Fluent Essays

THIS MUST BE COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 6 2021 AT 8 P.M EASTERN STANDARD TIME IN THE U.S. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS. IF YOU CAN NOT COMPLETE PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT BID. YOU MUST WATCH VIDEOS AND TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENT. Part 2: Reflection In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon the lesson and your delivery. Include the following in your reflection: · Brief summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments · Discuss the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place. Include a discussion of what went well. · Describe ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson. · Identify the areas that went well and areas in which to improve. · Reflect on how this experience will affect your future professional practice. You do not need to include the lesson plan in your assignment submission; however, you are encouraged to include any relevant artifacts that will assist you in your reflection. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite (Plagiarism Check). A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Materials if you need assistance. Document the locations and hours you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form. Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to the LMS in the last topic. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center. Video Links MUST WATCH FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPjfbStnWd8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T0iGReGN2Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTUbiciSyvY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXVcc3F0_FA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTTlFh8NFlU Clinical Field Experience B: Delivery of Higher-Order Thinking Lesson - Rubric Collapse All Lesson Summary 10.5 points Criteria Description Lesson Summary 5. Target 10.5 points Brief but thoroughly described summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points Brief but clearly described summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided. 3. Approaching 7.77 points Unfocused description of summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points Incomplete or insufficient description of summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson 10.5 points Criteria Description Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson 5. Target 10.5 points A thorough discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points A credible discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined. 3. Approaching 7.77 points An underdeveloped discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points An ineffective discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Additional Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson 10.5 points Criteria Description Additional Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson 5. Target 10.5 points A thoughtful, specific discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points A logical discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided. 3. Approaching 7.77 points A vague discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points A flawed discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Lesson Delivery Analysis and Feedback 10.5 points Criteria Description Lesson Delivery Analysis and Feedback 5. Target 10.5 points Professionally described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points Properly described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation. 3. Approaching 7.77 points Superficially described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points Unconvincingly described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Future Teaching Practice 10.5 points Criteria Description Future Teaching Practice 5. Target 10.5 points Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is thoughtful. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is competent. 3. Approaching 7.77 points Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is minimal. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is unrealistic. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Organization 7 points Criteria Description Organization 5. Target 7 points The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Acceptable 6.09 points The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. 3. Approaching 5.18 points The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. 2. Insufficient 4.83 points An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Mechanics of Writing 10.5 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. Target 10.5 points Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. 4. Acceptable 9.14 points Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. 3. Approaching 7.77 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. 2. Insufficient 7.24 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed.