Fluent Essays

QUESTION: SEE ATTACHED FOR QUESTION, INSTRUCTIONS, AND RUBRICS Rubic_Print_Format Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points NRS-493 NRS-493-O501 Literature Review 50.0 Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (89.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 80.0% Literature Review 10.0% An introduction is not present. An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides incentive for the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading. Comparison of Research Questions 20.0% No comparison of research questions is presented. A comparison of research questions is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of research questions is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented. Comparison of Sample Populations 20.0% No comparison of sample populations is presented. A comparison of sample populations is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented. Comparison of the Limitations of the Study 20.0% No comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A comparison of the limitations of the study is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research 10.0% No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented, but they are not valid. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid, but they are cursory. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid and moderately thorough. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are reflective and insightful. Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Format 5.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Weightage 100% INSTRUCTION:  This is a continuous assignment of PICOT QUESTION, AND LITERATURE EVALUATION TABLE (REFERENCE IS NEEDED TO BE MADE TO THESE TWO ASSIGNMENTS IN ORDER ACHIEVE A GOOD GRADE)   1. Literature Review.  The Top Part of the assignment must be completed; you can also present your PIOCT and gain feedback so you will have to complete it for future assignments. This is a paper (in APA format) is for you to present an introduction of the PICOT (again spell out in the statement format (P- I- C- O- T) with the summary analysis of your supportive references as a whole for your project.  You don’t have to summarize each article but can combine the thoughts and suggestions into a reference.   it is expected that you have a correct PIOCT in this assignment and know how to cite a reference for the support of your comments in APA format. You can relate this to the articles that you have read with previous assignments (literature review). This is a literature review & analysis of how current research supports the PICOT statement, as well as identifies issuers that are known and what is not known with the supportive evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT QUESTIONNAIRE, AND LITERATURE EVALUATION TABLE ASSIGNMENT (with the feedback) to develop a 750-1,000-word paper with a review that includes the elements listed in the details of the assignment in your course materials. Don’t submit just the responses to the objectives/questions; this is an outline format for your paper and add please add a summary conclusion for all papers.    FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUCTOR: PICOT QUESTION INSTRUCTORS FEEDBACK; The topic was introduced with supportive reference, your PICOT statement needs to include a measurable outcome, and the timeline which needs some revision with a summary conclusion of your paper. The list of references seems to support your topic and should be used to support your topic, plan, and interventions in the future, in addition, see the attached feedback and comments. LITERATURE EVALUATION TABLE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTORS FEEDBACK; The literature evaluation introduction topic was presented with your PICOT statement; with a measurable outcome per previous feedback suggestions and the timeline. The list of references should be used to support your topic, plan, and interventions in the future. N.B. PLEASE PUT INTO CONSIDERATION THESE TWO FEEDBACKS FROM THE INSTRUCTOR TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT. LITERATURE REVIEW QUESTION: While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project. A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT QUESTION PAPER, AND LITERATURE EVALUATION TABLE ASSIGNMENTS to develop a 750-1,000-word review that includes the following sections: 1. Title page 2. Introduction section 3. A comparison of research questions 4. A comparison of sample populations 5. A comparison of the limitations of the study 6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. PLEASE SPELL OUT THE PICOT QUESTION PLEASE!!!!!!!