center UNC-Greensboro Edna Collins Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Editors Lindsey Alexander Lindsey Alexander Editorial Katie Hume Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Designer Gina Harrison Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Photography Pages: 60 and 143 courtesy of UNC-Greensboro, Child Care Education Program. 36, 54, 135, 136, front cover (group shot), and back cover (infant) courtesy of NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education. All others: Don Trull, John Cotter Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill The North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development may be freely reproduced without permission for non-profit, educational purposes. Electronic versions of this report are available from the following websites: http://ncchildcare.dhhs.state.nc.us http://www.ncpublicschools.org/earlylearning Suggested citation: North Carolina Foundations Task Force. (2013). North Carolina foundations for early learning and development. Raleigh: Author. Funding for this document was provided by the North Carolina Early Childhood Advisory Council using funds received from a federal State Advisory Council grant from the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.ncpublicschools.ort/earlylearning http://www.ncpublicschools.ort/earlylearning iii North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Table of Contents Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Purpose of Foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Organization of This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 How to Use Foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Domains, Subdomains, and Goals Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Effective Use of Foundations with All Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Foundations and Children’s Success in School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Helping Children Make Progress on Foundations Goals: It Takes Everyone Working Together . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Frequently Asked Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Approaches to Play and Learning (APL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Curiosity, Information-Seeking, and Eagerness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Play and Imagination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Risk-Taking, Problem-Solving, and Flexibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Attentiveness, Effort, and Persistence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Emotional and Social Development (ESD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Developing a Sense of Self . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Developing a Sense of Self With Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Learning About Feelings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 iv North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Health and Physical Development (HPD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Physical Health and Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70 Motor Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Self-Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80 Safety Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84 Language Development and Communication (LDC) . . . . . . 88 Learning to Communicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Foundations for Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104 Foundations for Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 Cognitive Development (CD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Construction of Knowledge: Thinking and Reasoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Creative Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Social Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Mathematical Thinking and Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Scientific Exploration and Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .144 Supporting Dual Language Learners (DLL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Defining Dual Language Learners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 The Dual Language Learning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 DLL and Culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150 The Importance of Families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 DLL and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 Selected Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 v North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Acknowledgments I n 2011, the North Carolina Early Childhood Advisory Council (ECAC) launched and funded the important project of revising the Infant-Toddler Foundations and Preschool Foundations to create the North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development—a single document that describes children’s development and learning from birth to age five. Leaders from the Division of Child Development and Early Education as well as the Office of Early Learning in the Department of Public Instruction provided critical advice, oversight, and vision on the Foundations and its implementation. As listed below, many individuals from across the state devoted their time and expertise to this task force. We are grateful to everyone’s work on this important resource for our state. This publication is dedicated to North Carolina’s early childhood professionals, teachers, and caregivers who nurture and support the development of many young children while their families work or are in school. Expert Reviewers Laura Berk Professor Emeritus, Psychology Department Illinois State University Sharon Glover Cultural Competence Consultant Glover and Associates Melissa Johnson Pediatric Psychologist WakeMed Health and Hospitals Patsy Pierce Speech Language Pathologist Legislative Analyst NC General Assembly Research Division NC Foundations Task Force Inter-Agency Leadership Team Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Deb Cassidy Anna Carter Edna Collins Jani Kozlowski Lorie Pugh Office of Early Learning NC Department of Public Instruction John Pruette Jody Koon Human Development and Family Studies Department UNC-Greensboro Catherine Scott-Little, Co-Facilitator Sheresa Boone Blanchard Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Kelly Maxwell, Co-Facilitator vi North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development NC Foundations Task Force (cont .) Foundations Revisions Expert Workgroup Norm Allard Pre-K Exceptional Children Consultant Office of Early Learning NC Department of Public Instruction Joe Appleton Kindergarten Teacher Sandy Ridge Elementary School Cindy Bagwell Co-Chair of Cognitive Development Workgroup Early Childhood Education Consultant Office of Early Learning NC Department of Public Instruction Harriette Bailey Assistant Professor Birth-Kindergarten Program Coordinator Department of Education, Shaw University Sheila Bazemore Education Consultant Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Bonnie Beam Director Office of School Readiness, Cleveland County Schools Gwen Brown Regulatory Supervisor Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Paula Cancro Preschool Director Our Lady of Mercy Catholic School Deborah Carroll Branch Head Early Intervention, Division of Public Health NC Department of Health and Human Services Kathryn Clark Professor, Child Development Program Coordinator Child Development, Meredith College Renee Cockrell Pediatrician Rocky Mount Children’s Developmental Services Agency Lanier DeGrella Infant Toddler Enhancement Project Manager Child Care Services Association Sherry Franklin Quality Improvement Unit Manager Division of Public Health NC Department of Health and Human Services Kate Gallagher Child Care Program Director Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Khari Garvin Director, Head Start State Collaboration Office Office of Early Learning NC Department of Public Instruction Cristina Gillanders Scientist Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Pamela Hauser Child Care Licensing Consultant Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Ronda Hawkins Chair of Emotional and Social Development Workgroup Early Childhood Program Coordinator Sandhills Community College Patricia Hearron Chair of Approaches to Learning Workgroup Professor, Family and Consumer Sciences Appalachian State University Staci Herman-Drauss Infant Toddler Education Specialist Child Care Services Association Vivian James 619 Coordinator Pre-K Exceptional Children, Office of Early Learning North Carolina Department of Public Instruction LaTonya Kennedy Teacher Mountain Area Child and Family Center Doré LaForett Investigator Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Beth Leiro Physical Therapist Beth Leiro Pediatric Physical Therapy Gerri Mattson Pediatric Medical Consultant Division of Public Health NC Department of Health and Human Services Janet McGinnis Education Consultant Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services vii North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development NC Foundations Task Force (cont .) Margaret Mobley Manager, Promoting Healthy Social Behavior in Child Care Settings Child Care Resources, Inc. Judy Neimeyer Professor Emerita Specialized Education Services UNC-Greensboro Eva Phillips Instructor, Birth-Kindergarten Education Winston-Salem State University Jackie Quirk Chair of Health and Physical Development Workgroup Project Coordinator NC Child Care Health and Safety Resource Center UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health Amy Scrinzi Co-Chair of Cognitive Development Workgroup Early Mathematics Consultant Curriculum and Instruction Division NC Department of Public Instruction Janet Singerman President Child Care Resources, Inc. Diane Strangis Assistant Professor Child Development, Meredith College Dan Tetreault Chair of Language and Communication Workgroup K–2 English Language Arts Consultant Curriculum and Instruction Division NC Department of Public Instruction Brenda Williamson Assistant Professor, Birth-Kindergarten Teacher Education Program Coordinator NC Central University Gale Wilson Regional Specialist NC Partnership for Children Catherine Woodall Education Consultant Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Doyle Woodall Preschool Teacher Johnston County Schools Dual Language Learners Advisory Team Catherine Scott-Little, Chair Associate Professor, Human Development and Family Studies UNC-Greensboro Tanya Dennis Telamon Corporation Shari Funkhouser Pre-K Lead Teacher Asheboro City Schools Cristina Gillanders Scientist Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Belinda J. Hardin Associate Professor, Specialized Education Services UNC-Greensboro Norma A. Hinderliter Special Education Expert Adriana Martinez Director Spanish for Fun Academy Tasha Owens-Green Child Care and Development Fund Coordinator Division of Child Development and Early Education NC Department of Health and Human Services Gexenia E. Pardilla Latino Outreach Specialist Child Care Resources Inc. Jeanne Wakefield Executive Director The University Child Care Center Strategies Workgroup Sheresa Boone Blanchard, Chair Child Development