Fluent Essays

I. Ethical Theories and Personal Values  A. Identify the ethical theory you would rely upon to address this dilemma, and describe why it would be effective.  B. How do you separate personal morals from ethics, and why is this important?  C. When is it appropriate to let your morals guide your actions? Why?  II. Duties  A. Describe your course of action if you were faced with this dilemma. Why would this reaction be appropriate and effective?  B. What is your responsibility as a professional in this scenario? Defend your response.  C. Does your ethical responsibility take precedence over your personal views? What do you do if the two are conflicting? D. Identify the impact of society’s changing views of acceptable behavior as it applies to a criminal justice practitioner’s duties.  Guidelines for Submission: Your short paper needs to be 2–3 pages in length double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font. Include APA citations as needed. Scenario: You are working the midnight shift as a police officer. You receive a call to respond to a one-car accident where the car left the roadway and impacted with a tree. Upon your arrival, you see the badly damaged car up against the tree. There are no skid marks apparent and no witnesses around. You approach the car and find the apparent driver behind the wheel. You immediately recognize the driver to be the mayor of your town. You immediately notice signs that the mayor is impaired by alcohol, including the smell of an alcoholic beverage coming from his breath, the slurring of his speech, and the lethargy he is exhibiting. The mayor tells you that he swerved to avoid a dog, lost control and hit the tree. The mayor is not injured. When you ask the mayor if he has consumed alcohol, he tells you that he was at retirement dinner and only had one glass of wine. The mayor asks you to just complete an accident report and give him a ride home. You question him further, telling him you are concerned that he was driving while impaired. The mayor tells you that he is not impaired and not to worry about anything because you never actually saw him driving. The mayor goes on to tell you that he will not say anything to anyone, and he lets you know that he has a lot of influence with what goes on at the police station, and that he has had his eye on you as an up-and-comer. You know that you could just complete an accident report identifying the cause of the accident as swerving to avoid an animal in the roadway. If you do not tell anyone that the mayor was drinking and he does not tell anyone, what is the worst that could happen? JUS 455 Final Project Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this milestone, you will answer the following questions about the scenario you chose in Milestone One. I. Ethical Theories and Personal Values A. Identify the ethical theory you would rely upon to address this dilemma, and describe why it would be effective. B. How do you separate personal morals from ethics, and why is this important? C. When is it appropriate to let your morals guide your actions? Why? II. Duties A. Describe your course of action if you were faced with this dilemma. Why would this reaction be appropriate and effective? B. What is your responsibility as a professional in this scenario? Defend your response. C. Does your ethical responsibility take precedence over your personal views? What do you do if the two are conflicting? D. Identify the impact of society’s changing views of acceptable behavior as it applies to a criminal justice practitioner’s duties. Guidelines for Submission: Your short paper needs to be 2–3 pages in length double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font. Include APA citations as needed. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Ethical Theory Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports cl ai ms wi th s chol arly s ources Identi fi es ethi cal theory to addres s di l emma, and des cri bes why i t woul d be effecti ve Identi fi es ethi cal theory to addres s di l emma, but does not des cri be why i t woul d be effecti ve Does not i denti fy ethi cal theory to addres s di l emma 13 Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Personal Morals Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and provi des s peci fi c exampl es Determi nes how to s eparate pers onal moral s from ethi cs , and es tabl i s hes i mportance of s eparati on Determi nes how to s eparate pers onal moral s from ethi cs , but does not es tabl i s h i mportance of s eparati on Does not determi ne how to s eparate pers onal moral s from ethi cs 13 Ethical Theories and Personal Values: Actions Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and provi des s peci fi c rel evant s cenari os to s upport cl ai ms Determi nes when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons , and defends cl ai ms Determi nes when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons , but does not defend cl ai ms Does not determi ne when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons 13 Duties: Course of Action Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and cl ai ms are wel l qual i fied Des cri bes cours e of acti on and why reacti on woul d be appropri ate and effecti ve Des cri bes cours e of acti on but does not des cri be why reacti on woul d be appropri ate and effecti ve Does not des cri be cours e of acti on 13 Duties: Responsibility Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports res pons e wi th