Fluent Essays

Just need a revision and some adjustments and also instructor had given a feedback on the paper and need to revise the paper with feedback provided from the instructor SCENARIO For this task, you will write a proposal in response to the attached “Request for Proposals (RFP)” from the Seamus Company. The company’s background information is included in the attached “Seamus Company Context.” The attached “RFP Questions from Vendors” will help to inform your proposal. Your proposal should demonstrate your research and your technology solution to the problem and show the organization you can meet its needs. Consider what the organization wants (e.g., low cost, high quality, efficiency) and how your proposed technology solution will meet the organization’s needs. The body of your proposal should clearly and specifically outline the solution and how it will work. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.  You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.  Note: Every effort was made to ensure the attached “Request for Proposals (RFP)” is as authentic as possible. You are responsible only for the requirements in the task below. Create a proposal for the Seamus Company by doing the following: A.  Create a title page that includes each of the following elements: •  project name that summarizes the nature of the solution •  name of the proposer (individual or company) •  signature block with a space for your signature and the date   B.  Create a table of contents.   C.  Create an abstract that includes each of the following: •  summary of the problem •  recommendation of the solution •  description of how the proposed solution benefits the customer •  outcomes of the project •  funding requirements •  your expertise relevant to the solution you propose   Note: Expertise described here could be real or hypothetical to fit the scenario.   D.  Create the body of your proposal by doing the following: 1.  Explain your proposed solution as it relates to the requirements in the attached “Request for Proposals (RFP).” 2.  Summarize three published works or case studies that inform the implementation of the proposed solution. 3.  Describe how the goals, supporting objectives, and deliverables of the proposed project will be accomplished. 4.  Provide a projected timeline with completion dates of the deliverables for your project. 5.  Provide a list of resources and their associated costs needed to implement the proposal. 6.  Explain how you will use an evaluation framework to measure the success and effectiveness of the project once it is completed.   E.  Justify how the technology solution meets the business needs of the Seamus Company.   F.  Create a letter of transmittal or cover letter that includes the following: •  an introduction •  a body that expands on the reasons for the proposal •  a conclusion   Note: Any supplemental material that would help the company or organization understand the details of the solution should be placed in an additional section titled “Appendix.”   G. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.   H.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! - _ . * ' ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z RUBRIC A:TITLE PAGE NOT EVIDENT A title page is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The title page does not include each of the given elements. COMPETENT The title page includes each of the given elements. B:TABLE OF CONTENTS NOT EVIDENT A table of contents is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The table of contents does not accurately correspond with the sections of the proposal, or it does not accurately list all the sections. COMPETENT The table of contents accurately corresponds with the sections of the proposal and accurately lists all the sections. C:ABSTRACT NOT EVIDENT An abstract is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The abstract is not relevant to the topic, does not address each of the given points, or does not align with the proposal. COMPETENT The abstract is relevant to the topic, addresses each of the given points, and aligns with the proposal. D1:PROPOSED SOLUTION NOT EVIDENT An explanation of a proposed solution does not relate to the requirements of the RFP. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation of the proposed solution does not establish a relationship between the solution and the RFP. COMPETENT The explanation of the proposed solution establishes a relationship between the solution and the RFP. D2:OTHER IMPLEMENTED SOLUTIONS NOT EVIDENT The submission does not summarize 3 published works or case studies that inform the implementation of the proposed solution. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission summarizes 3 published works or case studies that inform implementation of the proposed solution, but the works or cases are irrelevant to the scenario, or they are poor examples of the proposal’s key elements. COMPETENT The submission summarizes 3 published works or case studies that inform implementation of the proposed solution. D3:GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND DELIVERABLES NOT EVIDENT A description of project goals, supporting objectives, and deliverables is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of project goals, supporting objectives, and deliverables does not demonstrate how they will be accomplished. COMPETENT The description of project goals, supporting objectives, and deliverables demonstrates how they will be accomplished. D4:TIMELINE NOT EVIDENT A timeline is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The provided timeline is not complete, does not align with the deliverables, or contains inaccuracies. COMPETENT The provided timeline is complete, accurate, and the completion dates align with the deliverables. D5:RESOURCES AND COSTS NOT EVIDENT A list of resources and costs is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The list of resources and associated costs does not include all necessary resources or all estimated costs to implement the proposal. COMPETENT The list of resources and associated costs includes all necessary resources and all estimated costs to implement the proposal. D6:MEASURE OF SUCCESS NOT EVIDENT An explanation is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation describes an evaluation framework, but it does not include measures of the success or effectiveness of the project. COMPETENT The explanation describes an evaluation framework that measures the success and effectiveness of the project. E:JUSTIFICATION OF TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION NOT EVIDENT The submission does not provide a justification of how the selected technology solution meets the business needs of the Seamus Company. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission attempts to justify how the selected technology solution meets the needs of the Seamus Company, but the information provided is incorrect, incomplete, or contains inaccuracies. COMPETENT The submission effectively justifies how the selected technology solution meets the business needs of the Seamus Company. F:LETTER NOT EVIDENT No letter of transmittal or cover letter is provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The letter of transmittal or cover letter is unprofessional in tone or style, or the letter does not include all the given points. COMPETENT The letter of transmittal or cover letter is professional in tone and style and includes all the given points. G: SOURCES NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. H: PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.  SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Request for Proposals.docx RFP Questions from Vendors.docx Seamus Company Context.docx