and Family Studies UNC-Greensboro Patsy Brown Exceptional Children Preschool Coordinator Yadkin County Schools Kristine Earl Assistant Director Exceptional Children’s Department Iredell-Statesville Schools Cristina Gillanders Scientist Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute UNC-Chapel Hill Wendy H-G Gray Exceptional Children Preschool Coordinator Pitt County School System viii North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development NC Foundations Task Force (cont .) Patricia Hearron Professor, Family and Consumer Sciences Appalachian State University Staci Herman-Drauss Infant Toddler Education Specialist Child Care Services Association Tami Holtzmann Preschool Coordinator Thomasville City Schools Renee Johnson Preschool Coordinator Edgecombe County Public School Jenny Kurzer Exceptional Children Preschool Coordinator Burke County Public Schools Brenda Little Preschool Coordinator Stokes County Schools Karen J. Long Infant Toddler Specialist Child Care Resources, Inc Jackie Quirk Project Coordinator NC Child Care Health and Safety Resource Center UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health Brenda Sigmon Preschool Coordinator Catawba County/Newton Conover Preschool Program Teresa Smith Preschool Coordinator Beaufort County Schools Susan Travers Exceptional Children Curriculum Manager and Preschool Coordinator Buncombe County Schools Rhonda Wiggins Exceptional Children Preschool Coordinator Wayne County Public Schools 1 North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Introduction North Carolina’s young children. This document, North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development (referred to as Foundations), serves as a shared vision for what we want for our state’s children and answers the question “What should we be helping children learn before kindergarten?” By providing a common set of Goals and Developmental Indicators for children from birth through kindergarten entry, our hope is that parents, educators, administrators, and policy makers can together do the best job possible to provide experiences that help children be well prepared for success in school and life. This Introduction provides important information that adults need in order to use Foundations effectively. We discuss the purpose of the document, how it should be used, and what’s included. We’ve also tried to answer questions that you might have, all in an effort to help readers understand and use Foundations as a guide for what we want children to learn during their earliest years. Foundations can be used to: • Improve teachers’ knowledge of child development; • Guide teachers’ plans for implementing curricula; • Establish goals for children’s development and learning that are shared across programs and services; and • Inform parents and other family members on age-appropriate expectations for children’s development and learning. C hildren’s experiences before they enter school matter—research shows that children who experience high-quality care and education, and who enter school well prepared, are more successful in school and later in their lives. Recognizing the importance of the early childhood period, North Carolina has been a national leader in the effort to provide high-quality care and education for young children. Programs and services such as Smart Start, NC Pre-K, early literacy initiatives, Nurse Family Partnerships and other home visiting programs, and numerous other initiatives promote children’s learning and development. Quality improvement initiatives such as our Star Rated License, Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) agencies, T.E.A.C.H. Early Childhood® Scholarship Project, and the Child Care W.A.G.E.S.® Project are designed to improve the quality of programs and services and, in turn, benefit children. Although the approaches are different, these programs and initiatives share a similar goal—to promote better outcomes for 2 North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Purpose of Foundations North Carolina’s Early Childhood Advisory Committee, Division of Child Development and Early Education, and Department of Public Instruction Office of Early Learning worked together to develop Foundations to provide a resource for all programs in the state. Foundations describes Goals for all children’s development and learning, no matter what program they may be served in, what language they speak, what disabilities they may have, or what family circumstances they are growing up in. Teachers and caregivers can turn to Foundations to learn about child development because the document provides age-appropriate Goals and Developmental Indicators for each age level—infant, toddler, and preschooler. Foundations is also intended to be a guide for teaching–not a curriculum or checklist that is used to assess children’s development and learning, but a resource to define the skills and abilities we want to support in the learning experiences we provide for children. The Goals for children can be used by teachers, caregivers, early interventionists, home visitors, and other professionals who support and promote children’s development and learning. It is, A Note About Terminology Foundations is designed to be useful to a broad range of professionals who work with children. In this document we refer to “teachers and caregivers.” This terminology includes anyone who works with children—teachers, caregivers, early educators, early interventionists, home visitors, etc. The document also refers to “children” generically, which is intended to include infants, toddlers, and preschool children. however, important to remember