s peci fi c exampl es from s cenari o Determi nes res pons i bi lity as a profes s i onal i n the s cenari o, and defends res pons e Determi nes res pons i bi lity as a profes s i onal i n the s cenari o, but does not defend res pons e Does not determi ne the res pons i bi lity of a profes s i onal i n the s cenari o 13 Duties: Precedence Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s ol uti ons are rel evant and pl aus i ble Es tabl i s hes i f ethi cal res pons i bi lity takes precedence over pers onal vi ews , and how to addres s them i f they are confl i cti ng Es tabl i s hes i f ethi cal res pons i bi lity takes precedence over pers onal vi ews , but does not es tabl i s h how to addres s them i f they are confl i cti ng Does not es tabl i s h i f ethi cal res pons i bi lity takes precedence over pers onal vi ews 13 Duties: Changing Views Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports cl ai ms wi th a real -worl d exampl e Identi fi es the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of acceptabl e behavi or, and addres s es how i t appl i es to a cri mi nal justice practi ti oner’s duti es Identi fi es the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of acceptabl e behavi or, but does not addres s how i t appl i es to a cri mi nal justi ce practi ti oner’s duti es Does not i denti fy the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of acceptabl e behavi or 13 Articulation of Response Submi s s i on i s free of errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar, s pel l i ng, s yntax, and organi zati on and i s pres ented i n a profes s i onal and eas y-to- read format Submi s s i on has no major errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar, s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on Submi s s i on has major errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar, s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on that negati vel y i mpact readabi l i ty and arti cul ation of mai n i deas Submi s s i on has criti cal errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar, s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on that prevent unders tandi ng of i deas 9 Earned Total 100% Destiny Nance Southern New Hampshire University 1-3 Final Project: Milestone One: Scenario Selection August 23rd, 2021 I am going to select scenario 2, regarding the mayor and the accident with the tree. This situation will put anybody in a sticky situation because you both can have each others’ careers in your hands. It can be a test for the both of you, ethically. Placing myself in the shoes of an officer who is fundamentally being bribed by the Mayor of the town is something that must be difficult to manage. Thus, thinking of a proper and compelling response to the present circumstance will be generally hard for me with this venture. Running head: MILESTONE TWO SCENARIO OVERVIEW 1 MILESTONE TWO SCENARIO OVERVIEW 2 Milestone Two: Scenario Overview Destiny Nance Southern New Hampshire University August 27th, 2021 Identify the Ethical Dilemma Raised By the Facts in the Case Scenario According to Levine (2014), an ethical dilemma is when one faces a problem with decision-making based on two conflicting options, none of which is ethically acceptable or morally upright. In this case scenario, the ethical dilemma is that the police officer must report on the accident. Still, the mayor insists that the officer shouldn't include that the mayor was under alcohol. On the one hand, the officer can see that the condition under which the mayor's car was after the accident and that the mayor smelled alcohol could be the possible cause. On the other hand, the mayor insists that he was trying to dodge a dog, which was the cause of the accident. These options present an ethical dilemma to the police officer as he cannot find a relatively straightforward solution to include in the report. This case is an ethical dilemma because the officer experiences a conflict between alternative ways to accident reporting. Choosing either of the alternatives will potentially make the officer compromise on the moral principle and violate the ethical standards of honesty (Levine, 2014). Still, the officer is obligated to write a report. Therefore, this case challenges the integrity and honesty parts of ethics. The main factor that led to this ethical dilemma is the competing interests between the mayor and the police officer. On the one hand, the officer can see that the mayor is drunk, which should be included in the report. Contrarily, he cannot confirm that he saw the mayor drive his car under the influence. Also, the mayor claims that he isn't impaired and warns the officer from mentioning anything about him. Therefore, the competing interests come because the officer is competing to save his job while the mayor is competing to protect his reputation (Worley, 2016). The officer should consider the effects of violating the ethical principles of honesty while writing the report before he takes an action course. References Levine, Emma, and Schweitzer, Maurice E., Are Liars Ethical? On the Tension between Benevolence and Honesty (2014). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 107-117., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2910061 Worley, R. M., Worley, V. B., & Wood, B. A. (2016). ‘There were ethical dilemmas all day long!’: harrowing tales of ethnographic researchers in criminology and criminal justice. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(4), 289-308.