that while Foundations can help you determine what is “typical” for children in an age group, the Developmental Indicators may not always describe a particular child’s development. When a child’s development and learning does not seem to fit what is included in the continuum under his/her age level, look at the Developmental Indicators for younger or older age groups to see if they are a better fit for the child. Your goal is to learn what developmental steps the child is taking now, and to meet the individual needs of that child on a daily basis. Foundations can also be used as a resource for parents and other family members. All parents wonder if their child is learning what’s needed in order to be successful in school. Parents will find it helpful to review the Goals and Developmental Indicators to learn what most early educators in North Carolina feel are appropriate goals for young children. Finally, Foundations is a useful document for individuals who do not work directly with children, but who support teachers and caregivers in their work. It is important to take stock to see if a program’s learning environment, teaching materials, learning activities, and interactions are supporting children’s development in the areas described 3 North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development in Foundations. Administrators can use Foundations as a guide to evaluate the types of learning experiences provided in their program. Foundations can also be a resource to identify areas where teachers and caregivers need to improve their practices and as a basis for professional development. Training and technical assistance providers should evaluate the support they provide to teachers and caregivers to ensure that the professional development is consistent with the Goals and Developmental Indicators. Furthermore, Foundations can be used as a textbook in higher education courses and a training manual for in-service professional development. In summary, Foundations is designed to be a resource for teachers, caregivers, parents, administrators, and professional development providers as we work together to support the learning and development of North Carolina’s youngest children. Organization of This Document This document begins with this Introduction, which provides background information on the use of Foundations. Following the Introduction, you will find the Goals and Developmental Indicators, which describe expectations for what children will learn prior to kindergarten, starting with infancy and covering all ages through kindergarten entry. A glossary with definitions of key terms that are used throughout Foundations is included at the end of the document. The Goals and Developmental Indicators are divided into five domains: • Approaches to Play and Learning (APL) • Emotional and Social Development (ESD) • Health and Physical Development (HPD) • Language Development and Communication (LDC) • Cognitive Development (CD) Because infants’, toddlers’, and preschool children’s bodies, feelings, thinking skills, language, social skills, love of learning, and knowledge all develop together, it is essential that we include all five of these domains in Foundations. None of the domains is more or less important than others, and there is some overlap between what is covered in one domain and what’s covered in other domains. This is because children’s development and learning is integrated or interrelated. The progress that a child makes in one domain is related to the progress he or she makes in other domains. For example, as a child interacts with adults (i.e., Social Development), she/he learns new words (i.e., Language Development) that help her/ him understand new concepts (i.e., Cognitive Development). Therefore, it is essential that Foundations address all five domains, and that teachers and caregivers who are using Foundations pay attention to all five domains. At the beginning of each domain section, you will find a domain introduction that describes some of the most important ideas related to the domain. This introductory information helps you understand what aspects of children’s learning and development are included in the domain. The introduction is followed by the Goal and Developmental Indicator Continuum (sometimes called a “Continuum” for short in this document) for each domain. The Continuum for each domain is a chart that shows the Goals for the domain, and the Developmental Indicators related to each Goal for each age level. As the sample chart on the next page shows, North Carolina has elected to arrange our Developmental Indicators along a continuum so that all of the Developmental Indicators for the age levels between birth and kindergarten entry are included on the same row. This format allows teachers and caregivers to easily look across the age levels to see the progression that a child might make toward the Goal. 4 North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development The Goals are organized in subdomains or subtopics that fall within the domain. Goals are statements that describe a general area or aspect of development that children make progress on through birth through age five. The Developmental Indicators are more specific statements of expectations for children’s learning and development that are tied to particular age levels. A Goal and Developmental Indicator Continuum is provided for each Goal. 28 North Carolina Foundations for Early Learning and Development Approaches to Play and Learning (APL) Curiosity, Information-Seeking, and Eagerness Goal APL-1: …
CATEGORIES
Economics Nursing Applied Sciences Psychology Science Management Computer Science Human Resource Management Accounting Information Systems English Anatomy Operations Management Sociology Literature Education Business & Finance Marketing Engineering Statistics Biology Political Science Reading History Financial markets Philosophy Mathematics Law Criminal Architecture and Design Government Social Science World history Chemistry Humanities Business Finance Writing Programming Telecommunications Engineering Geography Physics Spanish ach e. Embedded Entrepreneurship f. Three Social Entrepreneurship Models g. Social-Founder Identity h. Micros-enterprise Development Outcomes Subset 2. Indigenous Entrepreneurship Approaches (Outside of Canada) a. Indigenous Australian Entrepreneurs Exami Calculus (people influence of  others) processes that you perceived occurs in this specific Institution Select one of the forms of stratification highlighted (focus on inter the intersectionalities  of these three) to reflect and analyze the potential ways these ( American history Pharmacology Ancient history . Also Numerical analysis Environmental science Electrical Engineering Precalculus Physiology Civil Engineering Electronic Engineering ness Horizons Algebra Geology Physical chemistry nt When considering both O lassrooms Civil Probability ions Identify a specific consumer product that you or your family have used for quite some time. This might be a branded smartphone (if you have used several versions over the years) or the court to consider in its deliberations. Locard’s exchange principle argues that during the commission of a crime Chemical Engineering Ecology aragraphs (meaning 25 sentences or more). Your assignment may be more than 5 paragraphs but not less. INSTRUCTIONS:  To access the FNU Online Library for journals and articles you can go the FNU library link here:  https://www.fnu.edu/library/ In order to n that draws upon the theoretical reading to explain and contextualize the design choices. Be sure to directly quote or paraphrase the reading ce to the vaccine. Your campaign must educate and inform the audience on the benefits but also create for safe and open dialogue. A key metric of your campaign will be the direct increase in numbers.  Key outcomes: The approach that you take must be clear Mechanical Engineering Organic chemistry Geometry nment Topic You will need to pick one topic for your project (5 pts) Literature search You will need to perform a literature search for your topic Geophysics you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes Communication on Customer Relations. Discuss how two-way communication on social media channels impacts businesses both positively and negatively. Provide any personal examples from your experience od pressure and hypertension via a community-wide intervention that targets the problem across the lifespan (i.e. includes all ages). Develop a community-wide intervention to reduce elevated blood pressure and hypertension in the State of Alabama that in in body of the report Conclusions References (8 References Minimum) *** Words count = 2000 words. *** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style. *** In Task section I’ve chose (Economic issues in overseas contracting)" Electromagnetism w or quality improvement; it was just all part of good nursing care.  The goal for quality improvement is to monitor patient outcomes using statistics for comparison to standards of care for different diseases e a 1 to 2 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on the different models of case management.  Include speaker notes... .....Describe three different models of case management. visual representations of information. They can include numbers SSAY ame workbook for all 3 milestones. You do not need to download a new copy for Milestones 2 or 3. When you submit Milestone 3 pages): Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada making the appropriate buying decisions in an ethical and professional manner. Topic: Purchasing and Technology You read about blockchain ledger technology. Now do some additional research out on the Internet and share your URL with the rest of the class be aware of which features their competitors are opting to include so the product development teams can design similar or enhanced features to attract more of the market. The more unique low (The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015) to assist you with this discussion.         https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0 Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will   finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of the business wo evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program Vignette Understanding Gender Fluidity Providing Inclusive Quality Care Affirming Clinical Encounters Conclusion References Nurse Practitioner Knowledge Mechanics and word limit is unit as a guide only. The assessment may be re-attempted on two further occasions (maximum three attempts in total). All assessments must be resubmitted 3 days within receiving your unsatisfactory grade. You must clearly indicate “Re-su Trigonometry Article writing Other 5. June 29 After the components sending to the manufacturing house 1. In 1972 the Furman v. Georgia case resulted in a decision that would put action into motion. Furman was originally sentenced to death because of a murder he committed in Georgia but the court debated whether or not this was a violation of his 8th amend One of the first conflicts that would need to be investigated would be whether the human service professional followed the responsibility to client ethical standard.  While developing a relationship with client it is important to clarify that if danger or Ethical behavior is a critical topic in the workplace because the impact of it can make or break a business No matter which type of health care organization With a direct sale During the pandemic Computers are being used to monitor the spread of outbreaks in different areas of the world and with this record 3. Furman v. Georgia is a U.S Supreme Court case that resolves around the Eighth Amendments ban on cruel and unsual punishment in death penalty cases. The Furman v. Georgia case was based on Furman being convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was caught i One major ethical conflict that may arise in my investigation is the Responsibility to Client in both Standard 3 and Standard 4 of the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (2015).  Making sure we do not disclose information without consent ev 4. Identify two examples of real world problems that you have observed in your personal Summary & Evaluation: Reference & 188. Academic Search Ultimate Ethics We can mention at least one example of how the violation of ethical standards can be prevented. Many organizations promote ethical self-regulation by creating moral codes to help direct their business activities *DDB is used for the first three years For example The inbound logistics for William Instrument refer to purchase components from various electronic firms. During the purchase process William need to consider the quality and price of the components. In this case 4. A U.S. Supreme Court case known as Furman v. Georgia (1972) is a landmark case that involved Eighth Amendment’s ban of unusual and cruel punishment in death penalty cases (Furman v. Georgia (1972) With covid coming into place In my opinion with Not necessarily all home buyers are the same! When you choose to work with we buy ugly houses Baltimore & nationwide USA The ability to view ourselves from an unbiased perspective allows us to critically assess our personal strengths and weaknesses. This is an important step in the process of finding the right resources for our personal learning style. Ego and pride can be · By Day 1 of this week While you must form your answers to the questions below from our assigned reading material CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (2013) 5 The family dynamic is awkward at first since the most outgoing and straight forward person in the family in Linda Urien The most important benefit of my statistical analysis would be the accuracy with which I interpret the data. The greatest obstacle From a similar but larger point of view 4 In order to get the entire family to come back for another session I would suggest coming in on a day the restaurant is not open When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition After viewing the you tube videos on prayer Your paper must be at least two pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages) The word assimilate is negative to me. I believe everyone should learn about a country that they are going to live in. It doesnt mean that they have to believe that everything in America is better than where they came from. It means that they care enough Data collection Single Subject Chris is a social worker in a geriatric case management program located in a midsize Northeastern town. She has an MSW and is part of a team of case managers that likes to continuously improve on its practice. The team is currently using an I would start off with Linda on repeating her options for the child and going over what she is feeling with each option.  I would want to find out what she is afraid of.  I would avoid asking her any “why” questions because I want her to be in the here an Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psychological research (Comp 2.1) 25.0\% Summarization of the advantages and disadvantages of using an Internet site as means of collecting data for psych Identify the type of research used in a chosen study Compose a 1 Optics effect relationship becomes more difficult—as the researcher cannot enact total control of another person even in an experimental environment. Social workers serve clients in highly complex real-world environments. Clients often implement recommended inte I think knowing more about you will allow you to be able to choose the right resources Be 4 pages in length soft MB-920 dumps review and documentation and high-quality listing pdf MB-920 braindumps also recommended and approved by Microsoft experts. The practical test g One thing you will need to do in college is learn how to find and use references. References support your ideas. College-level work must be supported by research. You are expected to do that for this paper. You will research Elaborate on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study 20.0\% Elaboration on any potential confounds or ethical concerns while participating in the psychological study is missing. Elaboration on any potenti 3 The first thing I would do in the family’s first session is develop a genogram of the family to get an idea of all the individuals who play a major role in Linda’s life. After establishing where each member is in relation to the family A Health in All Policies approach Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum Chen Read Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change Read Reflections on Cultural Humility Read A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing Use the bolded black section and sub-section titles below to organize your paper. For each section Losinski forwarded the article on a priority basis to Mary Scott Losinksi wanted details on use of the ED at CGH. He asked the administrative resident